Successful or not? Evidence, emergence, and development management

References

• Baert, P., 2005. Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, D., 1994. The Business of Talk: Organisations in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, E., and Harrison, E., 1998. Whose Development? Ethnography of Aid. London: Zed Books; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., 2004. Narratives in Social Science Research. London: Sage; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dar, S., and Cooke, B., 2008. Dar, S., and Cooke, B., eds. The New Development Management: Critiquing the Dual Modernization. London: Zed Books; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., 2005. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York, NY: Kessinger; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Dichter, T., 2003. Despite Good Intentions: Why Development Assistance to the Third World Has Failed. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields, American Sociological Review 48 (2) (1983), pp. 147–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 1939/2000. The Civilising Process. Oxford: Blackwell; 1939/2000.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 1978. What is Sociology?. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., 2005. Donors’ learning difficulties. Increased aid: minimising problems, maximising gains, IDS Bulletin 36 (2005), pp. 98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., 2006. Eyben, R., ed. Relationships for Aid. London: Earthscan; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, J., 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development’, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Enquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, H. G., 1975. Truth and Method. London: Continuum Books; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A., 1993. New Rules of Sociological Method. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., 2002. The Emergence of Leadership: Linking Self-organisation and Ethics. London: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, G., and Stirrat, R., 1997. Grillo, G., and Stirrat, R., eds. Discourses of Development: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Berg Publishers; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, P., 2005. Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 2000. When things strike back: a possible contribution of “science studies” to the social sciences, British Journal of Sociology 51 (1) (2000), pp. 107–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D., 2001. The Management of Non-Governmental Development Organisations. London: Routledge; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M., 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development and the Practice of Politics. London, NC: Duke University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H., 1934. Mind, Self and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviourist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T., 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D., 2005. Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London: Pluto Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D., and Lewis, D., 2005. Mosse, D., and Lewis, D., eds. The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development. London: Pluto Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mowles, C., 2007. Promises of transformation: just how different are development INGOs, Journal of International Development 19 (3) (2007), pp. 401–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mowles, C., 2008a. Values in international development organisations: negotiating non-negotiables, Development in Practice 18 (1) (2008a).
   Google Scholar
• Mowles, C., 2008b. What contribution can insights from the complexity sciences make to the theory and practice of development management?, Journal of International Development 20 (2008b), pp. 804–20.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and Sutton, R., 2006. Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-based Management. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Quarles van Ufford, P., and Giri, A. K., 2003. Quarles van Ufford, P., and Giri, A. K., eds. A Moral Critique of Development: In Search of Global Responsibilities. London: Routledge; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D., 2006. Is there such a thing as “evidence based management”?, Academy of Management Review 31 (2) (2006), pp. 256–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C., 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, P., 2002. Changing Conversations in Organisations: A Complexity Approach to Change. London: Routledge; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, R., 2007. Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity. London: Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tsoukas, H., and Hatch, M. J., 2001. Complex thinking, complex practice: the case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity, Human Relations 54 (8) (2001), pp. 979–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., Crowther, S., and Shepherd, A., 1997. Standardising Development: Influences on UK NGOs’ Policies and Procedures. Oxford: World View Publishing; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, T., Bornstein, L., and Chapman, J., 2006. The Aid Chain: Commitment and Coercion in Development NGOs. London: IT Publishing; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, N., 1948. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1948.
   Google Scholar