Conspicuous practice: self-surveillance and commodification in English education

References

• Aldridge, A. (2003). Consumption. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2004). Education for sale! The commodification of everything? The annual education lecture, June. London: Kings College.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the self, resistance and subjectivity under neoliberal governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54, 85–96.10.1080/17508487.2013.740678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 408–437.10.2307/2393374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J., Chandler, J., & Clark, H. (2001). Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2004). Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z., & Lyon, D. (2013). Liquid surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bleakley, A. (1999). From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 315–330.10.1080/03075079912331379925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, C. (1995). Work, self and society after industrialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. (1999). Professional education, reflective practice and feminism. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 3, 167–179.10.1080/136031199285101
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, D. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10, 527–547.10.1177/13505084030103010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crozier, G. (1999). Parental involvement: Who wants it? International Studies in Sociology of Education, 9, 219–238.10.1080/09620219900200045
   Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Bansel, P. (2007). Neoliberalism and education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 247–259.10.1080/09518390701281751
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, P., & Sewell, G. (2002). Looking for the good soldier, Švejk. Sociology, 36, 857–873.10.1177/003803850203600404
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish – The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Y., & Lang, T. (2006). The unmanageable consumer. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Haggerty, K., & Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51, 605–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassrick, E. M., & Schneider, B. (2009). Parent surveillance in schools: A question of social class. American Journal of Education, 115, 195–225.10.1086/595665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, I., & Hudson, M. (2003). Removing the veil? Commodity fetishism, fair trade, and the environment. Organization & Environment, 16, 413–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, A. (2004). Risk anxiety, policy, and the spectre of sexual abuse in early childhood Education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25, 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kroener, I., & Neyland, D. (2014). New technologies, security and surveillance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 141–148). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, R., & Carter, P. (2011). Neoliberalism and education: An introduction. Educational Studies, 47, 107–110.10.1080/00131946.2011.556387
   Google Scholar
• Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34–47.10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A., & Cook, P. S. (2014). The conditions of exposure and immediacy: Internet surveillance and Generation Y. Journal of Sociology, Online First. Retrieved Janauary 14, 2015. doi:10.1177/1440783314522870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V., & Ready, D. (2007). Schools within schools: Possibilities and pitfalls of high school reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lepowska, D. (2014). A poor Ofsted report could lead to headteachers being ‘disappeared’. The Guardian. Retrieved May 6, 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/mar/11/heads-poor-ofsted-report-dismissal-shortages
   Google Scholar
• Locke, J. L. (2010). Eavesdropping: An intimate history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2003). Surveillance as social sorting. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Surveillance as social sorting: Privacy, risk and digital discrimination (pp. 13–30). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2006). The search for surveillance theories. In D. Lyon (Ed.), Theorizing surveillance (pp. 3–20). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, D. (2010). Liquid surveillance: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to surveillance studies1. International Political Sociology, 4, 325–338.10.1111/ips.2010.4.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, D., Haggerty, K., & Ball, K. (2014). Introducing surveillance studies. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 1–11). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maki, K. (2011). Neoliberal deviants and surveillance: Welfare recipients under the watchful eye of Ontario works. Surveillance and Society, 9, 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1, 215–234.10.1177/1362480697001002003
   Google Scholar
• McCraken, G. (1990). Culture and consumption. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2014a). Managing serious teacher misbehaviour. School Leadership and Management, 34, 269–283.10.1080/13632434.2013.849682
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2014b). Desirable organisational masculinities: Competition and entrepreneurialism in schools of construction in further education colleges. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 895–913.10.1080/01425692.2013.800445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2015). The visibility and invisibility of performance management in schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41, 1031–1049.10.1002/berj.3185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2016a). Conceptualising the surveillance of teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, ( Online First). Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01425692.2016.1218752?journalCode=cbse20
   Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2016b). The multiple impacts of teacher misbehaviour. Journal of Educational Administration, 54, 2–18.10.1108/JEA-09-2014-0106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, D. (2017). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teaching. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1–13.10.1080/02680939.2016.1209566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piper, H., & Smith, H. (2003). ‘Touch’ in educational and child care settings: Dilemmas and responses. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 879–894.10.1080/0141192032000137358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. (1998). Everyday struggles at the workplace: The nature and implications of routine resistance in contemporary organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 15, 225–257.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, J. (2007). Social control and modern social structure. In S. Hier & J. Greenberg (Eds.), The surveillance studies reader (pp. 19–27). Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford, J. (1990). A place called home: Identity and the cultural politics of difference. In J. Rutherford (Ed.), Identity: Community, culture, difference (pp. 13–29). London: Lawrence and Wishart.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs, J. (2004). Watching yourself and others: Touch, personal space and risk of harm in the classroom. Paper presented at the AARE Annual Conference, Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Shakeshaft, C. (2013). Know the warning signs of educator sexual misconduct. Phi Delta Kappan, 94, 8–13.10.1177/003172171309400503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, V. (2001). Impression management, commitment and gender. European Management Journal, 19, 183–194.10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00093-1
   Google Scholar
• Singlehurst, D., Russell, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2008). Peer observation of teaching in the online environment: An action research approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 383–393.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. J. D. (2014). Surveillance work(ers). In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies (pp. 107–116). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (1994). The theory of the leisure class. New York, NY: Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. (1986). Speed and politics. New York, NY: Semiotext.
   Google Scholar