Accountability and Role Effects in Balanced Scorecard Performance Evaluations When Strategy Timeline Is Specified

References

• Ahn, H. (2001) Applying the balanced scorecard concept: an experience report, Long Range Planning, 34(4), pp. 441–461. doi: 10.1016/S0024-6301(01)00057-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R. (1991) Costs and benefits of judgment errors: implications for debiasing, Psychological Bulletin, 110(3), pp. 486–498. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, H. (2006) Strategy implementation: a role for the balanced scorecard? Management Decision, 44(10), pp. 1441–1460. doi: 10.1108/00251740610715740
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (1994) The magical number seven: still magic after all these years? Psychological Review, 101(2), pp. 353–356. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R., Potter, G. and Srinivasan, D. (2000) An empirical investigation of an incentive plan that includes nonfinancial performance measures, The Accounting Review, 75(1), pp. 65–92. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R., Chang, H. and Pizini, M. (2004) The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy, The Accounting Review, 79(1), pp. 1–23. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broniarczyk, S. and Alba, J. (1994) Theory vs. data in prediction and correlation tasks, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57(1), pp. 117–139. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Jones, D. A. and Widener, S. K. (2004) Managing value creation within the firm: an examination of multiple performance measures, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 16(1), pp. 107–131. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2004.16.1.107
   Google Scholar
• Bukh, P. and Malmi, T. (2005) Re-examining the cause-and-effect principle of the balanced scorecard, in: Jönsson, S., Mouritsen, J. (Eds) Accounting in Scandinavia – The Northern Lights pp. 87–113 (Malmö/Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press).
   Google Scholar
• Burney, L. and Widener, S. K. (2007) Strategic performance measurement systems, job-relevant information, and managerial behavioral responses-role stress and performance, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 19(1), pp. 43–69. doi: 10.2308/bria.2007.19.1.43
   Google Scholar
• Buytendijk, F., Hatch, T. and Micheli, P. (2010) Scenario-based strategy maps, Business Horizons, 53(4), pp. 335–347. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2010.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadez, S. and Guilding, C. (2008) An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7–8), pp. 836–863. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinaels, E. and van Veen-Dirks, P. (2010) Financial versus non-financial information: the impact of information organization and presentation in a Balanced Scorecard, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(6), pp. 565–578. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. and Hannum, K. (2006) 360 degree performance assessment, Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 58(2), pp. 117–122. doi: 10.1037/1065-9293.58.2.117
   Google Scholar
• Davis, S. and Albright, T. (2004) An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance, Management Accounting Research, 15(2), pp. 135–153. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001
   Google Scholar
• DeZoort, T., Harrison, P. and Taylor, M. (2006) Accountability and auditors’ materiality judgments: the effects of differential pressure strength on conservatism, variability, and effort, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(4–5), pp. 373–390. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilla, W. and Steinbart, P. (2005) The effects of alternative supplementary display formats on balanced scorecard judgments, The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 6(3), pp. 159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2004.12.002
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, R. (1991) The performance measurement manifesto, Harvard Business Review, 69(1), pp. 131–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. M., Kadous, K. and Towry, K. L. (2012) Does the communication of causal linkages improve employee effort allocations and firm performance? An experimental investigation, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 24(1), pp. 77–102. doi: 10.2308/jmar-50149
   Google Scholar
• Favere-Marchesi, M. and Pincus, K. (2006) The impact of accountability on auditors’ processing of nondiagnostic evidence, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 9(1), pp. 1–26. doi: 10.1016/S1475-1488(06)09001-6
   Google Scholar
• Franco-Santos, M. and Bourne, M. (2005) An examination of the literature relating to issues affecting how companies manage through measures, Production Planning & Control, 16(2), pp. 114–124. doi: 10.1080/09537280512331333020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D. (2005) Alternative measures of managers’ performance, controllability, and the outcome effect, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 17(1), pp. 55–70. doi: 10.2308/bria.2005.17.1.55
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. and Langston, W. (1992) Comprehension of illustrated text: pictures help to build mental models, Journal of Memory and Language, 31(2), pp. 129–151. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90008-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. M. and Schaubroeck, J. (1988) A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings, Personnel Psychology, 41(1), pp. 43–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S. and Hastie, R. (1990) Hindsight: biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known, Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), pp. 311–327. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidemeier, H. and Moser, K. (2009) Self-other agreement in job performance ratings: a meta-analytic test of a process model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), pp. 353–370. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, V. and Patton, J. (1997) Accountability, the dilution effect, and conservatism in auditors’ fraud judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), pp. 227–238. doi: 10.2307/2491362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque, Z. and James, W. (2000) Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: impact on organizational performance, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12(1), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Ittner, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1998) Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction, Journal of Accounting Research, 36(Supplement), pp. 1–35. doi: 10.2307/2491304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittner, C., Larcker, D. F. and Meyer, M. (2003a) Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard, The Accounting Review, 78(3), pp. 725–758. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittner, C., Larcker, D. F. and Randall, T. (2003b) Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7–8), pp. 715–741. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. and Hatfield, R. (2005) A note on the relation between frames, perceptions, and taxpayer behavior, Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(1), pp. 145–164. doi: 10.1506/L5LA-L863-CF9K-WEJ5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. and Haynes, C. (2003) The persuasiveness of client preferences: an investigation of the impact of preference timing and client credibility, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), pp. 143–154. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E. and Nisbett, R. E. (1971) The Actor and Observer: Divergent Perceptions of the Causes of Behavior (Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. (2009) Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard, in: Chapman, C., Hopwood, A., Shields, M. (Eds) Handbook of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 3, pp. 1253–1269 (Oxford: Elsevier).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1992) The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, 70(1), pp. 71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (1996) The Balanced Scorecard (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. and Norton, D. (2000) The Strategy Focused Organization. How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation).
