Introducing the qualitative performance gap: stories about a sustainable building

References

• Basso, K. H. (1996). Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache. Albuquerque: UNM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. (2009). Analysing qualitative data: More than ‘identifying themes’. Malaysian Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(2), 6–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bazeley, P. ( Writer). (2015). Master class: Theory and practice of qualitative data analysis in NVivo, NVivo Symposium with Pat Bazeley. SFU Harbour Centre, Vancouver: Symposium conducted by SFU Library’s Research Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Chapter 11: Content analysis, an introduction. Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F. (2006). Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 299–311. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnett, E., & Olgyay, V. W. (2009). Crystallized pedagogy: Architecture as a medium for sustainability education. Paper presented at the PLEA2009: 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, 22–24 June 2009, Quebec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bordass, W., Cohen, R., & Field, J. (2004). Energy performance in non-domestic buildings: Closing the credibility gap. Paper presented at the Improving Energy Efficiency of Commercial Buildings Conference 2004, Frankfurt, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Z. (2009). Occupant comfort and engagement in green buildings: Examining the effects of knowledge, feedback and workplace culture (PhD). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Z., & Cole, R. (2009). Influence of occupants’ knowledge on comfort expectations and behaviour. Online, Building Research and Information, 37(3), 227–245. doi: 10.1080/09613210902794135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Z., Cole, R., O’Shea, M., & Robinson, J. (2009). New expectations in delivering sustainable buildings: From occupant to inhabitant. Paper presented at the PLEA2009 – The 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, June 22–24, Québec City, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Z., Dowlatabadi, H., & Cole, R. (2009). Feedback and adaptive behaviour in green buildings. Intelligent Buildings International, 1(4), 296–315. doi: 10.3763/inbi.2009.0034
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., & Shove, E. (2004). Comfort: A review of philosophies and paradigms. University of Lancaster. Retrieved from: http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/futcom/fc_litfinal1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chappells, H., & Shove, E. (2005). Debating the future of comfort: Environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment. Building Research & Information, 33(1), 32–40. doi: 10.1080/0961321042000322762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, A.-M. (2016). Understanding the performance gap. (Master of Science), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, L. F., Lowe, R., Raslan, R., Altamirano-Medina, H., & Wingfield, J. (2014). A socio-technical approach to post-occupancy evaluation: Interactive adaptability in domestic retrofit. Building Research & Information, 42(5), 574–590. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.912539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, R. J. (2012). Transitioning from green to regenerative design. Building Research & Information, 40(1), 39–53. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2011.610608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, L. (2014). The teaching green school building: A framework for linking architecture and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 836–857. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2013.833586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2016). Normalizing sustainability in a regenerative building: the social practice of being at CIRS. (Doctorate dissertation), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, R., Robinson, J., Brown, Z., & O’Shea, M. (2008). Re-contextualizing the notion of comfort. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 323–336. doi: 10.1080/09613210802076328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranz, G., Lindsay, G., Morhayim, L., & Lin, A. (2014). Communicating sustainability: A postoccupancy evaluation of the David Brower Center. Environment and Behavior, 46(7), 826–847. doi: 10.1177/0013916513475449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuble, M. P., & de Dear, R. J. (2012). Green occupants for green buildings: The missing link? Building and Environment, 56, 21–27. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.02.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuble, M. P., & de Dear, R. J. (2014). Is it hot in here or is it just me? Validating the post-occupancy evaluation. Intelligent Buildings International, 6(2), 112–134. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2014.883299
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, R., Opitz, M., Hicks, T., Von Neida, B., & Herrera, S. (2011). Evaluating the energy performance of the first generation of LEED-certified commercial buildings. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, E. W., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Location, location, location: The misprediction of satisfaction in housing lotteries. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(11), 1421–1432. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., Jones, R., Karvonen, A., Millard, L., & Wendler, J. (2015). Living labs and co-production: University campuses as platforms for sustainability science. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 16, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedoruk, L. (2013). ‘Smart’ energy systems and networked buildings: Examining the integrations, controls, and experience of design through operation. (Master of Science), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fedoruk, L., Cole, R., Robinson, J., & Cayuela, A. (2015). Learning from failure: Understanding the anticipated–achieved building energy performance gap. Building Research & Information, 43(6), 750–763. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1036227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi: 10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2013). New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izadpanahi, P., Elkadi, H., & Tucker, R. (2015). Greenhouse affect: The relationship between the sustainable design of schools and children’s environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izadpanahi, P., & Tucker, R. (2015). Sustainable schools as pedagogical tools for environmental education. Paper presented at the Living and Learning: Research for a Better Built Environment: 49th International Conference of the Architectural Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, K., & Topouzi, M. (2013). Closing the loop: using hero stories and learning stories to remake energy policy. Proceedings of ECEEE Summer Study. Presqu’île de Giens, France: European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Janda, K., & Topouzi, M. (2015). Telling tales: Using stories to remake energy policy. Building Research & Information, 43(4), 516–533. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2015.1020217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopp, J. (2015). How we see CIRS: A media analysis of coverage of the Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability. Unpublished report, August 18.
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A. (1995). Dissatisfaction and office productivity. Facilities, 13(2), 13–19. doi: 10.1108/02632779510078120
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., & Bordass, B. (2007). Are users more tolerant of ‘green’ buildings?’ Building Research & Information, 35(6), 662–673. doi: 10.1080/09613210701529518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., & Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: Practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38(5), 564–577. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.495217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. (2005). The hidden curriculum – an exploration into the potential for green buildings to silently communicate a pro-environmental message. (Master of Advanced Studies in Architecture Thesis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Newsham, G., Mancini, S., & Birt, B. (2009). Do LEED-certified buildings save energy? Yes, but … . Energy and Buildings, 41(8), 897–905. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, C., Wilks, S., & Hes, D. (2009). Educational buildings as 3D text books: Linking ecological sustainability, pedagogy and space. Open House International, 34(1), 17–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. (1993). Architecture as pedagogy. Conservation Biology, 7(2), 226–228. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07020226.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. (1997). Architecture as pedagogy II. Conservation Biology, 11(3), 597–600. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.011003597.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, D. (1998). Breaking ground. Retrieved May 24, 2017, from http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/education-for-life/799
   Google Scholar
• Orr, D. (2013). Place and pedagogy. NAMTA Journal, 38(1), 183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Pless, S., Torcellini, P., & Petersen, J. (2004). Oberlin College Lewis Center for Environmental Studies: A low energy academic building. Paper presented at the World Renewable Energy Congress VIII and Expo, July.
   Google Scholar
• Reckermann, J. (2014). CIRS pre-occupancy evaluation: Inhabitant feedback processes and possibilities for a regenerative place. (Master of Arts Thesis), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Berkhout, T., Cayuela, A., & Campbell, A. (2013). Next generation sustainability at the University of British Columbia: The university as societal test-bed for sustainability. In Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities: The role of living laboratories (pp. 27–48). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., & Cole, R. (2015). Theoretical underpinnings of regenerative sustainability. Building Research & Information, 43(2), 133–143. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2014.979082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J., Cole, R., Cayuela, A., & Kingstone, A. (2013). The Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability, UBC: Creating net positive benefits at multiple scales. Paper presented at the CaGBC National Conference and Expo, Vancouver BC.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E., Railton, P., Baumeister, R. F., & Sripada, C. (2013). Navigating into the future or driven by the past. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 119–141. doi: 10.1177/1745691612474317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Chappells, H., Lutzenhiser, L. & Hackett, B. (2008). Comfort in a lower carbon society. Building Research & Information, 36(4), 307–311. doi: 10.1080/09613210802079322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, S. (2014). Application of life-cycle approaches for the evaluation of high performance buildings. (Doctorate), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (2012). Environmental scientist of the year: Canada’s greenest prof. Canadian Geographic ( online), June.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, C., & Frankel, M. (2008). Energy performance of LEED for new construction buildings. New Buildings Institute, 4, 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• UBC. (2016). UBC overview and facts. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from http://www.ubc.ca/about/facts.html
   Google Scholar
• Veitch, J. (2008). Investigating and influencing how buildings affect health: Interdisciplinary endeavours. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 281–288. doi: 10.1037/a0013567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2015). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(June 1), 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• Westerhoff, L. (2015). City stories: From narrative to practice in Vancouver’s Olympic village. (Doctorate), University Of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, D., DiGiacomo, A., & Kingstone, A. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLOS ONE, 8(1). doi: 10.1371/annotation/2a7e4838-1938-4728-b796-f4cf06b8c36d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, D., DiGiacomo, A., Lenkic, P., Wong, V., & Kingstone, A. (2016). Being in a ‘green’ building elicits ‘greener’ recycling, but not necessarily ‘better’ recycling. PLOS ONE, 11(1), e0145737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar