310
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Lost in deliberative deficit: the dilemma and learning curve of defending the university campus in the Hong Kong 2019 protest

&
Pages 379-408 | Received 12 Feb 2021, Accepted 11 Jan 2022, Published online: 02 Feb 2022

References

  • Parkinson, J., & Mansbridge, J. (Eds.). (2012). Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hatcher, J. A., Bringle, R. G., & Hahn, T. W. (Eds.). (2016). Research on student civic outcomes in service learning: Conceptual frameworks and methods (Vol. 3). Stylus Publishing, LLC.
  • Aramburuzabala, P., Mcllrath, L., & Opazo, H. (Eds.). (2019). Embedding service learning in European Higher Education: Development a culture of civic engagement. Routledge.
  • Agnew, J. (1987). Place and politics: The geographical mediation of state and society. Allen & Unwin.
  • Alase, A. (2017). The interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA): A guide to a good qualitative research approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9.
  • Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bernstein, J. L. (2008). Cultivating civic competence: Simulations and skill-building in an introductory government class. Journal of Political Science Education, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160701815996
  • Biddix, J. P., Somers, P. A., & Polman, J. L. (2009). Protest reconsidered: Identifying democratic and civic engagement learning outcomes. Innovative Higher Education, 34(3), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-009-9101-8
  • Biddix, J. P. (2014). Development through dissent: Campus activism as civic learning. New Directions for Higher Education, (2014(167), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20106
  • Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity and democracy. MIT Press.
  • Chan, S. C. K. (2020). A Hong Kong critique of identity: Belonging and becoming in the aberrant post-colony. Situations, 13(2), 169–197 http://situations.yonsei.ac.kr/product/data/item/1601379784/detail/ced07649ac.pdf.
  • Cai, Y. (2019). Protesters and tactical escalation. In N. Ma & E. Cheng (Eds.), The umbrella movement: Civil resistance and contentious space (pp. 209–232). Amsterdam University Press.
  • Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and liberal democracy. Oxford University Press.
  • Centre for Communication and Public Opinion Survey (2020). Research report on public opinion during the anti-extradition bill (fugitive offenders bill) movement in Hong Kong. http://www.com.cuhk.edu.hk/ccpos/en/pdf/202005PublicOpinionSurveyReport-ENG.pdf
  • Chambers, S. (2015). An ethics of public political deliberation. In Celikates, R., Kreide R., & Wesche, T. (Eds.), Transformations of Democracy: Crisis, Protest and Legitimation (pp. 127–146). Rowman & Littlefield International.
  • Chan, M. (2016). Social network sites and political engagement: Exploring the impact of facebook connections and uses on political protest and participation. Mass Communication and Society, 19(4), 430–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1161803
  • Chan, R., Mak, W., Chan, W., & Lin, W. (2021). Effects of social movement participation on political efficacy and well-being: A longitudinal study of civically engaged youth. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 1981–2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-020-00303-y
  • Chen, Y., & Szeto, M. (2015). The forgotten road of progressive localism: New reservation movement in Hong Kong. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies: Hong Kong at a Crossroads, 16(3), 436–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2015.1071694
  • Cheng, E. W., Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., & Tang, G. (forthcoming). Total mobilization from below: Abeyance networks, threats, and emotions in Hong Kong’s freedom summer. The China Quarterly. https://preprints.apsanet.org/engage/apsa/article-details/5f6e0f88c2b6b3001964d1b9
  • Chick, D. M. (2020). Acts Of Civility: Implicit arguments for the role of civility and the paradox of confrontation. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 10(1), 37–53 http://contemporaryrhetoric.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Chick_10_1_2_3.pdf.
  • Chung, H. F. (2020). Changing repertoires of contention in Hong Kong: A case study on the anti-extradition bill movement. China Perspectives, 2000(3), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.10476
  • Cowan, J. (2006). On Becoming an innovative university teacher: Reflection in action. McGraw-Hill Education.
  • Cresswell, T. (2015). Place: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
  • Daphi, P. (2017). “Imagine the streets”: The spatial dimension of protests’ transformative effects and its role in building movement identity. Political Geography, 56, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.10.003
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press.
  • Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
  • Elder, L., Seligsohn, A., & Hofrenning, D. (2007). Experiencing new hampshire: The effects of an experiential learning course on civic engagement. Journal of Political Science Education, 3(2), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160701338379
  • Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(5), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270600670775
  • Feldman, L., Pasek, J., Romer, D., & Jamieson, H. (2007). Identifying best practices in civic education: Lessons from the student voices program. American Journal of Education, 114(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1086/520692
  • Finley, A. (2011). Civic learning and democratic engagements: A review of literature on civic engagement in post-secondary education. AAC&U. www.aacu.org/civic_learning/crucible/documents/LiteratureReview.pdf
  • Fishkin, J. S., & Laslett, P. (2003). Debating deliberative democracy. Chichester. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
  • Fishkin, J. S. (2009). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy & public consultation. Oxford University Press.