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. and Wisner, P. S. (2009) The judgmental effects of management communications of a fifth balanced scorecard category on performance evaluation, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 21(2), pp. 37–56. doi: 10.2308/bria.2009.21.2.37
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., Samuels, J. and Peterson, M. (2012) An examination of the effect of positive and negative performance on the relative weighting of strategically and non-strategically linked balanced scorecard measures, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(2), pp. 13–151. doi: 10.2308/bria-50114
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. (2010) Accuracy of relative weights on multiple leading performance measures: effects on managerial performance and knowledge, Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(2), pp. 577–608. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klayman, J. and Ha, Y. (1987) Confirmation, discontinuation, and information in hypothesis testing, Psychological Review, 94(2), pp. 211–228. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce, L., Anderson, U. and Marchant, G. (1995) Justification of decisions in auditing, Journal of Accounting Research, 33(2), pp. 369–384. doi: 10.2307/2491493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, R., Luft, J. and Shields, M. (2005) Effects of accounting-method choices on subjective performance-measure weighting decisions: experimental evidence on precision and error covariance, The Accounting Review, 80(4), pp. 1163–1192. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.4.1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrie, G. and Cobbold, I. (2004) Third-generation balanced scorecard: evolution of an effective strategic control tool, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(7), pp. 611–623. doi: 10.1108/17410400410561231
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. and Tetlock, P. (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability, Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), pp. 255–275. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. and Tetlock, P. (2003) Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and decision making: the impact of accountability on cognitive biases, in: Schneider, S., Shanteau, J. (Eds) Emerging Perspectives on Judgment and Decision Research pp. 431–457 (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R., Bloomfield, R. and Nelson, M. (2002) Experimental research in financial accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(8), pp. 775–810. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, T., Salterio, S. and Webb, A. (2004) The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment, The Accounting Review, 79(4), pp. 1075–1094. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedtka, S. L., Church, B. K. and Ray, M. R. (2008) Performance variability, ambiguity intolerance, and balanced scorecard-based performance assessments, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(2), pp. 73–88. doi: 10.2308/bria.2008.20.2.73
   Google Scholar
• Lipe, M. and Salterio, S. (2000) The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures, The Accounting Review, 75(3), pp. 283–298. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipe, M. and Salterio, S. (2002) A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), pp. 531–540. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00059-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J. and Shields, M. (2001) Why does fixation persist? Experimental evidence on the judgment performance effects of expensing intangibles, The Accounting Review, 76(4), pp. 561–587. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.4.561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J., Shields, M. and Thomas, T. (2012) Effects of the Availability of Additional Accounting Information on Management Decisions and Subjective Performance Evaluations, Working Paper, Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Malina, M. and Selto, F. (2001) Communicating and controlling strategy: an empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13(1), pp. 47–90. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, L. and Simmons, L. (2007) Auditors’ assessment and incorporation of expectation precision in evidential analytical procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), pp. 1–18. doi: 10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J. and Wasserman, W. (2005) Applied Linear Statistical Models (New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin).
   Google Scholar
• Nørreklit, H. (2000) The balance on the balanced scorecard-A critical analysis of some of its assumptions, Management Accounting Research, 11(1), pp. 65–88. doi: 10.1006/mare.1999.0121
   Google Scholar
• Papalexandris, A., Ioannou, G., Prastacos, G. and Soderquist, K. (2005) An integrated methodology for putting the balanced scorecard into action, European Management Journal, 23(2), pp. 214–227. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2005.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. L., Albright, T. L. and Hibbets, A. R. (2004) Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 16(1), pp. 75–88. doi: 10.2308/bria.2004.16.1.75
   Google Scholar
• Sawers, K. (2005) Evidence of choice avoidance in capital-investment judgments, Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), pp. 1063–1092. doi: 10.1506/2UKM-AW62-BNA6-0AP6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanteau, J. (1988) Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers, Acta Psychologica, 68(1–3), pp. 203–215. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(88)90056-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Jacobs, K. and Yates, J. (1996) Effects of procedural and outcome accountability on judgment quality, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(1), pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayler, W. B. (2010) The balanced scorecard as a strategy-evaluation tool: the effects of implementation involvement and a causal-chain focus, The Accounting Review, 85(3), pp. 1095–1117. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. and Boettger, R. (1989) Accountability: a social magnifier of the dilution effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), pp. 388–398. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P., Lerner, J. and Boettger, R. (1996) The dilution effect: judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both? European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(6), pp. 915–934. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199611)26:6<915::AID-EJSP797>3.0.CO;2-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vera-Muñoz, S., Shackell, M. and Buehner, M. (2007) Accountants’ usage of causal business models in the presence of benchmark data: a note, Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), pp. 1015–1038. doi: 10.1506/car.24.3.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, E. (1982) The actor and the observer: how are their perception of causality divergent? Psychological Bulletin, 92(3), pp. 682–800. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.92.3.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. and Zimbelman, M. (2004) Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues, Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), pp. 719–745. doi: 10.1506/HGXP-4DBH-59D1-3FHJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong-On-Wing, B., Guo, L., Li, W. and Yang, D. (2007) Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), pp. 363–377. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar