References
- Antonuk B, Block LG. 2006. The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food. J Nutr Educ Behav. 38(6):365–370.
- Brener ND, Billy JO, Grady WR. 2003. Assessment of factors affecting the validity of self-reported health-risk behavior among adolescents: evidence from the scientific literature. J Adolesc Health. 33(6):436–457.
- Brown A. 2013. In U.S., Less Than Half Look At Restaurant Nutrition Facts [Internet]. Washington (DC): Gallup. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/163904/less-half-look-restaurant-nutrition-facts.aspx
- Cha E, Kim KH, Lerner HM, Dawkins CR, Bello MK, Umpierrez G, Dunbar SB. 2014. Health literacy, self-efficacy, food label use, and diet in young adults. Am J Health Behav. 38(3):331–339.
- Christoph MJ, Larson N, Laska MN, Neumark-Sztainer D. 2018. Nutrition facts panels: who uses them, what do they use, and how does use relate to dietary intake? J Acad Nutr Diet. 118(2):217–228.
- Dallas SK, Liu PJ, Ubel PA. 2015. Potential problems with increasing serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts label. Appetite. 95:577–584.
- FDA. FDA modernizes nutrition facts label for packaged foods [Internet]. [cited 2016 17 November]. Washington (DC): Food and Drug Administration. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm502182.htm
- FDA. Changes to the Nutrition Facts Label [Internet]. Washington (DC): Food and Drug Administration. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/LabelingNutrition/ucm385663.htm
- Gibbs HD, Ellerbeck EF, Gajewski B, Zhang C, Sullivan DK. 2018. The nutrition literacy assessment instrument is a valid and reliable measure of nutrition literacy in adults with chronic disease. J Nutr Educ Behav. 50(3):247–257.e1.
- Hydock C, Wilson A, Easwar K. 2016. The effects of increased serving sizes on consumption. Appetite. 101:71–79.
- Lackey NS, Pett MA. 2003. Making sense of factor analysis: the use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Incorporated
- Lando AM, Lo SC. 2013. Single-larger-portion-size and dual-column nutrition labeling may help consumers make more healthful food choices. J Acad Nutr Diet. 113(2):241–250.
- McCarthy M. 2016. New US food labels reflect modern serving sizes and added sugar. BMJ. 353:i2960.
- Morris NM, Chew LD, Littenberg B. 2006. The single item literacy screener: evaluation of a brief instrument to identify limited reading ability. BMC Family Practice. 7:21.
- OnlineLabels.com. Free nutrition label generator [Internet]. Sanford (FL): Online Labels. Available from: https://www.onlinelabels.com/label-generator-tools/Nutrition-Label-Generator.aspx
- Persoskie A, Hennessy E, Nelson WL. 2017. US consumers’ understanding of nutrition labels in 2013: the importance of health literacy. Prev Chronic Dis. 14:E86.
- Spanos S, Kenda AS, Vartanian LR. 2015. Can serving-size labels reduce the portion-size effect? A pilot study. Eat Behav. 16:40–41.
- Tavakol M, Dennick R. 2011. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ. 2:53–55.
- Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, Mockbee J, Hale FA. 2005. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 3(6):514–522.
- Zhang Y, Kantor MA, Juan W. 2016. Usage and understanding of serving size information on food labels in the United States. Am J Health Promot. 30(3):181–187.
- Zoellner JCC, Bounds W, Crook L, Yadrick K. 2009. Nutrition literacy status and preferred nutrition communication channels among adults in the lower Mississippi delta. Prev Chronic Disease. 6(4):A128.