637
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Challenges to business ecosystem alignment when implementing solar photovoltaic systems in the Swedish built environment

, &
Pages 497-514 | Received 10 May 2023, Accepted 01 Sep 2023, Published online: 12 Sep 2023

References

  • Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Ritala, P. (2017). Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010
  • Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as structure. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316678451
  • Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
  • Aksenova, G., Kiviniemi, A., Kocaturk, T., & Lejeune, A. (2019). From Finnish AEC knowledge ecosystem to business ecosystem: Lessons learned from the national deployment of BIM. Construction Management and Economics, 37(6), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1481985
  • Andersson, J., Hellsmark, H., & Sandén, B. (2021). Photovoltaics in Sweden – Success or failure? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143, 110894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110894
  • Andersson, P., Byström, A., Fjellgaard Mikalsen, R., Försth, M., Van Hees, P., Kovacs, P., & Runefors, M. (2019). Innovativa elsystem i byggnader: konsekvenser för brandsäkerhet. In.
  • Ansari, S., Garud, R., & Kumaraswamy, A. (2016). The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1829–1853. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2442
  • Baer, M., Dirks, K. T., & Nickerson, J. A. (2013). Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2004
  • Bankel, A., & Mignon, I. (2022). Solar business models from a firm perspective – An empirical study of the Swedish market. Energy Policy, 166, 113013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113013
  • Barlow, J. (2000). Innovation and learning in complex offshore construction projects. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00115-3
  • Bennett, J., Baker, A., Johncox, E., & Nateghi, R. (2020). Characterizing the key predictors of renewable energy penetration for sustainable and resilient communities. Journal of Management in Engineering, 36(4), 04020016. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000767
  • Bremner, R. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Hannah, D. P. (2017). Business ecosystems. In Collaborative strategy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bröchner, J. (2016). Coordination in slowly emerging service ecosystems-construction history. Revue Européenne d’Économie et Management des Services, 2016(2), 17–41.
  • Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2013). The organisation of innovation in ecosystems: Problem framing, problem solving, and patterns of coupling. In Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems (pp. 167–194). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Chen, H., Jin, Z., Su, Q., & Yue, G. (2020). The roles of captains in megaproject innovation ecosystems: the case of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 28(3), 662–680. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2020-0076
  • Cobben, D., Ooms, W., Roijakkers, N., & Radziwon, A. (2022). Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals. Journal of Business Research, 142, 138–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.046
  • Curtius, H. C. (2018). The adoption of building-integrated photovoltaics: Barriers and facilitators. Renewable Energy, 126, 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.04.001
  • Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2014). “Systematic combining”—A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036
  • Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Exploration and exploitation in project-based organizations: Development and diffusion of knowledge at different organizational levels in construction companies. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.07.005
  • Eriksson, P. E. (2015). Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 21(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2014.08.003
  • Gambatese, J. A., & Hallowell, M. (2011). Factors that influence the development and diffusion of technical innovations in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 29(5), 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.570355
  • Gann, D. M., & Salter, A. J. (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29(7–8), 955–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00114-1
  • Gosselin, A., Blanchet, P., Lehoux, N., & Cimon, Y. (2018). Collaboration enables innovative timber structure adoption in construction. Buildings, 8(12), 12. Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8120183
  • Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018). How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(12), 3163–3192. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2750
  • Hartmann, A., Reymen, I. M. M. J., & Van Oosterom, G. (2008). Factors constituting the innovation adoption environment of public clients. Building Research & Information, 36(5), 436–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210802028386
  • Harty, C. (2005). Innovation in construction: A sociology of technology approach. Building Research & Information, 33(6), 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210500288605
  • Havenvid, M. I., Hulthén, K., Linné, Å, & Sundquist, V. (2016). Renewal in construction projects: Tracing effects of client requirements. Construction Management and Economics, 34(11), 790–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1208364
  • Håkansson, H., & Ingemansson, M. (2013). Industrial renewal within the construction network. Construction Management and Economics, 31(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2012.737470
  • Hedborg Bengtsson, S. (2019). Coordinated construction logistics: An innovation perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 37(5), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1528372
  • Hellström, M., Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M., & Wikström, K. (2015). Collaboration mechanisms for business models in distributed energy ecosystems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.128
  • Hendrickson, C. (2012). Sustainable energy challenges for civil engineering management. Journal of Management in Engineering, 28(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000074
  • Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Harvard Business Press.
  • IEA-PVPS. (2022). Snapshot of global PV markets 2022. I. E. Agency.
  • Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  • Jingmond, M., & Ågren, R. (2015). Unravelling causes of defects in construction. Construction Innovation.
  • Kapoor, R. (2018). Ecosystems: Broadening the locus of value creation. Journal of Organization Design, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4
  • Khanagha, S., Ansari, S., Paroutis, S., & Oviedo, L. (2022). Mutualism and the dynamics of new platform creation: A study of cisco and fog computing. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3147
  • Koskela, L., & Vrijhoef, R. (2001). Is the current theory of construction a hindrance to innovation? Building Research & Information, 29(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210110039266
  • Lindahl, J. (2015). National survey report of PV power applications in Sweden in 2015. In Institution: Swedish energy agency 2021 (p. 9). I. E. Agency.
  • Lindahl, J., Oller Westerberg, A., & Vanky, K. (2022). National survey report of PV power applications in Sweden 2021. I. E. Agency.
  • Lindgren, J. (2018). Diffusion of systemic innovations in the construction sector. Halmstad University Press.
  • Lindgren, J., & Emmitt, S. (2017). Diffusion of a systemic innovation: A longitudinal case study of a Swedish multi-storey timber housebuilding system. Construction Innovation, 17(1), 25–44.
  • Lingens, B., Miehé, L., & Gassmann, O. (2021). The ecosystem blueprint: How firms shape the design of an ecosystem according to the surrounding conditions. Long Range Planning, 54(2), 102043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.102043
  • Loosemore, M., & Tan, C. C. (2000). Occupational bias in construction management research. Construction Management and Economics, 18(7), 757–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461900433041
  • Lundberg, O., Nylén, D., & Sandberg, J. (2022). Unpacking construction site digitalization: The role of incongruence and inconsistency in technological frames. Construction Management and Economics, 40(11–12), 987–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2021.1980896
  • Ma, Y., Rong, K., Mangalagiu, D., Thornton, T. F., & Zhu, D. (2018). Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323
  • Magrini, A., Lentini, G., Cuman, S., Bodrato, A., & Marenco, L. (2020). From nearly zero energy buildings (NZEB) to positive energy buildings (PEB): The next challenge – The most recent European trends with some notes on the energy analysis of a forerunner PEB example. Developments in the Built Environment.
  • Mohammed, S., & Ringseis, E. (2001). Cognitive diversity and consensus in group decision making: The role of inputs, processes, and outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 310–335. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2943
  • Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Orstavik, F. (2019). Activity systems and innovation in project-based production: The case of construction. In The connectivity of innovation in the construction industry (pp. 267–283). Routledge.
  • Osseweijer, F. J., Van Den Hurk, L. B., Teunissen, E. J., & Van Sark, W. G. (2017). A review of the Dutch ecosystem for building integrated photovoltaics. Energy Procedia, 111, 974–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.260
  • Ottosson, J. (2018). Hållbart samhälle – nya brandtekniska utmaningar. F. A. B. teknik.
  • Ørngreen, R., & Levinsen, K. (2017). Workshops as a research methodology. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(1), 70-81.
  • Palm, A. (2022). Innovation systems for technology diffusion: An analytical framework and two case studies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121821
  • Papadonikolaki, E. (2018). Loosely coupled systems of innovation: Aligning BIM adoption with implementation in Dutch construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(6), Article 05018009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000644
  • Papadonikolaki, E., van Oel, C., & Kagioglou, M. (2019). Organising and managing boundaries: A structurational view of collaboration with building information modelling (BIM). International Journal of Project Management, 37(3), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.010
  • Peltokorpi, A., Talmar, M., Castrén, K., & Holmström, J. (2019). Designing an organizational system for economically sustainable demand-side management in district heating and cooling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 219, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.106
  • Pulkka, L., Ristimäki, M., Rajakallio, K., & Junnila, S. (2016). Applicability and benefits of the ecosystem concept in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 34(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1179773
  • Ridder, H.-G. (2017). The theory contribution of case study research designs. Business Research, 10(2), 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0045-z
  • Ritala, P., Agouridas, V., Assimakopoulos, D., & Gies, O. (2013). Value creation and capture mechanisms in innovation ecosystems: A comparative case study. International Journal of Technology Management, 63(3–4), 244–267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2013.056900
  • Rose, T., Manley, K., & Widen, K. (2019). Do firm-level barriers to construction product innovation adoption vary according to position in the supply chain? Construction Innovation, 19(2), 212–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-11-2017-0090
  • Shih, L., & Chou, T. (2011). Customer concerns about uncertainty and willingness to pay in leasing solar power systems. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 8(3), 523–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326238
  • Shipilov, A., & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92–121. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0121
  • Slaughter, E. S. (1998). Models of construction innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(3), 226–231. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1998)124:3(226)
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
  • Strupeit, L., & Palm, A. (2016). Overcoming barriers to renewable energy diffusion: Business models for customer-sited solar photovoltaics in Japan, Germany and the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.120
  • Taylor, J., & Levitt, R. (2004). Understanding and managing systemic innovation in project-based industries. In D. Slevin, D. Cleland, & J. Pinto (Eds.), Innovations: Project management research (pp. 83–99). Project Management Institute.
  • Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2014). The fifth facet: The ecosystem as an organisational field. DRUID Society Conference.
  • Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2020). Innovation ecosystems in management: An organizing typology. In Oxford encyclopaedia of business and management. Oxford University Press.
  • Thomas, L. D., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2022). Processes of ecosystem emergence. Technovation, 115, 102441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102441
  • Valkokari, K. (2015). Business, innovation, and knowledge ecosystems: How they differ and how to survive and thrive within them. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(8), 17–24.
  • van Oorschot, J. A., Halman, J. I., & Hofman, E. (2021). The adoption of green modular innovations in the Dutch housebuilding sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 319, 128524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128524
  • Vennström, A., & Eriksson, P. E. (2010). Client perceived barriers to change of the construction process. Construction Innovation, 10(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1108/14714171011037156
  • Vigren, O. (2022). Digitalisation, sustainability, and ecosystems: An application of social network analysis to the real estate sector KTH. Royal Institute of Technology.
  • Viholainen, N., Kylkilahti, E., Autio, M., Pöyhönen, J., & Toppinen, A. (2021). Bringing ecosystem thinking to sustainability-driven wooden construction business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126029
  • Vroon, T., Teunissen, E., Drent, M., Negro, S. O., & van Sark, W. G. (2021). Escaping the niche market: An innovation system analysis of the Dutch building integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 155, 111912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111912
  • Winch, G., & Leiringer, R. (2016). Owner project capabilities for infrastructure development: A review and development of the “strong owner” concept. International Journal of Project Management, 34(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.02.002