Group lending through an SHG bank-linkage programme in India: transaction costs and social benefits

References

• Adams, D. W. 1994. Transaction Costs in Decentralized Rural Financial Markets, Studies in Rural Finance, Occasional Paper No. 2039. Columbus: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D. W., D. H. Graham, and J. D. VonPischke. 1984. Undermining Rural Development with Cheap Credit. Boulder, CO: West View Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, D. W., and G. I. Nehman. 1979. “Borrowing Costs and the Demand for Rural Credit.” Journal of Development Studies 15 (2): 165–176. doi: 10.1080/00220387908421712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, D. W., and R. C. Vogel. 1986. “Rural Financial Markets in Low Income Countries: Recent Controversies and Lessons.” World Development 14: 477–487. doi: 10.1016/0305-750X(86)90064-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adolph, B. 2003. The Role of Self Help Groups in Rural Non-farm Employment. Accessed July 14, 2015. www.nri.org/projects/rnfe/pub/papers/roleofselfhelpgroups.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., E. Duflo, R. Glennerster, and C. Kinnan. 2009. The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Economics and Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Chavan, P., and R. Ramkumar. 2005. “Interest Rates on Micro Credit.” In Financial Liberalization and Rural Credit in India, edited by V. K. Ramchandran, and M. Swaminathan, 147–156. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gamin, H. 1994. “Rural Credit Markets and Institutional Reforms in Developing Countries: Potential and Problems.” Savings and Development 18: 169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Ghatak, M., and T. W. Guinnane. 1999. “The Economics of Lending with Joint Liability: Theory and Practice.” Journal of Development Economics 60 (1): 195–228. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00041-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of India. 2007. Union Budget of India (2007-08). Accessed July 14, 2015. www.indiabudget.nic.in.
   Google Scholar
• Houseini, S. S., M. Khaledi, M. Ghorbani, and D. G. Brewin. 2011. “An Analysis of Transaction Costs of Obtaining Credits in Rural Iran.” Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 14 (2): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian Institute of Management. 2014. Study of Transaction Cost – Perspectives of SHG and MFI Clients. Project Report. Lucknow: IIM.
   Google Scholar
• John, S., and G. Paul. 2010. Comparative Analysis of MFI and SHG-Banking Models. Anand: Institute of Rural Management.
   Google Scholar
• Karduck, S., and H. D. Seibel. 2004. Transaction Costs of Self-help Groups: A Study of NABARD’s SHG Banking Programme in India. Accessed July 24, 2015. www.microfinancegateway.org/sites/default/files/mfg-en-case-study-transaction-costs-of-self-help-groups-a-study-of-nabards-shg-banking-programme-in-india-2004.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy, R., and M. Ratnaparkhi. 2002. “Micro-finance in the New Economy – India’s Experience.” Paper presented at the International Association of Official Statistics Conference, May.
   Google Scholar
• Ladman, J. R. 1984. “Loan-transactions Costs, Credit Rationing, and Market Structure: The Case of Bolivia.”.
   Google Scholar
• Liedholm, C. 1985. Small Scale Enterprise Credit Schemes: Administrative Costs and the Role of Inventory Norms, Working Paper No.25. East Lansing: Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Llanto, G. M., and R. T. Chua. 1996. Transaction Costs of Lending to the Poor: A Case Study of Two Philippine Non-Governmental Organisations. Brisbane: Foundation for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Manisha. 2016. “Impact of Self Help Group in Socio Economic Development of India.” Paper presented in the International Conference on Recent Innovations in Science, Engineering and Management, Delhi, March 20.
   Google Scholar
• Masuko, L., and L. Marufu. 2003. The Determinants of Transaction Costs and Access to Credit. Geneva: International Labor Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L. R., and E. C. Cuevas. 1990. Reducing the Transaction Costs of Financial Intermediation: Theory and Innovations. Columbus: Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Morduch, J. 1999. “The Microfinance Promise.” Journal of Economic Literature XXXVII: 1569–1614. doi: 10.1257/jel.37.4.1569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moses, E. 2011. “An Overview of Microfinance Consensus Guidelines: Guiding Micro Finance in India. International Referred Principles on Regulation and Supervision of Research Journal, RNI-RAJBIL 2009/29954. Vol. III (4): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• NABARD. 2007. SHG Bank Linkage Programme in Karnataka: 2006-07. Bangalore: NABARD Karnataka Regional Office.
   Google Scholar
• Nanda, Y. 1995. Significance of Establishing Linkages with Self-Help Groups and Banks. Kobe: The Global Development Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Nanjundappa, D. M. 2002. Report of the High Power Committee for Redressal of Regional Imbalances in Karnataka. Bangalore: Government of Karnataka.
   Google Scholar
• Olomola, A. S. 1999. “Determinants of Smallholders’ Transaction Cost of Procuring Non-Bank Loans in Nigeria.” Savings and Development 23: 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Pareek, N.S. 2011. “Micro Finance and Financial Inclusion.” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2017007.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan, N. C. 2013. Persistence of Informal Credit in Rural India: Evidence from All-India Debt and Investment Survey and Beyond, RBI Working Paper Series, Wps (Depr): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Rajasekhar, D. 2004. Micro-finance, Poverty Alleviation and Empowerment of Women: A Study of Two NGOs from Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. ISEC Monograph Series-4, Bengaluru-ISEC.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, M., B. P Vani and Veerashekharappa. 2018. “Economic and Social Benefits of SHG-Bank Linkage Programme in Karnataka”, ISEC Working Paper No. 415. Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, M., and M. Bhattacharjee. 2017. Farm Nonfarm Linkage in Rural India. Project Report. Bengaluru: ISEC.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, M., B. P. Vani, and M. Bhattacharjee. 2011. “Credibility of Equal Access to Credit: Does Gender Matter?” Economic and Political Weekly 46 (33): 76–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, M., B.P. Vani and Veerashekharappa. 2017. “Self-help groups for India’s financial inclusion: Do effective costs of borrowing limit their operation?” ICDD Working Paper No. 19. Kassel: International Center for Development and Decent Work, University of Kassel, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Rajeev, M., B. P. Vani, and Veerashekharappa. 2015. “Financial Inclusion Through SHGs: Understanding Quality and Sustainability of SHGs in Karnataka State. Bangalore: Institute for Social and Economic Change. Monograph Series-40, Bengaluru-ISEC.
   Google Scholar
• Ranade, A., N. B. Patil, P. Bafna, and N. Agarwal. 2006. Transaction Cost of Lending in Rural Finance, IFMR Working Paper Series. Chennai: Institute for Financial Management and Research.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, P. M. 2010. Impact of Self Help Group –Bank Linkage Programme and Its Role on the Upliftment of the Poor. Accessed 24 July, 2015. www.dypatil.edu/schools/management/wp-content/uploads/2015/11.
   Google Scholar
• Reserve Bank of India. 2011. Master Circular for the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme. Accessed January 14, 2016. www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_ViewMasCirculardetails.aspx?id = 6531.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas, M., and L. A. Rojas. 1997. “Transaction Costs in Mexico’s Preferential Credit.” Development Policy Review 15: 23–46. doi: 10.1111/1467-7679.00024
   Google Scholar
• Saito, K., and D. Villaneuva. 1981. “Transaction Costs of Credit to Small Scale Sector in the Philippines.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 29: 631–640. doi: 10.1086/451275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibel, H. D., and S. Karduck. 2004. Transaction Costs of Self-help Groups in NABARD’s SHG Banking Programme: A Study in Karnataka State. Mumbai: NABARD.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar, S. 2007. “Transaction Costs in Group Microcredit in India.” Management Decision 45 (8): 1331–1342. doi: 10.1108/00251740710819069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, F. 2005. “Access use and Contribution of Microfinance in India: Findings from a National Survey.” Economic and Political Weekly April 23: 1714–1719.
   Google Scholar
• Suran, B. S. 2007. Banking with the Poor: NABARD’s Experience. Mumbai: NABARD.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy, V., and B. K. Tulasimala. 2011. “Financial Intermediaries and Economic Development: A Study of Transaction Costs of Borrowing for the Poor.” International Journal of Banking and Finance 8 (3): 54–72.
   Google Scholar
• Tankha, A. 2002. “Self-help Groups as Financial Intermediaries in India: Cost of Promotion, Sustainability and Impact.” Study prepared for ICCO and Cordaid. Accessed 14 August 2018. www.microfinancegateway.org/library/self-help-groups-financial-intermediaries-india-cost-promotion-sustainability-and-impact. Last Visited 14/08/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Untalan, T., and C. Cuevas. 1989. “Transaction Cost and the Viability of Rural Financial Intermediaries.” Journal of Philippine Development 16: 37–87.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 1990. Issues in Informal Finance: In Financial Systems and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar