2,404
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Understanding and addressing the unintended effects of aid localisation

ORCID Icon &
Pages 351-363 | Received 15 Jun 2023, Accepted 02 Jan 2024, Published online: 25 Jan 2024

References

  • Baert, P. 1991. “Unintended Consequences: A Typology and Examples.” International Sociology 6 (2): 201–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858091006002006.
  • Bamberger, M., M. Tarsilla, and S. Hesse-Biber. 2016. “Why So Many “Rigorous” Evaluations Fail to Identify Unintended Consequences of Development Programs: How Mixed Methods Can Contribute.” Evaluation and Program Planning 55: 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001.
  • Barakat, S., and S. Milton. 2020. “Localisation Across the Humanitarian-Development-Peace Nexus.” Journal of Peacebuilding & Development 15 (2): 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620922805.
  • Barbelet, V., G. Davies, J. Flint, and E. Davey. 2021. Interrogating the Evidence Base on Humanitarian Localisation: A Literature Study. London: HAG. www.humanitarianadvisorygroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Localisation_lit_review_WEB-1.pdf
  • Barrett, C. B. 2006. Food Aid’s Intended and Unintended Consequences. Rome: FAO. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.289062.
  • Cordaid. 2021a. Combined Programmatic Capacities Countries, Organisational Capacity Assessments of Country Partners Just Future. The Hague: Cordaid. Internal Document.
  • Cordaid. 2021b. Combined Programmatic Capacities International, Organisational Capacity Assessments of Coalition Partners Just Future. The Hague: Cordaid. Internal Document.
  • Cordaid. 2021c. Feedback to Country Team by Thematic Experts on Annual Planning Niger for 2022. The Hague: Cordaid. Internal Document.
  • Cordaid. 2021d. Just Future in Afghanistan, Brainstorm by Country Partners for 2022 Planning. The Hague: Cordaid. Internal Document.
  • Cordaid. 2022. Evaluation des Ateliers de Cordaid sur le Genre. The Hague: Cordaid. Internal Document.
  • Cordaid, SFCG (Search for Common Ground), TLO (The Liaison Office), ASSN (African Security Sector Network), WANEP (West Africa Network for Peacebuilding), and WIPC (Women’s International Peace Centre). 2020. Full Narrative Proposal 2021–2025. The Hague: Just Future. www.africansecuritynetwork.org/assn/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Just-Future-Full-Narrative-ENG.pdf.
  • Davidson, A. A., M. D. Young, J. E. Leake, and P. O’Connor. 2022. “Aid and Forgetting the Enemy: A Systematic Review of the Unintended Consequences of International Development in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations.” Evaluation and Program Planning 92: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102099.
  • De Alteriis, M. 2020a. “Considering Unintended Consequences: Evidence from Recent Evaluations of U.S. Foreign Assistance Programs” American Journal of Evaluation 41 (1): 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018804081.
  • De Alteriis, M. 2020b. “What Can We Learn About Unintended Consequences From a Textual Analysis of Monitoring Reports and Evaluations for U.S.” Evaluation and Program Planning 79: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101779.
  • De Zwart, F. 2015. “Unintended but not Unanticipated Consequences.” Theory and Society 44: 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-015-9247-6.
  • DFID (Department for International Development). 2017. “DFID in the News.” GOV.UK. www.gov.uk/government/news/dfid-in-the-news.
  • Dijkstra, G. 2018. “Aid and Good Governance: Examining Aggregate Unintended Effects of Aid.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.004.
  • Erdilmen, M., and W. A. Sosthenes. 2020. Opportunities and Challenges for Localization of Humanitarian Action in Tanzania. Ottawa: Local Engagement Refugee Research Network. www.alnap.org/help-library/opportunities-and-challenges-for-localization-of-humanitarian-action-in-tanzania.
  • Goodwin, E., and A. Ager. 2021. “Localisation in the Context of UK Government Engagement with the Humanitarian Reform Agenda.” Frontiers in Political Science 3 (687063): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.687063.
  • Hageboeck, M., M. Frumkin, and S. Monschein. 2013. Meta-Evaluation of Quality and Coverage of USAID Evaluations. Washington, DC: USAID. www.usaid.gov/evaluation/meta-evaluation-quality-and-coverage
  • Howe, K., and E. Stites. 2019. “Partners Under Pressure: Humanitarian Action for the Syria Crisis.” Disasters 43 (1): 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12298.
  • Huang, M. 2022. “The Localization of International Anti-Pandemic Aid Through Decentralized NGOs: The Example of Nanjing’s Aid to the International Cities of Peace in Africa During the COVID-19 Pandemics.” In Peace Studies for Sustainable Development in Africa, edited by E. Spiegel, G. Mutalemwa, C. Liu, and L. R. Kurtz, 355–361. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Ilkkaracan, P. 2015. “Commentary: Sexual Health and Human Rights in the Middle East and North Africa: Progress or Backlash?” Global Public Health 10 (2): 268–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.986173.
  • Jabeen, S. 2018. “Unintended Outcomes Evaluation Approach: A Plausible Way to Evaluate Unintended Outcomes of Social Development Programmes.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.005.
  • Keijzer, N., and E. Lundsgaarde. 2018. “When ‘Unintended Effects’ Reveal Hidden Intentions: Implications of ‘Mutual Benefit’ Discourses for Evaluating Development Cooperation.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.003.
  • Kloss, S. T. 2017. “The Global South as Subversive Practice: Challenges and Potentials of a Heuristic Concept.” The Global South 11 (2): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2979/globalsouth.11.2.01.
  • Koch, D. J. 2024. Foreign Aid and its Unintended Consequences. Abingdon: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/The-Unintended-Effects-of-Aid-and-Development/Koch/p/book/9781032412146
  • Koch, D. J., and L. Schulpen. 2018. “Introduction to the Special Issue ‘Unintended Effects of International Cooperation’.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.006.
  • Koch, D. J., J. Vis, M. van der Harst, E. Tendron, and J. de Laat. 2021. “Assessing International Development Cooperation: Becoming Intentional About Unintended Effects.” Sustainability 13 (21): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111571.
  • Leenstra, M. 2018. “The Human Factor in Development Cooperation: An Effective Way to Deal with Unintended Effects.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.008.
  • Lemon, A., and M. Pinet. 2018. “Measuring Unintended Effects in Peacebuilding: What the Field of International Cooperation Can Learn from Innovative Approaches Shaped by Complex Contexts.” Evaluation and Program Planning 68: 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.007.
  • Manis, A. 2018. Cost-Effectiveness in Humanitarian Aid: Localisation Programming. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies. www.gsdrc.org/publications/cost-effectiveness-in-humanitarian-aid-localisation-programming/.
  • Merton, R. K. 1936. “The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action.” American Sociological Review 1 (6): 894–904. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084615.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2005. Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264098084-en.
  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2008. Accra Agenda for Action. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264098107-en.
  • Robillard, S., T. Atim, and D. Maxwell. 2021. Localization: A Landscape Report. Boston: Feinstein International Center, Tufts University. www.humanitarianlibrary.org/resource/localization-landscape-report.
  • Roepstorff, K. 2020. “A Call for Critical Reflection on the Localisation Agenda in Humanitarian Action.” Third World Quarterly 41 (2): 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1644160.
  • Roepstorff, K. 2022. “Localisation Requires Trust: An Interface Perspective on the Rohingya Response in Bangladesh.” Disasters 46 (3): 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12483.
  • Sekhon, J. S. 2004. “Quality Meets Quantity: Case Studies, Conditional Probability, and Counterfactuals.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (2): 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040150.
  • Sundberg, M. 2019. “National Staff in Public Foreign Aid: Aid Localization in Practice.” Human Organization 78 (3): 253–263. https://doi.org/10.17730/0018-7259.78.3.253.
  • Vij, M. 2023. “In Focus: Enablers of Locally Led Development.” In Development Co-Operation Report 2023: Debating the Aid System, edited by S. Sachs, 172–180. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f6edc3c2-en.
  • Wiig, H., and H. Holm. 2014. Unintended Effects in Evaluations of Norwegian Aid: A Desk Study. Oslo: NORAD. www.norad.no/globalassets/import-2162015-80434-am/www.norad.no-ny/filarkiv/vedlegg-til-publikasjoner/unintended-effects-in-evaluations-of-norwegian-aid.pdf.
  • Wong, S., and S. Guggenheim. 2018. Community-Driven Development: Myths and Realities. Washington, DC: World Bank. www.ssrn.com/abstract=3176323.