The effects of the Malawi Farm Input Subsidy Program on household per-capita consumption convergence

References

• Bardhan, P., and D. Mookherjee. 2011. “Subsidized Farm Input Programs and Agricultural Performance: A Farm-Level Analysis of West Bengal’s Green Revolution, 1982–1995.” American Economic Journal-Applied Economics 3: 186–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, C. B. 2010. “Smallholder Market Participation: Concepts and Evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa.” In Food Security in Africa: Market Trade Policy for Staple Foods in Earstern and Soutrhern Africa, edited by A. Sarris, and J. Morrison, 41–76. Cheltenham, UK: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Benfica, R., and T. Kilic. 2016. The Effects of Smallholder Agricultural Involvement on Household Food Consumption and Dietary Diversity: Evidence from Malaw. (04). Rome.
   Google Scholar
• Chibwana, C., M. Fisher, and G. Shively. 2012. “Cropland Allocation Effects of Agricultural Input Subsidies in Malawi.” World Development 40 (1): 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibwana, C., G. Shively, M. Fischer, C. Jumbe, and W. Masters. 2014. “Measuring the Impacts of Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Programme.” African Journal of Agricultire and Resource Economics 9 (2): 132–147.
   Google Scholar
• Chinsinga, B. 2005. “Practical and Policy Dilemmas of Targeting Free Inputs.” In Starter Packs: A Strategy to Fight Hunger in Developing Countries?, edited by S. Levy, 141–153. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhury, H., Z. L. Kopacsi, G. Saxena, and N. Mishra. 2021. “The Ethical Dimension in Political Market Orientation: A Framework for Evaluating the Impact of India’s Look East Policy on Regional Income Convergence.” Journal of Business Ethics 168 (2): 353–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, G., P. Kabembe, P. Sanchez, A. Malik, R. Flor, R. Harawa, P. Nkhoma, et al. 2009. “Input Subsidies to Improve Smallholder Maize Productivity in Malawi: Toward an African Green Revolution.” Plos Biology 7 (1): e1000023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorward, A., and E. Chirwa. 2011. “The Malawi Agricultural Input Subsidy Programme: 2005/06 to 2008/09.” International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 9 (1): 232–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorward, A., J. Kydd, J. Morrison, and I. Urey. 2004. “A Policy Agenda for Pro-Poor Agricultural Growth.” Wolrd Development 32: 73–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, T., A. E. Kentikelenis, B. Reinsberg, T. H. Stubbs, and L. P. King. 2019. “How Structural Adjustment Programs Affect Inequality: A Disaggregated Analysis of IMF Conditionality, 1980–2014.” Social Science Research 80 (December 2018): 83–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganong, P., and D. Shoag. 2017. “Why has Regional Income Convergence in the U.S. Declined?” Journal of Urban Economics 102: 76–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, M. 2015. “Agricultural Subsidies: Resurgig Interest in a Perrennial Debate.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1): 83–105.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Malawi. 2019. Final Report on the Implementation of Inputs Susbidy Programme (2018–2019). Lilongwe, Malawi.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Malawi. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Harou, A. P. 2018. “Unraveling the Effect of Targeted Input Subsidies on Dietary Diversity in Household Consumption and Child Nutrition: The Case of Malawi.” World Development 106: 124–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harou, A. P., Y. Liu, C. B. Barrett, and L. You. 2017. “Variable Returns to Fertiliser Use and the Geography of Poverty: Experimental and Simulation Evidence from Malawi.” Journal of African Economies 26 (3): 342–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, S., and R. Lunduka. 2010. Too Poor To Be Efficient? Impacts of The Targeted Fertilizer Subsidy Program in Malawi on Farm Plot Level Input Use, Crop Choice and Land Productivity.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, S., and R. Lunduka. 2013. “Who Benefit from Malawi’s Targeted Farm Input Subsidy Program?” Forum for Development Studies 40 (1): 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, S. T., and R. Lunduka. 2018. Too Poor to be Efficient? Impacts of the Targeted Fertilizer Subsidy Programme in Malawi on Farm Plot Level Input Use, Crop Choice and Land Productivity. Noragric.
   Google Scholar
• Jayne, T. S., N. M. Mason, W. J. Burke, and J. Ariga. 2018. “Review: Taking Stock of Africa’s Second-Generation Agricultural Input Subsidy Programs.” Food Policy 75: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiyatsa, S., J. Ricker-Gilbert, and C. Jumbe. 2019. “What Does Malawi’s Fertiliser Programme do to Private Sector Fertiliser Sales? A Quasi Experimental Field Study.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (2): 332–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamba, W. 2013. Input Subsidies and Their Effect on Crop Land Allocation, Agricultural Productivity and Child Nutrion: Evidence from Malawi. American Univeristy.
   Google Scholar
• Karamba, R. W., and P. C. Winters. 2015. “Gender and Agricultural Productivity: Implications of the Farm Input Subsidy Program in Malawi.” Agricultural Economics 46 (3): 357–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaye, F., and M. Hutchison. 2018. “Are Increases in Maize Production in Malawi Due to Favourable Climate or the Farm Input Subsidy Program (FISP)?” In Theory and Practice of Climate Adaptation, edited by F. Alves, W. Leal Filho, and U. Azeiteiro, 375–390. New York City: Springer US.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, V., D. Boughton, and N. Lenski. 2010. Malawi Agricultural Inputs Subsidy Program Evaluation of the 2007/08 and 2008/09 Input Supply Sector Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Lewbel, A. 2012. “Using Heteroscedasticity to Identify and Estimate Mismeasured and Endogenous Regressor Models.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 30 (1): 67–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewbel, A. 2018. “Identification and Estimation Using Heteroscedasticity Without Instruments: The Binary Endogenous Regressor Case.” Economics Letters 165: 10–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunduka, R., J. Ricker-Gilbert, and M. Fisher. 2013. “What are the Farm-Level Impacts of Malawi’s Farm Input Subsidy Program? A Critical Review.” Agricultural Economics 44 (6): 563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, N. M., and J. Ricker-Gilbert. 2013. “Disrupting Demand for Commercial Seed: Input Subsidies in Malawi and Zambia.” World Development 45: 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msuya, E., S. Hisano, and T. Nariu. 2008. “Explaining Productivity Variation among Smallholder Maize Farmers in Tanzania.” Kyoto University 12 (1): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• National Statics Office of Malawi. 2013. http://www.nsomalawi.mw/.
   Google Scholar
• Ricker-Gilbert, J., and T. S. Jayne. 2017. “Estimating the Enduring Effects of Fertiliser Subsidies on Commercial Fertiliser Demand and Maize Production: Panel Data Evidence from Malawi.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1): 70–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricker-Gilbert, J., T. S. Jayne, and E. Chirwa. 2011. “Subsidies and Crowding Out: A Double-Hurdle Model of Fertilizer Demand in Malawi.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93 (1): 26–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibande, L., A. Bailey, and S. Davidova. 2017. “The Impact of Farm Input Subsidies on Maize Marketing in Malawi.” Food Policy 69: 190–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchale, H. 2009. “The Efficiency of Smallholder Agriculture in Malawi.” African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economic 3 (2): 101–121.
   Google Scholar