From the design of green buildings to resilience management of building stocks

References

• Adger, W. N. (2003). Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography, 79(4), 387–404. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahern, J. (2011). From fail-safe to safe-to-fail: Sustainability and resilience in the new urban world. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100(4), 341–343. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An, L. (2012). Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: Review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling, 229, 25–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anand, C. K., & Amor, B. (2017). Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, A. (1996). Assessing the life expectancies of buildings and their components in life cycle costing. Proceedings of the RICS construction, building and real estate research conference (COBRA).
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G., & Oleson, T. (1996). Urban sprawl as a path dependent process. Journal of Economic Issues, 30(2), 609–615. doi: 10.1080/00213624.1996.11505825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft-Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Börjeson, L., et al. (2006). Towards a user's guide to scenarios–A report on scenario types and scenario techniques. Stockholm, Sweden: Royal institute of technology / Futures, 38, 723–739.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, F., & Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: Resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-02029-120123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Brock, W., Mäler, K., & Perrings. (2002). Resilience and sustainability: The economic analysis of non-linear dynamic systems. In L. H. Gunderson & C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems (pp. 261–289). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future: Report of the world commission on environment and development. UN Documents. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M., Chang, S. E., Eguchi, R. T., Lee, G. C., O’Rourke, T. D., Reinhorn, A. M., … von Winterfeldt, D. (2003). A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake spectra, 19(4), 733–752. doi: 10.1193/1.1623497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. (2004). Changing context for environmental knowledge. Building Research & Information, 32(2), 91–109. doi: 10.1080/0961321042000211396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge, W. O., Landis, A. E., Jones, A. K., Schaefer, L. A., & Bilec, M. M. (2013). Dynamic life cycle assessment: Framework and application to an institutional building. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3), 538–552. doi: 10.1007/s11367-012-0528-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch, C., & Börstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning, 75(1), 1–52. doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRF. (2014). City resilience framework – ARUP and Rockefeller foundation November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C. (2009). What is BIM? Digital Building Lab. ISO/TS 12911:2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T. (2014). Exploring the time dimension of low carbon retrofit: Owner-occupied housing. Building Research & Information, 42(4), 477–488. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2013.804769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett, W., Hughes, M., Krieg, H., Albrecht, S., & Vennström, A. (2012). Flexible strategies for long-term sustainability under uncertainty. Building Research & Information, 40(5), 545–557. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.702565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, R., Norman, G., Meadows, J., & Robinson, G. (1989). Life cycle costing: Theory and practice. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., et al. (2002, April 16). Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio, 31(5), 437–440. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, P. (1884). An analysis of the principles of economics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 12, 943–980. doi: 10.1017/S0370164600001486
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and responsibility. Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1–10. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00188
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. (1972). Designing for survival: The President introduces his long life/loose fit/low energy study. Royal Institute of British Architects Journal, 79(9), 374–376.
   Google Scholar
• Granger, F. (trans.). (1931). Vitruvius: De architectura, Books I-IV. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, S., Chan, A., Clark, D., & Jordan, R. (2012). Modeling the integration of stakeholder knowledge in social–ecological decision-making: Benefits and limitations to knowledge diversity. Ecological Modelling, 229, 88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen, A., Behnisch, M., & Kohler, N. (2009). Perspectives in the reality-based generation, nD modelling, and operation of buildings and building stocks. Building Research & Information, 37(5-6), 503–519. doi: 10.1080/09613210903189509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedani, A. Z., & Huber, F. (2012). A comparative study of DGNB, LEED and BREEAM certificate systems in urban sustainability. In M. Pacetti, G. Passerini, C. A. Brebbia, & G. Latini (Eds.), The Sustainable City VII: Urban Regeneration and Sustainability, Vol. 1. Southampton, UK: WIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, D. (2010). When modern was green: Life and work of landscape architect leberecht migge. London, New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415561396.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, N. (2007). Use of heuristics: Insights from forecasting research. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(1), 5–24. doi: 10.1080/13546780600872502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, U. (2009). Long-term building stock survival and intergenerational management: the role of institutional regimes. Building Research & Information, 37(5-6), 552–568. doi: 10.1080/09613210903189533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, U., & Kohler, N. (2014a). Resilience in the built environment. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 119–129. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.873593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, U., & Kohler, N. (2014b). The ideal of resilient systems and questions of continuity. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 158–167. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.858927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245
   Google Scholar
• Hollnagel, E., Woods, D. D., & Leveson, N. (Eds.). (2006). Resilience engineering: Concepts and precepts. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Ibáñez-Forés, V., Pacheco-Blanco, B., Capuz-Rizo, S. F., & Bovea, M. D. (2016). Environmental Product Declarations: exploring their evolution and the factors affecting their demand in Europe. Journal of Cleaner Production, 116, 157–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2014). Fifth assessment report (AR5) (Working Group II). Report, impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Retrieved from http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K., Desai, A., & Mulville, M. (2014). Employing back casting principles for the formation of long term built asset management strategies-A theoretical approach.
   Google Scholar
• Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kohler, N. (1999). The relevance of Green Building Challenge: an observer's perspective. Building Research & Information, 27(4-5), 309–320. doi: 10.1080/096132199369426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, N., & Yang, W. (2007). Long-term management of building stocks. Building Research & Information, 35(4), 351–362. doi: 10.1080/09613210701308962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, H., Kohler, N., Kreissig, J., & Lützkendorf, T. (2010). A life cycle approach to buildings: Principles-Calculations-Design tools. Munich: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Krusche, P., Althaus, D., & Gabriel, I. (1982). Ökologisches Bauen. Wiesbaden: Umweltbundesamt Bauverlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. (2011). Green adaptive reuse: Issues and strategies for the built environment. In D. Wu (Eds.), Modelling risk management in sustainable construction. computational risk management (pp. 199–209). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Langston, C. (2014). Measuring GOOD architecture: Long life, loose fit, low energy. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), 163–174. doi: 10.14207/ejsd.2014.v3n4p163
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, L., Rajkovich, N., Leighton, C., McCoy, K., Calhoun, K., Mallen, E., … Kwok, A. (2011). Green building and climate resilience: Understanding impacts and preparing for changing conditions. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Leichenko, R. (2011). Climate change and urban resilience. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 3(3), 164–168. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A. (1985). Multiple perspectives: Overcoming the weaknesses of MS/OR. Interfaces, 15, 77–85. doi: 10.1287/inte.15.4.77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lützkendorf, T., & Balouktsi, M. (2017). Assessing a Sustainable Urban Development: Typology of Indicators and Sources of Information. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38, 546–553. doi: 10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.122
   Google Scholar
• Madni, A. M., & Jackson, S. (2009). Towards a conceptual framework for resilience engineering. IEEE Systems Journal, 3(2), 181–191. doi: 10.1109/JSYST.2009.2017397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Breen, P., & Anderies, J. M. (2011). Resilience: A literature review. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as a machine for learning. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36(3), 360–376. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, S. (2014). Resilience and competing temporalities in cities. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 202–220. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.869894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffatt, S., & Kohler, N. (2008). Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system. Building Research & Information, 36(3), 248–268. doi: 10.1080/09613210801928131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermeyer, Y., Wallbaum, H., & Reuter, F. (2013). Multidimensional Pareto optimization as an approach for site-specific building refurbishment solutions applicable for life cycle sustainability assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(9), 1762–1779. doi: 10.1007/s11367-013-0548-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm. H. (1969) ‘Das gesunde Haus’. Unser nächster Umweltschutz. Die biologische Bauordnungslehre in der Architectura perennis. Ordo-Verlag, Konstanz.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. W., Barbier, E. B., & Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable development. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pickett, S., McGrath, B. , Cadenasso, M. L., & Felson, A. J. (2014). Ecological resilience and resilient cities. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.850600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago, 4: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of Mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, A. (2008). Does demolition or refurbishment of old and inefficient homes help to increase our environmental, social and economic viability? Energy Policy, 36(12), 4487–4501. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• renovate-europe. (2017). Annual report 2017. Retrieved from http://renovate-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/compressed.jpg
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roggema, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2012). Swarm planning for climate change: an alternative pathway for resilience. Building Research & Information, 40(5), 606–624. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2012.710047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanguinetti, P., Abdelmohsen, S., Lee, J., Lee, J., Sheward, H., & Eastman, C. (2012). General system architecture for BIM: An integrated approach for design and analysis. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 26(2), 317–333. doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2011.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPUR. (2008). The dilemma of existing buildings. Private property, public risks (SPUR Report Boston).
   Google Scholar
• Tainter, J. A., & Taylor, G. M. (2014). Complexity, problem-solving, sustainability and resilience. Building Research & Information, 42(2), 168–181. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.850599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testart, A. (1991). Pour les Sciences Sociales Essai d’épistémologie. Paris: Bourgeois editeur.
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, A., & Van der Flier, K. (2011). Understanding obsolescence: a conceptual model for buildings. Building Research & Information, 39(4), 352–362. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2011.576328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tredgold, T. (1818). On the Transverse Strength of Timber. In Philosophical Magazine: a Journal of Theoretical, Experimental and Applied Science, Chapter XXXXVII. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, S., & Moench, M. (2012). A framework for urban climate resilience. Climate and Development, 4(4), 311–326. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2012.745389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, L., & Campanella, T. (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volk, R., Stengel, J., & Schultmann, F. (2014). Building Information Modeling (BIM) for existing buildings – Literature review and future needs. Automation in Construction, 38, 109–127. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2013.10.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Carlowitz, H. C., & von Rohr, J. B. (1713). Sylvicultura oeconomica. Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. H., Gunderson, L. H., Kinzig, A. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13. doi: 10.5751/ES-01530-110113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watt, K., & Craig, P. (1986). System stability principles. Systems Research, 3(4), 191–201. doi: 10.1002/sres.3850030403
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for safety. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.
   Google Scholar