  • Fitzpatrick, T. (2009). Deliberative democracy, critical rationality and social memory: Theoretical resources of an ‘education for discourse’. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 28(4), 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9121-3
  • Foley, G. (1999). Learning in social action: A contribution to understanding informal education. Global perspectives on adult education and training. Zed.
  • Fraser-Burgess, S. (2012). Groupidentity, deliberative democracy and diversity in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 44(5), 480–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00717.x
  • Giroux, H. A. (2012). Higher education under siege: Rethinking the politics of critical pedagogy. Counterpoints, 422, 327–341 https://www.jstor.org/stable/42981765?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
  • Gleason, B. (2013). Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on twitter: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479372
  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Belknap Press.
  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton University Press.
  • Hall, B. L. (2012). ‘A giant human hashtag’: Learning and the #occupy movement. In B. L. Hall, D. E. Clover, J. Crowther, & E. Scandrett (Eds.), Learning and education for a better world: The role of social movements (pp. 125–139). Sense.
  • Harrison, L. M., & Mather, P. C. (2017). Making meaning of student activism: Student activist and administrator perspectives. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 29(2), 117–135. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1150474.
  • He, M. (2019). Challenging Beijing’s mandate of heaven: Taiwan’s sunflower movement and Hong Kong’s umbrella movement. Temple.
  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2000). Kolb’s experiential learning theory and its application in geography in higher education. Journal of Geography, 99(5), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340008978967
  • Hindess, B. (2000). Representation ingrafted upon democracy. Democratization, 7(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340008403657
  • Ho, M. S. (2020). How protests evolve: Hong Kong’s anti-extradition movement and lessons learned from the umbrella movement. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 25(SI), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-25-5-711
  • Hopkins, P., & Todd, L. (2015). Creating an intentionally dialogic space: Student activism and the Newcastle occupation 2010. Political Geography, 46, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.10.008
  • Hui, M. (2019, November 12). Photos: Hong Kong police and students are fighting a war in one of the city’s top universities. Quartz. https://qz.com/1746924/police-students-battle-in-chinese-university-of-hong-kong/
  • Kahne, J., & Sporte, S. (2008). Developing citizens: The impact of civic learning opportunities on students’ commitment to civic participation. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 738–766. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316951
  • Kim, J. (2016). The nature of adult learning in social movements. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning, 25, 29–50 https://www.iup.edu/pse/files/programs/graduate_programs_r/instructional_design_and_technology_ma/paace_journal_of_lifelong_learning/volume_25,_2016/kim-2.pdf.
  • Knight Abowitz, K. 2013. Publics for public school: Legitimacy, democracy, and leadership (with S. R. Thompson). Paradigm.
  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  • Kow, Y. M., Nardi, B., & Cheng, W. K. (2020). Be water: Technologies in the leaderless anti-elab movement in Hong Kong. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376634
  • Ku, A. (2007). Constructing and contesting the ‘order’ imagery in media discourse: Implications for civil society in Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Communication, 17(2), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980701306613
  • Ku, A. (2020). New forms of youth activism - Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill movement in the local-national-global nexus. Space & Polity, 24(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562576.2020.1732201
  • Kwong, Y. (2016). The growth of ‘localism’ in Hong Kong. China Perspectives, 3(3), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.7057
  • Lai, Y., & Sing, M. (2020). Solidarity and implications of a leaderless movement in Hong Kong: Its strengths and limitations. Communist and Post-communist Studies, 53(4), 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.41
  • Lam-Knott, S. (2017). Understanding protest ‘violence’ in Hong Kong from the youth perspective. Asian Anthropology, 16(4), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2017.1374622
  • Law, W. S. (2019). The spectrum of frames and disputes in the umbrella movement. In C. L. Lee & M. Sing (Eds.), Take back our future: An eventful sociology of the Hong Kong umbrella movement (pp. 74–99). Cornell University Press.
  • Lee, A. Y. L., & Ting, K. W. (2015). Media and information praxis of young activists in the umbrella movement. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 376–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2015.1086399
  • Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. (2011). Media, social mobilization and mass protests in post-colonial Hong Kong. Routledge.
  • Lee, F. L. F., Cheng, E., Liang, H., Tang, G. K. Y., & Yuen, S. (2021b). Dynamics of tactical radicalisation and public receptiveness in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill movement. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 2021 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00472336.2021.1910330.
