328
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Food analysis and composition

An integrative analytical framework to identify healthy, impactful, and equitable foods: a case study on 100% orange juice

, &
Pages 668-684 | Received 07 Mar 2023, Accepted 23 Jul 2023, Published online: 07 Aug 2023

  • Agarwal S, Fulgoni VLIII, Welland D. 2019. Intake of 100% fruit juice is associated with improved diet quality of adults: NHANES 2013–2016 analysis. Nutrients. 11(10):2513. doi: 10.3390/nu11102513.
  • Arambepola C, Scarborough P, Rayner M. 2008. Validating a nutrient profile model. Public Health Nutr. 11(4):371–378. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000377.
  • Barabási A-L, Menichetti G, Loscalzo J. 2019. The unmapped chemical complexity of our diet. Nat Food. 1(1):33–37. doi: 10.1038/s43016-019-0005-1.
  • Barbosa LR, Lira NBD, Coelho VHR, Silans AMBPD, Gadêlha AN, Almeida CDN. 2019. Stability of soil moisture patterns retrieved at different temporal resolutions in a tropical watershed. Rev Bras Ciênc Solo. 43:1–21. doi: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20180236.
  • Battke F, Müller-Tidow C, Serve H, Nieselt K. 2008. Post-hybridization quality measures for oligos in genome-wide microarray experiments. In: Crandall KA, Lagergren J, editors. Algorithms in Bioinformatics: 8th International Workshop, WABI 2008, Karlsruhe, Germany, September 15-19, 2008. Berlin: Springer; p. 64–75.
  • Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, McGuire V, Cousins M, Stewart Ede Ramos M, Hewitt D, Grambsch PV, Kassim N, et al. 1983. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr. 37(6):986–995. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/32.12.2546.
  • Bedeian AG, Mossholder KW. 2000. On the use of the coefficient of variation as a measure of diversity. Org Res Methods. 3(3):285–297. doi: 10.1177/109442810033005.
  • Bennette C, Vickers A. 2012. Against quantiles: categorization of continuous variables in epidemiologic research, and its discontents. BMC Med Res Methodol. 12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-21.
  • Casas AI, Hassan AA, Manz Q, Wiwie C, Kleikers P, Egea J, López MG, List M, Baumbach J, Schmidt HHHW. 2022. Un-biased housekeeping gene panel selection for high-validity gene expression analysis. Sci Rep. 12(1):12324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15989-8.
  • Collin LJ, Judd S, Safford M, Vaccarino V, Welsh JA. 2019. Association of sugary beverage consumption with mortality risk in US adults: a secondary analysis of data from the REGARDS study. JAMA Netw Open. 2(5):e193121–e193121. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3121.
  • D’Odorico P, Carr JA, Davis KF, Dell’Angelo J, Seekell DA. 2019. Food inequality, injustice, and rights. BioScience. 69(3):180–190. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biz002.
  • Downes M, Carlin JB. 2020. Multilevel regression and poststratification versus survey sample weighting for estimating population quantities in large population health studies. Am J Epidemiol. 189(7):717–725. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa064.
  • Drewnowski A. 2010. The Nutrient Rich Foods Index helps to identify healthy, affordable foods. Am J Clin Nutr. 91(4):1095S–1101S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450D.
  • Drewnowski A, Burton-Freeman B. 2020. A new category-specific nutrient rich food (NRF9f. 3) score adds flavonoids to assess nutrient density of fruit. Food Funct. 11(1):123–130. doi: 10.1039/C9FO02344E.
  • Drewnowski A, Fulgoni VLIII, 2020. New nutrient rich food nutrient density models that include nutrients and MyPlate food groups. Front Nutr. 7:107. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00107.
  • Drewnowski A, Smith J, Fulgoni VL. 2021. The new hybrid nutrient density score NRFh 4: 3: 3 tested in relation to affordable nutrient density and healthy eating index 2015: analyses of NHANES data 2013–16. Nutrients. 13(5):1734. doi: 10.3390/nu13051734.
  • Eke PI, Zhang X, Lu H, Wei L, Thornton-Evans G, Greenlund KJ, Holt JB, Croft JB. 2016. Predicting periodontitis at state and local levels in the United States. J Dent Res. 95(5):515–522. doi: 10.1177/0022034516629112.
  • El-Abbadi NH, Taylor SF, Micha R, Blumberg JB. 2020. Nutrient profiling systems, front of pack labeling, and consumer behavior. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 22(8):36. doi: 10.1007/s11883-020-00857-5.
  • Food Navigator. 2020. Nutrition labelling: who is for and against a harmonised EU-wide approach? [accessed 2021 Nov 26]. https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2020/12/07/Nutrition-labelling-Who-is-for-and-against-a-harmonised-EU-wide-approach.
  • Gao Y, Kennedy L, Simpson D, Gelman A. 2021. Improving multilevel regression and poststratification with structured priors. Bayesian Anal. 16(3):719–744. doi: 10.1214/20-ba1223.
  • Gelman A. 2007. Struggles with survey weighting and regression modeling. Statist Sci. 22(2):153–164. doi: 10.1214/088342306000000691.
  • Gelman A, Little TC. 1997. Poststratification into many categories using hierarchical logistic regression. Surv Methodol. (23):127–135.
  • Ghitza Y, Gelman A. 2013. Deep interactions with MRP: election turnout and voting patterns among small electoral subgroups. Am J Polit Sci. 57(3):762–776. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12004.
  • Greenberg D, Drewnowski A, Black R, Weststrate JA, O’Shea M. 2021. A progressive nutrient profiling system to guide improvements in nutrient density of foods and beverages. Front Nutr. 8:774409. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.774409.
  • Heller J, Givens ML, Yuen TK, Gould S, Jandu MB, Bourcier E, Choi T. 2014. Advancing efforts to achieve health equity: equity metrics for health impact assessment practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 11(11):11054–11064. doi: 10.3390/ijerph111111054.
  • Hoffman RN, Boukabara S-A, Kumar VK, Garrett K, Casey SP, Atlas R. 2017. An empirical cumulative density function approach to defining summary NWP forecast assessment metrics. Month Weather Rev. 145(4):1427–1435. doi: 10.1175/MWR-D-16-0271.1.
  • Joshi NN, Lambert JH. 2007. Equity metrics with risk, performance, and cost objectives for the prioritization of transportation projects. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 54(3):539–547. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2007.900790.
  • Kennedy M. 2020. Orange juice isn’t as healthy as it seems, and experts say it shouldn’t be considered a health food—here’s why. [accessed 2021 Dec 7]. https://www.insider.com/guides/health/diet-nutrition/is-orange-juice-bad-for-you.
  • Khan TA, Chiavaroli L, Zurbau A, Sievenpiper JL. 2019. A lack of consideration of a dose-response relationship can lead to erroneous conclusions regarding 100% fruit juice and the risk of cardiometabolic disease. Eur J Clin Nutr. 73(12):1556–1560. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0514-x.
  • Labonté M-È, Poon T, Gladanac B, Ahmed M, Franco-Arellano B, Rayner M, L’Abbé MR. 2018. Nutrient profile models with applications in government-led nutrition policies aimed at health promotion and noncommunicable disease prevention: a systematic review. Adv Nutr. 9(6):741–788. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy045.
  • Law EA, Bennett NJ, Ives CD, Friedman R, Davis KJ, Archibald C, Wilson KA. 2018. Equity trade‐offs in conservation decision making. Conserv Biol. 32(2):294–303. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13008.
  • Lin M, Zhang X, Holt JB, Robison V, Li C-H, Griffin SO. 2018. Multilevel model to estimate county-level untreated dental caries among US children aged 6–9 years using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Prev Med. 111:291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.015.
  • Lumme S, Manderbacka K, Keskimäki I. 2017. Trends of relative and absolute socioeconomic equity in access to coronary revascularisations in 1995–2010 in Finland: a register study. Int J Equity Health. 16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0536-8.
  • Maillot M, Vieux F, Rehm C, Drewnowski A. 2020. Consumption of 100% orange juice in relation to flavonoid intakes and diet quality among US children and adults: analyses of NHANES 2013–16 data. Front Nutr. 7:63. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.00063.
  • Mainardi F, Drewnowski A, Green H. 2019. Personalized nutrient profiling of food patterns: Nestlé’s nutrition algorithm applied to dietary intakes from NHANES. Nutrients. 11(2):379. doi: 10.3390/nu11020379.
  • Martin CL, Steinfeldt LC, Goldman JD, Moshfegh AJ. 2021. Usual intakes of food pattern components by US children: WWEIA, NHANES 2013–2016. J Food Compos Anal. 102:104063. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2021.104063.
  • Mattoo A, Subramanian A. 2012. Equity in climate change: an analytical review. World Dev. 40(6):1083–1097. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.11.007.
  • McCowan B, Vandeleest J, Balasubramaniam K, Hsieh F, Nathman A, Beisner B. 2022. Measuring dominance certainty and assessing its impact on individual and societal health in a nonhuman primate model: a network approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 377(1845):20200438. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0438.
  • Menichetti G, Ravandi B, Mozaffarian D, Barabasi A-L. 2023. Machine learning prediction of the degree of food processing. Nat Commun. 14:2312. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37457-1.
  • Micha R, Shulkin ML, Peñalvo JL, Khatibzadeh S, Singh GM, Rao M, Fahimi S, Powles J, Mozaffarian D. 2017. Etiologic effects and optimal intakes of foods and nutrients for risk of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes: systematic reviews and meta-analyses from the Nutrition and Chronic Diseases Expert Group (NutriCoDE). PLoS One. 12(4):e0175149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175149.
  • Moore LV, Dodd KW, Thompson FE, Grimm KA, Kim SA, Scanlon KS. 2015. Using behavioral risk factor surveillance system data to estimate the percentage of the population meeting US Department of Agriculture food patterns fruit and vegetable intake recommendations. Am J Epidemiol. 181(12):979–988. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu461.
  • Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, Murayi T, Clemens JC, Rumpler WV, Paul DR, Sebastian RS, Kuczynski KJ, Ingwersen LA. 2008. The US Department of Agriculture automated multiple-pass method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr. 88(2):324–332. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324.
  • Mozaffarian D, El-Abbadi NH, O’Hearn M, Erndt-Marino JD, Masters W, Jacques P, Shi P, Blumberg J, Micha R. 2021. Food compass is a nutrient profiling system using expanded characteristics for assessing healthfulness of foods. Nat Food. 2(10):809–818. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00381-y.
  • Pan B, Ge L, Lai H, Wang Q, Wang Q, Zhang Q, Yin M, Li S, Tian J, Yang K. 2022. Association of soft drink and 100% fruit juice consumption with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases mortality, and cancer mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 62(32):8908–8919. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1937040.
  • Park DK, Gelman A, Bafumi J. 2004. Bayesian multilevel estimation with poststratification: state-level estimates from national polls. Polit Anal. 12(4):375–385. doi: 10.1093/pan/mph024.
  • Peterson H. 2016. Orange juice is being called a massive scam—and now it’s disappearing from breakfast in America. [accessed 2021 Dec 6]. https://www.yahoo.com/news/orange-juice-labeled-massive-scam-202509475.html.
  • Poon T, Labonté M-È, Mulligan C, Ahmed M, Dickinson KM, L’Abbé MR. 2018. Comparison of nutrient profiling models for assessing the nutritional quality of foods: a validation study. Br J Nutr. 120(5):567–582. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001575.
  • Rampersaud G. 2007. A comparison of nutrient density scores for 100% fruit juices. J Food Sci. 72(4):S261–S266. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00324.x.
  • Rampersaud GC, Valim MF. 2017. 100% Citrus juice: nutritional contribution, dietary benefits, and association with anthropometric measures. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 57(1):129–140. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2013.862611.
  • R Core Team. 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • rStudio Team. 2020. Rstudio: integrated development for R. Boston (MA): Rstudio, PBC. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. http://www.rstudio.com/.
  • Shepp SR. 2020. Why you should drink your orange juice. [accessed 2021 Nov 30]. https://floridagrower.net/2020/11/13/why-you-should-drink-your-orange-juice/.
  • Stan Development Team. 2021. Rstan: the R interface to Stan. R package Version 2.21.3. [accessed 2022 Jul 30]. https://mc-stan.org/.
  • Stylianou KS, Fulgoni VL, Jolliet O. 2021. Small targeted dietary changes can yield substantial gains for human health and the environment. Nat Food. 2(8):616–627. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00343-4.
  • Tooze JA, Kipnis V, Buckman DW, Carroll RJ, Freedman LS, Guenther PM, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Dodd KW. 2010. A mixed‐effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: the NCI method. Stat Med. 29(27):2857–2868. doi: 10.1002/sim.4063.
  • Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Guenther PM, Carroll RJ, Kipnis V. 2006. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc. 106(10):1575–1587. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.003.
  • Townsend MS. 2010. Where is the science? What will it take to show that nutrient profiling systems work? Am J Clin Nutr. 91(4):1109S–1115S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450F.
  • Trangucci R, Ali I, Gelman A, Rivers D. 2018. Voting patterns in 2016: exploration using multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) on pre-election polls. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.00842. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.00842.
  • US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. 2020. Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th ed. [accessed 2021 Nov 1]. Available at DietaryGuidelines.gov.
  • US Department of Health and Human Services. 2019. US Department of Agriculture. 2015–2020 dietary guidelines for Americans. December 2015. 9th ed. [accessed 2021 Nov 1]. DietaryGuidelines.gov.
  • van der Bend DLM, van Eijsden M, van Roost MHI, de Graaf K, Roodenburg AJC. 2022. The Nutri-Score algorithm: evaluation of its validation process. Front Nutr. 9:974003. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.974003.
  • Wang W, Rothschild D, Goel S, Gelman A. 2015. Forecasting elections with non-representative polls. Int J Forecast. 31(3):980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2014.06.001.
  • Zurbau A, Au-Yeung F, Blanco Mejia S, Khan TA, Vuksan V, Jovanovski E, Leiter LA, Kendall CWC, Jenkins DJA, Sievenpiper JL. 2020. Relation of different fruit and vegetable sources with incident cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 9(19):e017728. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017728.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.