Is development work still so straight? Heteronormativity in the development sector over a decade on

References

• 吴, 治, ed. 2013. 农村中小学青春期教育读本 [Rural Primary and Secondary School Adolescent Education Reader]. 北京 (Beijing): 科学普及出版社 (Popular Science Press).
   Google Scholar
• Adams, A., and E. Moyer. 2015. “Sex is Never the Same: Men’s Perspectives on Refusing Circumcision from an in-Depth Qualitative Study in Kwaluseni, Swaziland.” Global Public Health 10: 721–738.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman, D., and J. Symons. 2016. Queer Wars: The New Global Polarization Over Gay Rights. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aylward, E., and S. Brown. 2020. “Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Canada’s “Feminist” International Assistance.” International Journal 75: 313–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badgett, L. 2014. The Economic Cost of Homophobia. Washington DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bakare-Yusuf, B. 2013. “Thinking with Pleasure: Danger, Sexuality and Agency.” In Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure. S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, and K. Hawkins. London and New York: Zed Books: 28-41.
   Google Scholar
• Bandhu. 2021. Right Here Right Now 2: A new Movement on the Horizon. Dhaka: Bandhu Social Welfare Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, H. 2020a. “The Queer Global South: Transnational Video Activism Between China and Africa.” Global Media and China 5: 294–318.
   Google Scholar
• Bao, H. 2020b. “Queering International Development: The “Pleasure Principle” in the Participatory Video The Lucky One.” Feminist Media Studies 20: 530–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergenfield, R., and A. Miller. 2014. “Queering International Development? An Examination of New ‘LGBT Rights’ Rhetoric, Policy, and Programming among International Development Agencies.” LGBTQ Policy Journal, Harvard Kennedy School IV: 7–20.
   Google Scholar
• Berlant, L., and M. Warner. 1998. “Sex in Public.” Critical Inquiry 24: 547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosia, M. J. 2020. “Global Sexual Diversity Politics and the Trouble with LGBT Rights.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics, edited by M. J. Bosia, S. M. Mcevoy, and M. Rahman, 433–450. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boynton, P. 2013. “Challenging Clitoraid.” In Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure, edited by S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, and K. Hawkins, 229–250. London and New York: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• CEPAL. 2013. Montevideo Consensus on Population and Development. ECLAC document LC/L.3697. https://www.cepal.org/en/publications/21860-montevideo-consensus-population-and-development. Accessed 27 August 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. 2006. “Marginalisation by Sexuality: Report of an IDS Workshop.” Gender & Development 14: 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, J. V., E. C. Vargas, I. Finotelli, J. D. Fortenberry, E. Kismodi, A. Philpott, E. Rubio-Aurioles, and E. Coleman. 2019. “Why Pleasure Matters: Its Global Relevance for Sexual Health, Sexual Rights and Wellbeing.” International Journal of Sexual Health 31: 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevisser, M. 2020. The front line of the new gender wars. Financial Times, 27 June 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gosine, A. 2015. Rescue, and Real Love. Same-sex Desire in International Development. IDS Sexuality and Development Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Ilkkaracan, P., and S. Jolly. 2007. Gender and Sexuality Overview Report. In Cutting Edge Pack, Sussex: IDS. 1–45.
   Google Scholar
• IPPF. 2016. Putting Sexuality Back Into Comprehensive Sexuality Education: Making the Case for a Rights-Based, Sex-Positive Approach. London: International Planned Parenthood Foundation. https://www.ippf.org/sites/default/files/2016-10/Putting%20Sexuality%20back%20into%20Comprehensive%20Sexuality%20Education_0.pdf (Accessed 27 August 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S. 2007. “Why the Development Industry Should Get Over its Obsession with Bad Sex and Start to Think About Pleasure.” IDS Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S. 2011. “Why is Development Work so Straight? Heteronormativity in the International Development Industry.” Development in Practice 21: 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Jolly, S. 2016. “Positive Approaches to Sexuality and new Normative Frames: Strands of Research and Action in China and the USA.” Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning 16: 294–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., A. Cornwall, and K. Hawkins. 2013. Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure. London and New York: Zed Books
   Google Scholar
• Klapeer, C. M. 2018. “Dangerous Liaisons. (Homo) Developmentalism, Sexual Modernization and LGBTIQ Rights in Europe.” In Routledge Handbook of Queer Development Studies, edited by C. L. Mason, 102–118. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, S., K. Lustig, and K. Graling. 2013. “The Use and Misuse of Pleasure in Sex Education Curricula.” Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning 13: 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, S. 2015. “Emergent HIV Technology: Urban Tanzanian Women’s Narratives of Medical Research, Microbicides and Sexuality.” Culture Health & Sexuality 17: 412–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, C. L. 2018. Introduction to Routledge Handbook of Queer Development Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massad, J. 2002. “Re-orienting Desire: The Gay International and the Arab World.” Public Culture 14: 361–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. 2020. “Queering Development? The Unsettling Geographies of South-South Cooperation.” Antipode 52: 227–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepon, E. 2020. 2017/2018 Global Resources Report: Government and Philanthropic Support for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Intersex Communities. Paris: Global Philanthropy Project. https://globalresourcesreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/GRR_2017-2018_Color.pdf, accessed 27 August 2022
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhoff, P., L. Waldman, and D. Olerenshaw. 2014. Literature review on sexuality and poverty. Evidence Report. Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Otwoma, N. J., N. A. Opiyo, and C. Kojwang. 2009. “Saying No to Forced Early Retirement from Sex: Time to Broaden the Scope of HIV Prevention in Kenya.” Development 52: 105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Philpott, A.. 2021. "Stigma, Sex, and the Pleasure Revolution." In Everybody Hates Me: Let's Talk about Stigma podcast. https://www.buzzsprout.com/1024792/9177465, accessed 27 August 2022
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. 2015. “The Politics of LGBT Muslim Identities.” E-International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. 2020a. The “homocolonialist” Test for Global LGBTQ+ & SOGIE Rights Strategies. Accessed 2 February 2022. https://www.openglobalrights.org/the-homocolonialist-test-for-global-lgbtq-plus-and-sogie-rights-stragtegies/.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, M. 2020b. “What Makes LGBT Sexualities Political?” In The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics, edited by M. J. Bosia, S. M. McEvoy, and M. Rahman, 15–30. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, R. 2015. “Global Homocapitalism.” Radical Philosophy 194: 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, G. 1984. “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality.” In Pleasure and Danger, edited by C. Vance. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, J. 2009. “Reflections on the Construction of Heteronormativity.” Development 52: 52–55.
   Google Scholar
• Shrader, C. H., K. P. Jefferson, M. Kanamori, R. Rochat, and A. Siegler. 2021. ““I’d Rather Use a Refuse Bag:” A Qualitative Exploration of a South African Community’s Perceptions of Government-Provided Condoms and Participant-Preferred Solutions.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 50: 615–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V. A., and A. Philpott. 2019. Pleasure as a measure of agency and empowerment. MMS Bulletin, #151.
   Google Scholar
• SPW. 2021. Sexual Politics in Times of Pandemic. Rio de Janeiro: Sexuality Policy Watch.
   Google Scholar
• Starrs, A. M., A. C. Ezeh, G. Barker, A. Basu, J. T. Bertrand, R. Blum, A. M. Coll-Seck, et al. 2018. “Accelerate Progress-Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights for all: Report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission.” Lancet 391: 2642–2692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Touray, I. 2006. “Sexuality and Women’s Sexual Rights in the Gambia.” IDS Bulletin 37: 77–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Undie, C.-C. 2013. “Why We Need to Think About Sexuality and Sexual Well-Being: Addressing Sexual Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa.” In Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure, edited by S. Jolly, A. Cornwall, and K. Hawkins, 184–199. London and New York: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO, U., UNFPA, UNICEF, UNWOMEN, WHO. 2018. International Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education: An Evidence-Informed Approach. Paris: UNESCO, UNAIDS, UNFPA, UNICEF, UNWomen, WHO.
   Google Scholar
• UNFPA. 2014. Programme of Action adopted at the International Conference on Population and Development Cairo, 5–13 September 1994, 20th Anniversary Edition. United Nations Population Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Valle, F. S. 2020. “Turning Fear Into Pleasure: Feminist Resistance Against Online Violence in the Global South.” Feminist Media Studies. 21 (4): 621–638.
   Google Scholar
• Vance, C., ed. 1984. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• WAS. 2019. Declaration on Sexual Pleasure [Online]. World Association of Sexual Health. Accessed 10 May 2021. https://worldsexualhealth.net/resources/declaration-on-sexual-pleasure/.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R., J. Hirst, L. Wilson, and G. Burns-O’Connell. 2019. “The Pleasure Imperative? Reflecting on Sexual Pleasure’s Inclusion in Sex Education and Sexual Health.” Sex Education-Sexuality Society and Learning 19: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar