Interaction and action mechanism of starch with different phenolic compounds

References

• Barros F, Awika JM, Rooney LW. 2012. Interaction of tannins and other sorghum phenolic compounds with starch and effects on in vitro starch digestibility. J Agric Food Chem. 60:11609–11617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordenave N, Hamaker BR, Ferruzzi MG. 2014. Nature and consequences of non-covalent interactions between flavonoids and macronutrients in foods. Food Funct. 5:18–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buleon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S. 1998. Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis. Int J Biol Macromol. 23:85–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai Y, Wang M, Zhan G. 2013. Interaction between amylose and tea polyphenols modulates the postprandial glycemic response to high-amylose maize starch. J Agric Food Chem. 61:8608–8615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ZH, Schols HA, Voragen A. 2004. Differently sized granules from acetylated potato and sweet potato starches differ in the acetyl substitution pattern of their amylose populations. Carbohydr Polym. 56:219–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe SA, Clegg M, Armengol M, Ryan L. 2013. The polyphenol-rich baobab fruit (Adansonia digitata L.) reduces starch digestion and glycemic response in humans. Nutr Res. 33:888–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf RA, Lammers G, Janssen L, Beenackers A. 1995. Quantitative analysis of chemically modified starches by H-1-NMR spectroscopy. Starch/Stärke. 47:469–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng T, Ye R, Zhuang H, Fang Z, Chen H. 2012. Thermal behavior and gelling interactions of Mesona blumes gum and rice starch mixture. Carbohydr Polym. 90:667–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzar I, Ragaee S, Seetharaman K. 2012. Mechanism of hydrolysis of native and cooked starches from different botanical sources in the presence of tea extracts. J Food Sci. 77:C1192–C1196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. 2006. Comparison of multiple amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 65:712–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. 1983. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 79:926–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawas P, Deka SC. 2017. Effect of modified resistant starch of culinary banana on physicochemical, functional, morphological, diffraction, and thermal properties. Int J Food Prop. 20:133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner KN, Yongye AB, Tschampel SM, Gonzalez-Outeirino J, Daniels CR, Foley BL, Woods RJ. 2008. GLYCAM06: a generalizable biomolecular force field. J Comput Chem. 29:622–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollman P A, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo SH, Chong L, Lee M, Lee T, Duan Y, Wang W, et al. 2000. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res. 33:889–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Saranathan R, Prashanth K, Tiwary BK, Krishna R. 2017. Inhibition of the MurA enzyme in Fusobacterium nucleatum by potential inhibitors identified through computational and in vitro approaches. Mol Biosyst. 13:939–954.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Bourvellec, C, Renard C. 2012. Interactions between polyphenols and macromolecules: quantification methods and mechanisms. Crit Rev Food Sci. 52:213–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Li J, Li H, Xu R, Yuan Y, Cao J. 2019. Physicochemical properties and functional bioactivities of different bonding state polysaccharides extracted from tomato fruit. Carbohydr Polym. 219:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Rubio A, Flanagan BM, Shrestha AK, Gidley MJ, Gilbert EP. 2008. Molecular rearrangement of starch during in vitro digestion: toward a better understanding of enzyme resistant starch formation in processed starches. Biomacromolecule. 9:1951–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma XF, Yu JG. 2004. The effects of plasticizers containing amide groups on the properties of thermoplastic starch. Starch. 56:545–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TD, Malagodi AJ, Chi EY, Evans DG. 2019. Computational study of the driving forces and dynamics of curcumin binding to amyloid-beta protofibrils. J Phys Chem B. 123:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir H, Shahid M, Anjum F, Mudgil D. 2016. Structural, thermal and rheological characterization of modified Dalbergia sissoo gum-a medicinal gum. Int J Biol Macromol. 84:236–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu H, Zhang M, Xia X, Liu Q, Kong B. 2018. Effect of porcine plasma proteinhydrolysates on long-term retrogradation of corn starch. Food Chem. 239:172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obiro WC, Ray SS, Emmambux MN. 2012. V-amylose structural characteristics, methods of preparation, significance, and potential applications. Food Rev Int. 28:412–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohno K, Shimoaka T, Akai N, Katsumoto Y. 2008. Relationship between the broad OH stretching band of methanol and hydrogen-bonding patterns in the liquid phase. J Phys Chem A. 112:7342–7348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel AR, Seijen-ten-Hoorn J, Velikov KP. 2011. Colloidal complexes from associated water soluble cellulose derivative (methylcellulose) and green tea polyphenol (Epigallocatechin gallate). J Colloid Interface Sci. 364:317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe DR, Cheatham TE. 2013. PTRAJ and CPPTRAJ: software for processing and analysis of molecular dynamics trajectory data. J Chem Theory Comput. 9:3084–3095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusch M, Kruger J, Fels G. 2011. Structural stability of V-amylose helices in water-DMSO mixtures analyzed by molecular dynamics. J Chem Theory Comput. 7:2919–2928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velderrain-Rodriguez GR, Palafox-Carlos H, Wall-Medrano A, Ayala-Zavala JF, Chen CYO, Robles-Sanchez M, Astiazaran-Garcia H, Alvarez-Parrilla E, Gonzalez-Aguilar GA. 2014. Phenolic compounds: their journey after intake. Food Funct. 5:189–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei X, Li J, Li B. 2019. Multiple steps and critical behaviors of the binding of tannic acid to wheat starch: effect of the concentration of wheat starch and the mass ratio of tannic acid to wheat starch. Food Hydrocolloid. 94:174–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y, Lin Q, Chen Z, Xiao H. 2011. The interaction between tea polyphenols and rice starch during gelatinization. Food Sci Technol Int. 17:569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F. 2015. Interactions between starch and phenolic compound. Trends Food Sci Technol. 43:129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar