78
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Enhanced supervision or surveillance? The use of CCTV in approved premises

Pages 18-19 | Published online: 13 Mar 2008

References

  • Bridges , A. 2007 . “ ‘Not Locked up but Subject to Rules’ ” . In An inquiry into managing offenders in Approved Premises (hostels) following the Panorama programme broadcast on 8 November 2006 , London : HMIP .
  • Cherry , S. and Cheston , L. 2006 . ‘Towards a model regime for Approved Premises’ . Probation Journal , 53 ( 3 ) : 248 – 264 .
  • Foster , S. 2004 . “ ‘Approved Premises: Results of a snapshot survey 2003’ ” . In Research, Development & Statistics Directorate , London : Home Office . (Findings 230)
  • Garland , D. 2000 . ‘The Culture of High Crime Societies. Some Preconditions of Recent ‘Law and Order’ Policies’ . British Journal of Criminology , 40 : 347 – 375 .
  • Hudson , B. 2001 . ‘Human Rights, Public Safety and the Probation Service: Defending Justice in the Risk Society’ . The Howard Journal , 40 ( 2 ) : 103 – 13 .
  • National Probation Service . 2005 . ‘The Role and Purpose of Approved Premises. Probation Circular 37/2005’ , London : National Probation Directorate .
  • Norris , C. 1999 . Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise ofCCT , Oxford : Berg Publishers .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.