Physico-chemical characteristics, nutrient composition and consumer acceptability of wheat varieties grown under organic and inorganic farming conditions

References

• AACC. 1984. Approved methods of analysis. St Paul, MN: The American Association of Cereal Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Anjum, Walker CE. 2000. Grain, flour and bread making properties of eight Pakistani hard white spring wheat cultivars grown at three different locations for 2 years. Int J Food Sci Technol 35:407–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1995. Official methods of analysis. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Baade E. Einstellungen and verhaltensweisen beir Ver-brauchern von ‘Bio’-Produkten. AID-Verbraucherdients 1985; 30: 245–253
   Google Scholar
• Bakshi AK, Bains GS. Study of physico-chemical, rheological, baking and noodle quality of improved durum and bread wheat cultivars. J Food Sci Technol 1987; 24: 217–221
   Google Scholar
• Belderok B. Assay methods and instrumentation in development in bread making processes. Plant Foods Human Nutr 2000; 55: 67–87
   Google Scholar
• Bundesministerium fur jugend. 1985. Was erwartet der Verbraucher von Biolebensmittelin? Ergebnisse einer Reprasentativbefragune. Verbraucherschutz-Report. Bundesministerium fur jugend, Familie und Gesundheit. Belin, Germany pp 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Cerning J, Guilbot J. Changes in carbohydrate composition during maturation of wheat and barley kernel. Cereal Chem 1973; 50: 220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CH, Bushuk W. Nature of proteins in triticale and its parental species. I. Solubility characteristic and amino acid composition of endosperm proteins. Can J Plant Sci 1970; 50: 9–14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen PS, Tosibara TY, Warner H. Micro-determination of phosphorus. Anal Chem 1956; 28: 1756–1759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra SL, Kanwar JS. Analytical agricultural chemistry. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi 1976
   Google Scholar
• Clegg KM. The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. J Sci Food Agric 1956; 7: 40
   Google Scholar
• Davies NT, Reid H. An evaluation of phytate, zinc, copper, iron and magnesium content and availability from soya-based textured vegetables. Br J Nutr 1979; 41: 579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhingra S. 2001. Physico-chemical, functional and nutritional properties of cereal pulse blends in bread making quality. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Folkers D. Biologischer Anbau von Obst und gemuse Die Einstellung der Buindersburger. Ernaehr Umsch 1983; 30B: 36
   Google Scholar
• Gopalan C, Ramasastri BV, Balasubramanian SC. 2000. Nutritive value of Indian foods. Hyderabad: NIN, ICMR.
   Google Scholar
• Haglund A, Johansson L, Dahlstedt L. Sensory evaluation of whole meal bread from ecologically and conventionally grown wheat. J Cereal Sci 1998; 27(2)199–207
   Google Scholar
• Hira CK, Kochhar A, Kaur B, Sharma SK. Protein, lysine, mineral and phenol contents of some Indian wheat varieties. J Food Sci Technol 1991; 28: 112–113
   Google Scholar
• Hooda S. 2002. Nutritional evaluation of fenugreek supplemented wheat products. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Jood S. 1990. Studies on nutritional quality of wheat, maize and sorghum as affected by infestation of Trichoderma granarium and Rhizopertha dominica. PhD thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Jood S, Kapoor A. C. Effect of storage and insect infestation on protein and starch digestibility of cereal grains. Food Chem 1992; 44: 209–219
   Google Scholar
• Knuckles BE, Kuzmicky DD, Betschart AA. Effects of phytates and partially hydrolysed phytates on in vitro protein digestibility. J Food Sci 1985; 50: 1080–1082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsey WL, Norwell MA. A new DPTA-TEA soil test for zinc and iron. Agron Abstr 1969; 61: 84
   Google Scholar
• Lolas GM, Palamidis N, Maikalis P. The phytic acid total phosphorus relationship in barley, oats, soybean and wheat. Cereal Chem 1976; 53: 867–871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller BS, Afework S, Pomeranz Y, Briunsma B, Booth GD. Measuring the hardness of wheat. Cereal Foods World 1982; 27: 61–64
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naik MS. Lysine and tryptophan in protein fractions of Sorghum Indian J Genetics 1968; 28: 142–146
   Google Scholar
• Nitika 2005. Nutritional evaluation of wheat varieties grown under organic and inorganic conditions. M.Sc. Thesis submitted to CCS Haryan Agriculture University, Hisar, India.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne TB. 1907. The protein of wheat ternel. Institution of Washington Pub. No. 84.
   Google Scholar
• Panse YG, Sukhatme PV. Statistical methods for agricultural workers2nd ed. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi 1961; 12–87
   Google Scholar
• Peterson WH, Skinner JT, Strong FM. 1943. Elements of food biochemistry. New York: Prentice Hall p 73.
   Google Scholar
• Quin JR, Paton D. 1983. A pratical measurement of water hydration capacity of protein materials. Cereal Chem 56: 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Sangwan V. 2002. Development of nutritional evaluation of wheat, sorghum, soybean, composite flour biscuits. PhD thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrawat S. 2000. Comparison of processing attributes of wheat produced under organic and conventional farming systems. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma K. 2000. Rheological and baking characteristics of some wheat varieties grown in Haryana. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Bajwa U, Negi HPS. Rheological and baking properties of cowpea and wheat flour blends. J Food Sci Technol 1999; 79: 657–662
   Google Scholar
• Sharma VK. Organic farming as an alternative agriculture in India problems and prospects. Indian Farm 2001; 51(3)23–25
   Google Scholar
• Singh G, Paliwal SC. Physico-chemical, milling and bread making quality of the varieties of durum wheats. Bull Grain Technol 1986; 24: 73–76
   Google Scholar
• Singh S. 2004. Evaluation of wheat varieties and development of high fibre biscuits. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Singh U, Jambunathan R. Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum) cultivars. Level of protease inhibitors, levels of polyphenolic compounds and in vitro protein digestibility. J Food Sci 1981; 46: 1364–1367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh U, Kherdekar MS, Jambunathan R. Studies on desi and kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) cultivars. V. The levels of amylase inhibitors, oligosaccharides and in vitro starch digestibility. J Food Sci 1982; 47: 510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somogyi M. A new reagent for the determination of sugar. J Biol Chem 1945; 160: 61–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starling W, Richards MC. Quality of commercial samples of organically grown wheat. Aspects Appl Biol 1993; 36: 205–209
   Google Scholar
• Swain J, Hills WE. The phenolic constituents of prunus domestica. The qualitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J Sci Food Agric 1959; 10: 63
   Google Scholar
• Varsha. 2003. Nutritional evaluation and utilization of selected cereals and pulses for value addition of wheat based products. MSc thesis, CCSHAU, HisarIndia.
   Google Scholar
• Williams PC, Nakaul H, Singh KB. Relationship between cooking time and some physical characteristics in chickpea. J Sci Food Agric 1983; 34: 492–496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woese K, Drik L, Boess C, Bogl Warner K. A comparison of organically and conventionally grown foods. J Sci Food Agric 1997; 74: 281–293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yemm EW, Willis AJ. The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem J 1954; 57: 508–514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar