Methodological debate in poverty studies: towards ‘participatory qual–quant’?

References

• Anand, S., and Sen, A., 1994. "Human Development Index: Methodology and Measurement". In: Occasional Paper no. 12. New York, NY: UNDP; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Barahona, C., and Levy, S., 2007. The best of both worlds: producing national statistics using participatory methods, World Development 35 (2) (2007), pp. 326–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P., 1989. Bardhan, P., ed. Conversations Between Economists and Anthropologists – Methodological Issues in Measuring Economic Change in Rural India. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 1983. Rural Development: Putting The Last First. London: Longman; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 1994. The origins and practice of Participatory Rural Appraisal, World Development 22 (7) (1994), pp. 953–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R., 2003. Participation and numbers, PLA Notes 47 (2003), pp. 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane, G., 1980. Policy studies and anthropology, Current Anthropology 21 (4) (1980), pp. 445–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandekar, V. M., and Rath, N., 1971. Poverty in India, Economic and Political Weekly (1971), 2 and 9 January.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, V., and Potter, R. B., 2006. Desai, V., and Potter, R. B., eds. Doing Development Research. New Delhi: Sage; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A., 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fields, G., 2004. Dualism in the labor market: a perspective on the Lewis Model after half a century, The Manchester School 72 (6) (2004), pp. 724–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, R. D., 2002. "Anthropologists and development". In: Desai, V., and Potter, R. B., eds. The Companion to Development Studies. London: Arnold; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Harriss, J., 2002. The case for cross-disciplinary approaches in international development, World Development 30 (3) (2002), pp. 487–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, S., and Mohan, G., 2005. Relocating participation within a radical politics of development, Development and Change 36 (2) (2005), pp. 237–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, P., 1986. Development Economics On Trial: The Anthropological Case For Prosecution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hoben, A., 1982. Anthropologists and development, Annual Review of Anthropology 11 (1982), pp. 349–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, D., and Shepherd, A., 2003. Conceptualizing chronic poverty, World Development 31 (3) (2003), pp. 403–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, D., and Toye, J., 2006. The case for cross-disciplinary social science research on poverty, inequality and well-being, Journal of Development Studies 42 (7) (2006), pp. 1085–1107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jodha, N. S., 1988. Poverty debate in India: a minority view, Economic and Political Weekly (1988), pp. 2421–8, Special Number.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., 2002. Economics, social science and development, World Development 30 (3) (2002), pp. 477–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., 2003. Kanbur, R., ed. Q-Squared: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Poverty Appraisal. New Delhi: Permanent Black; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., and Shaffer, P., 2007. Epistemology, normative theory and poverty analysis, World Development 35 (2) (2007), pp. 183–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannappan, S., 1995. The economics of development: the procrustean bed of mainstream economics, Economic Development and Cultural Change 43 (4) (1995), pp. 863–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna, A., 2004. Escaping poverty and becoming poor: who gains, who loses and why?, World Development 32 (1) (2004), pp. 121–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal, D., 1983 [1997]. The Poverty of ‘Development Economics’. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs; 1983 [1997].
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E., 1983. Let's take the con out of econometrics, The American Economic Review 73 (1) (1983), pp. 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., 1973. Anthropology and colonialism, Current Anthropology 14 (5) (1973), pp. 581–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B., 1929. Practical anthropology, Africa 2 (1) (1929), pp. 22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mayoux, L., and Chambers, R., 2005. Reversing the paradigm: quantification, participatory methods and pro-poor impact assessment, Journal of International Development 17 (2) (2005), pp. 271–98.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N., 1983. The rhetoric of economics, Journal of Economic Literature 21 (2) (1983), pp. 481–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, R., 2004. Constructing poverty trends in Uganda: a multidisciplinary perspective, Development and Change 35 (3) (2004), pp. 499–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, G. M., 2000. "The old generation of development economists and the new". In: Meier, G. M., and Stiglitz, J. E., eds. Frontiers of Development Economics: The Future in Perspective. New York, NY: The World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Peet, R., and Hartwick, E., 1999. Theories of Development. London: The Guilford Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, V., 2002. Experiments in “participatory econometrics”: improving the connection between economic analysis and the real world', Economic and Political Weekly (2002), 18 May.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, V., and Walton, M., 2004. Rao, V., and Walton, M., eds. Culture and Public Action. New Delhi: Permanent Black; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Robb, C. M., 2002. Can the Poor Influence Policy? Participatory Poverty Assessments in the Developing World. Washington: IMF/The World Bank; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., 1991. Anthropological perspectives on the household, IDS Bulletin 22 (1) (1991), pp. 60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowntree, B. S., 1910 [1980]. Poverty: A Study of Town Life. New York & London: Garland Publishing; 1910 [1980].
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, P., 1998. Gender, poverty and deprivation: evidence from the Republic of Guinea, World Development 26 (12) (1998), pp. 2119–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, P., 2001. New Thinking on Poverty; Implications for Poverty Reduction Strategies. Presented at Draft of the Paper Prepared for UNDESA Expert Group Meeting, United Nations. New York, NY, 8–9, November.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, P., 2005. Assumptions matter: reflections on the Kanbur typology, Focaal – European Journal of Anthropology 45 (1) (2005), pp. 18–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, K., Devereux, S., and Amare, Y., 2003. Destitution in Ethiopia's Northeastern Highlands (Amhara National Regional State), (2003), a policy research project by IDS, Sussex and SC-UK, Ethiopia, funded by UK Department for International Development (DFID).
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A., and Tribe, M., 2004. The Nature of Epistemology and Methodology in Development Studies: What Do We Mean By “Rigour”?. Presented at paper prepared for DSA Annual Conference. London, 6, November.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, R., and Murphy, C. N., 1996. The epistemology of poverty and the poverty of epistemology in IPE: mystery, blindness and invisibility, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 25 (3) (1996), pp. 681–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H., 2002. Combining quantitative and qualitative approaches in poverty analysis, World Development 30 (3) (2002), pp. 511–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, C. K., 1986. Methodological debate in economics, World Development 14 (2) (1986), pp. 143–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolcock, M., 2007. Higher education, policy schools and development studies: what should master's degree students be taught?, Journal of International Development 19 (1) (2007), pp. 55–73.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 1990. World Development Report: Focus on Poverty. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, for the World Bank; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank, 2000. World Development Report: Attacking Poverty. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, for the World Bank; 2000.
   Google Scholar