Researching in times of pandemic and social unrest: a flexible mindset for an enriched view on literacy

References

• Atkins, L., & Duckworth, V. (2019). Research methods for social justice and equity in education. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila Reyes, N., Navarro, F., & Tapia-Ladino, M. (2020). Identidad, voz y agencia: claves para una enseñanza inclusiva de la escritura en la universidad [Identity, voice, and agency: Key concepts for an inclusive teaching of writing in the university]. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 98, 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4722
   Google Scholar
• Ávila, Reyes, N., Navarro, F., & Tapia-Ladino, M. (2021). ‘My Abilities Were Pretty Mediocre’: Challenging Deficit Discourses in Expanding Higher Education Systems. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Ávila Reyes, N., Figueroa, J., Calle-Arango, L., & Morales, S. (2021). Experiencias con la escritura académica: Un estudio longitudinal con estudiantes diversos. [Academic writing experiences: a longitudinal study with diverse students]. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (2005). Literacy practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton & R. Ivanić (Eds.) Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American Lives. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, D. (2011). Literacy as involvement: The acts of writers, readers, and texts. Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiroleu, A., & Marquina, M. (2017). Democratisation or credentialism? Public policies of expansion of higher education in Latin America. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 1(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2017.1303787
   Google Scholar
• Dippre, R. (2016). Sponsorshaping: How a teacher used sponsors of literacy for pedagogical purposes. Networks an Online Journal for Teacher Research, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4148/2470-6353.1024
   Google Scholar
• Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eodice, M., Geller, A., & Lerner, N. (2016). The meaningful writing project. Learning, teaching and writing in higher education.Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, J. (2012). Longitudinal writing research in (and for) the twenty-first century. In L. Nickoson & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Writing studies research in practice (pp. 171–184). Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gere, A. R. (2010). Kitchen tables and rented rooms: The extracurriculum of composition. In T. Deans, B. Roswell, & A. J. Wurr (Eds.), Writing and community engagement (pp. 34–49). Bedford/St. Martin’s.
   Google Scholar
• Girvan, C., & Savage, T. (2013). Guidelines for conducting text based interviews in virtual worlds. In M. Childs & A. Peachey, (Eds.), Understanding learning in virtual worlds (pp. 21–39). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5370-2_2
   Google Scholar
• Goggin, M. D., & Goggin, P. N. (2018). Stumbling into wisdom in rhetoric, writing and literacy research: An introduction. In M.D. Goggin & P. N. Goggin (Eds.), Serendipity in rhetoric, writing and literacy research (pp. 3–16). Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, E. (2007). Because we live here: Sponsoring literacy beyond the curriculum. Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐López, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity,6(4), 286–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039909524733
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M. (In press). Academic Literacies: ¿intereses locales, preocupaciones globales? Academic Literacies: Local interests, global concerns? In Á. Reyes, N. (Ed.), Multilingual contributions to writing research: Towards an equal academic exchange. The WAC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M. (2001). Student writing: Access, regulation, desire. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “Deep Theorizing”: Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25(3), 353–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088308319229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillis, T. M., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: Issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v4i1.5
   Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, S., & Goldblatt, E. (2000). Writing beyond the curriculum: Fostering new collaborations in literacy. College English, 62(5), 584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/378963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piano, D. (2018). Making sense of disaster. In M. D. Goggin & P. N. Goggin (Eds.), Serendipity in rhetoric, writing and literacy research (pp. 28–43). Utah State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Santelices, M. V., Horn, C., & Catalán, X. (2019). Institution-level admissions initiatives in Chile: Enhancing equity in higher education? Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 733–761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1398722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, K., & Hull, G. (2008). Literacies in and out of school in the United States. In N. H. Hornberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and education, (Vol. 2, Issue 1983, pp. 646–657). Springer US. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30424-3_48.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R. (2012). Towards a clearer understanding of student disadvantage in higher education: Problematising deficit thinking. Higher Education Research and Development, 31(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.634383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. V. (2005). At last: Recent applications of new literacy studies in educational contexts. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(4), 417–423. Retrieved May 10, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40171646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. (2017) . Desiguales. Orígenes, cambios y desafíos de la brecha social en Chile [Unequal. origins, changes and challenges in Chile’s social divide.].
   Google Scholar
• Villalobos Dintrans, P., Castillo, C., De La Fuente, F., & Maddaleno, M. (2020). COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the Metropolitan Region, Chile: Time, space, and structural factors. MedRxiv, 2020(9), 15.20194951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.15.20194951
   Google Scholar
• Zavala, V. (2019). Justicia sociolingüística para los tiempos de hoy [Sociolinguistic justice for our times]. Íkala, 24(2), 343–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v24n02a09
   Google Scholar