  • Lee, F. L. F., Tang, G. K. Y., Yuen, S., & Cheng, E. (2020). Five demands and (not quite) beyond: Claim making and ideology in Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill movement. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 53(4), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1525/j.postcomstud.2020.53.4.22
  • Lee, F. L. F., Yuen, S., Tang, G. K. Y., & Cheng, E. (2019). Hong Kong’s summer of uprising: From anti-extradition to anti-authoritarian protests. China Review, 19(4), 1–32 https://www.jstor.org/stable/26838911.
  • Lee, F. L. F. (2020). Solidarity in the anti-extradition bill movement in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 52(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629
  • Lee, F. L. F, Liang, H., Cheng, E., Tang, G., & Yuen, S. (2021a). Affordances, movement dynamics, and a centralized digital communication platform in a networked movement. In Information, Communication & Society (pp. 1–18). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1877772?journalCode=rics20
  • Lee, P. S. N., So, C. Y. K., & Leung, L. (2015). Social media and umbrella movement: Insurgent public sphere in formation. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 356–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2015.1088874
  • Leung, C-H. (2016). Cultivating political morality for deliberative citizens—Rawls and Callan revisited. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1426–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1138393
  • Levinson, M. (2003). Challenging deliberation. Theory and Research in Education, 1(1), 23–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878503001001003
  • Levinson, M. (2012). No citizen left behind (pp. 60–98). Harvard University Press.
  • Li, Y., & Whitworth, K. (2021). Reclaiming Hong Kong through neighbourhood-making: A study of the 2019 Anti-ELAB movement. Urban Studies, 004209802110144. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980211014448
  • Liang, H., & Lee, F. L. F. (2021a). Opinion leadership in a leaderless movement: Discussion of the anti-extradition bill movement in the ‘LIHKG’ web forum. Social Movement Studies, 2021, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2021.1989294
  • Liang, H., & Lee, F. L. F. (2021b). Thread popularity inequality as an indicator of organizationthrough communication in a networked movement: An analysis of the LIHKG forum. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1–23. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17544750.2021.1922475
  • Ma, N. (2019). From political acquiescence to civil disobedience: Hong Kong’s road to occupation. In N. Ma & E. Cheng (Eds.), The umbrella movement: Civil resistance and contentious space (pp. 27–50). Amsterdam University Press.
  • Ma, N. (2020). The resistant community: The 2019 Hong Kong’s anti-extradition bill movement. Rive Gauche Publishing House. [ In Chinese].
  • Macgillivray, I. K. (2005). Shaping democratic identities and building citizenship skill through student activisim: Mexcio’s first gay-straight alliance. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(4), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500299783
  • Mariani, M. D. (2007). Connecting students to politics through a multi-class campaign simulation. PS, Political Science & Politics, 40(4), 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507071247
  • Mok, H. C. (2020, January). “The siege of CUHK: From beginning to end.” Chinese University Student Press. [In Chinese] http://cusp.hk/?p=8568
  • Niesz, T., Korora, A., Walkuski, C., & Foot, R. (2018). Social movements and educational research: Toward a united field of scholarship. Teachers College Record, 120(3), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811812000305
  • Polletta, F. (1999). ‘Free spaces’ in collective action. Theory and Society, 28(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006941408302
  • Sanders, L. (1997). Against deliberation. Political Theory, 25(3), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591797025003002
  • Sandlin, J., & Walther, C. (2009). Complicated simplicity. Adult Education Quarterly, 59(4), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713609334137
  • Saunders, C. (2008). Double-edged swords? Collective identity and solidarity in the environment movement. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00191.x
  • Sennett, R. (1998). The corrosion of character: The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism (1st ed.). Norton.
  • Shaw, C. M. (2006). Simulating negotiations in a three-way civil war. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512160500484150
  • Shek, D. T. L., Ngai, G., & Chan, S. C. F. C. (2019). Service-learning for youth leadership: The case of Hong Kong. Springer.
  • Smith, J., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis : Theory, method and research. London; Los Angeles: London.
  • Ting, T. Y. (2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: Nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736
  • Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school’s eole in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_7
  • Wong, J., & So, A. (2020). The re-making of developmental citizenship in post-handover Hong Kong. Citizenship Studies, 24(7), 934–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1812958
  • Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the order: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political. Princeton University Press.
  • Young, I. M. (2001). Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 670–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005004
  • Yuen, S. (2018). Contesting middle-class civility: Place-based collective identity in Hong Kong’s occupy mongkok. Social Movement Studies, 17(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1434501
  • Zhu, A. Y. F., Chan, A. L. S., & Chou, K. L. (2021). Psychological transformation of youth after engaging in non-radical and radical political activities. Current psychology https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01239-5.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.