Should the C4D expert survive? Rethinking expertise in communication and innovation

References

• Bloom, L., and R. Faulkner. 2016. “Innovation Spaces: Lessons from the United Nations.” Third World Quarterly 6597 (March): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2014. “Australian Aid: Promoting Prosperity, Reducing Poverty, Enhancing Stability.” Accessed July 15, 2017. http://dfat.gov.au/about-us/publications/Documents/australian-aid-development-policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2015. “Address to Launch of InnovationXchange – InnovationXchange, Canberra.” Accessed July 15, 2017. http://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/Pages/2015/jb_sp_150323a.aspx?w=tb1CaGpkPX%2FlS0K%2Bg9ZKEg%3D%3D.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (2012 ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabian, C., and M. Amartullo. 2016. “Innovation for International Development: Navigating the Paths and Pitfalls.” In Innovation for International Development: Navigating the Paths and Pitfalls, edited by B. Ramalingam, and K. Bound, 105–115. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• Florida, R. 2004. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, C. and S. Restrepo-Estrada 1998. Communicating for development: human change for survival. London: IB Tauris and Co Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. 2011. “Calculating Compassion: Accounting for Some Categorical Practices in International Development.” In Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, edited by David Mosse, 6: 33–56. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gumucio-Dagron, A. 2008. “Vertical Minds Versus Horizontal Cultures: An Overview of Participatory Process and Experiences.” In Communication for Development and Social Change, edited by J. Servaes, 68–82. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gumucio-Dagron, A., and C. Rodríguez. 2006. “Time to Call Things by Their Name.” Media Development 53 (3): 9.
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. 2015. “Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship.” Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (5): 799–824. doi: 10.1177/0162243915578486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, K. 2003. Subsidy or Self-Respect? Participatory Total Community Sanitation in Bangladesh. Brighton: IDS. Accessed July 15, 2017. http://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/123456789/3979.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., and I. Scoones. 2006. The Slow Race: Making Technology Work for the Poor. London: Demos. Accessed July 15, 2017. https://www.demos.co.uk/files/The Slow Race.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., A. Sumner, and L. Waldman. 2008. “Discourses, Dynamics and Disquiet: Multiple Knowledges in Science, Society and Development.” Journal of International Development 20 (6): 727–738. doi: 10.1002/jid.1492
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2011. “Rendering Society Technical: Government Through Community and the Ethnographic Turn at the World Bank in Indonesia.” In Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, edited by D. Mosse, 57–80. New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lindtner, S. 2014. “Hackerspaces and the Internet of Things in China: How Makers Are Reinventing Industrial Production, Innovation, and the Self.” China Information 28: 145–167. doi: 10.1177/0920203X14529881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, R. 2012. Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, R., and K. Nordenstreng. 2006. “Great Media and Communication Debates: WSIS and the MacBride Report.” Information Technologies and International Development 3 (4): 15–36. doi: 10.1162/itid.2007.3.4.15
   Google Scholar
• Manyozo, L. 2017. Communicating Development with Communities. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McGoey, L. 2015. No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. 2001. “‘People’s Knowledge’, Participation and Patronage: Operations and Representations in Rural Development.” In Participation: The New Tyranny?, edited by B. Cooke and U. Kothari. London: Zed Books, pp 16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D., ed. 2011a. Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development. New York: Berghan.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. 2011b. “Introduction: The Anthropology of Expertise and Professionals in International Development.” In Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development, edited by D. Mosse, 1–31. New York: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Noske-Turner, Jessica. 2017. Rethinking Media Development Through Evaluation: Beyond Freedom. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Noske-Turner, J., and J. Tacchi. 2016. “Grounding Innovation in Pacific Media Communication for Development Projects A Demand-Driven Focus.” Information Technologies & International Development 12 (4): 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Principles for Digital Development. n.d. “Design with the User.” Accessed July 15, 2017. https://digitalprinciples.org/principle/design-with-the-user.
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, R., and W. Quarry. 2010. “Communication for Another Development.” Development 53 (1): 54–57. doi: 10.1057/dev.2009.92
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwittay, A. 2014. “Designing Development: Humanitarian Design in the Financial Inclusion Assemblage.” PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 37 (1): 29–47. doi: 10.1111/plar.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, P., and E. van de Fliert. 2014. Interrogating the Theory and Practice of Communication for Social Change: The Basis For a Renewal. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Toyama, K. 2015. Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change From the Cult of Technology. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2016a. Communication for Development: An Evaluation of UNICEF’s Capacity and Action. New York: UNICEF.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2016b. “Young Makers in Vietnam Work to Change the Lives of Children with Disabilities.” Accessed July 15, 2017. http://unicefstories.org/2016/07/23/young-makers-in-vietnam-work-to-change-the-lives-of-children-with-disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2016c. “UNICEF Is Investing in Tech Start-Ups.” Accessed July 15, 2017. http://unicefstories.org/2016/11/16/unicef-is-investing-in-tech-start-ups.
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF. 2016d. “C4D Learning Programme 2016.” Accessed July 15, 2017. https://agora.unicef.org/course/info.php?id=1196.
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2008. “The Institutional Challenges of Participatory Communication in International aid.” Social Identities 14 (4): 505–522. doi: 10.1080/13504630802212009
   Google Scholar
• Waisbord, S. 2015. “Three Challenges for Communication and Global Social Change.” Communication Theory 25 (2): 144–165. doi: 10.1111/comt.12068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins, K. G., and F. Enghel. 2013. “The Privatization of Development Through Global Communication Industries: Living Proof?” Media, Culture & Society 35 (2): 165–181. doi: 10.1177/0163443712468606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar