Institutionalisation of co-production in the reform of a public enterprise: insights from the Philippines

References

• Ahlers, R., F. Cleaver, M. Rusca, and K. Schwartz. 2014. “Informal Space in the Urban Waterscape: Disaggregation and Co-Production of Water Services.” Water Alternatives 7 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayson, D. 2018. “Community Mapping and Data Gathering for City Planning in the Philippines.” Environment & Urbanization 30 (2): 501–518. doi: 10.1177/0956247818767338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, K. 1998. “Speech acts.” Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy,1–2. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bendapudi, N., and R. P. Leone. 2003. “Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production.” Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 14–28. doi: 10.1509/jmkg.67.1.14.18592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. L., and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L., and S. P. Osborne. 2012. “Risk and Innovation.” Public Management Review 15 (2): 186–208. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2012.707681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepiku, D., and F. Giordano. 2014. “Co-Production in Developing Countries: Insights from the Community Health Workers Experience.” Public Management Review 16 (3): 317–340. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.822535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooqi, S. 2016. “Co-Production: What Makes Co-Production Work? Evidence from Pakistan.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (4): 381–395. doi: 10.1108/IJPSM-10-2015-0190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., T. Brandsen, and M. Honingh. 2015. “User Co-Production of Public Service Delivery: An Uncertainty Approach.” Public Policy and Administration 30 (2): 145–164. doi: 10.1177/0952076715572362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. 2006. “Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance.” Public Administration Review 66 (Special Issue): 66–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., and M. Moore. 2004. “Institutionalised Co-Production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments.” Journal of Development Studies 40 (4): 31–49. doi: 10.1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C., and R. Chad. 2016. “Ideals of Inclusion in Deliberation.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12 (2): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, F.-X., G. Majone, and V. Ostrom. 1986. “Experience, Theory and Design.” In Guidance, Control, and Evaluation in the Public Sector: The Bielefeld Interdisciplinary Project, edited by F.-X. Kaufmann, G. Majone, and V. Ostrom, Volume 4, 787–804. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., and T. Bovaird. 2016. “User and Community Co-Production of Public Services: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (13): 1–29. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasan, R., and C. Castel. 2010. “Improving the Financial Management of Local Economic Enterprises.” Discussion Paper Series No. 2010–25. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H., M. Alexander, M. Gralepois, P. Matczak, and H. Mees. 2018. “Typologies of Citizen Co-Production in Flood Risk Governance.” Environmental Science & Policy 89: 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Munno, G., and T. Nabatchi. 2014. “Public Deliberation and Co-Production in the Political and Electoral Arena: A Citizens’ Jury Approach.” Journal of Public Deliberation 10 (2): 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M. I., and H. Guo. 2012. “Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2): 267–288. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mur038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 1996. “Designing Institutions in East European Transitions.” In The Theory of Institutional Design, edited by R. Goodin, 199–226. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. 2011. “Crisis and Innovation of Liberal Democracy: Can Deliberation Be Institutionalised?” Czech Sociological Review 47 (3): 447–472.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2017. “Public Management Research Over the Decades: What are we Writing About?” Public Management Review 19 (2): 109–113. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1252142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., and K. Strokosch. 2013. “It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives.” British Journal of Management 24: 31–47. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. 2012. “Co-production and Third Sector Social Services in Europe: Some Concepts and Evidence.” Voluntas 23: 1102–1118. doi: 10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippine Council for Health Research and Development 2017. Accessed 12 July 2017. www.pchrd.dost.gov.ph/index.php/news/6160-research-translation-gaps-cited-in-policy-forum-3.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. 1957. Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Siebers, V., and J. Torfing. 2018. “Co-Creation as a New Form of Citizen Engagement: Comparing Danish and Dutch Experiences at the Local Government Level.” International Public Management Review 18 (2): 187–208.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., T. Brandsen, and B. Verschuere. 2018. “The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production.” In Tn Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services, edited by T. Brandsen, B. Verschuere, and T. Steen, 284–293. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suyeon, J., and T. Nabatchi. 2016. “Back to Basics: Advancing the Study and Practice of Coproduction.” International Journal of Public Administration 39 (13): 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar