Do (Fe)Male Auditors Impair Audit Quality? Evidence from Going-Concern Opinions

References

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1993). In the public interest: A special report by the public oversights board of the SEC practice section. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Gough, F., Grey, C., & Robson, K. (2000). In the name of the client: The service ethic in two international accounting firms. Human Relations, 53(9), 1151–1174. doi: 10.1177/0018726700539003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, A., Davidson, L. F., Rama, D. V., & Thiruvadi, S. (2010). CFO gender and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 24(1), 25–41. doi: 10.2308/acch.2010.24.1.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, J. C., Reis, D. R., Curtis, M. B., & Jenkins, J. G. (2008). Risk monitoring and control in audit firms: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 187–218. doi: 10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi, R. A., & Arnold, D. F.Sr. (1997). An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firm. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(4), 653–668. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00545.x
   Google Scholar
• Birnberg, J. G. (2011). A proposed framework for behavioral accounting research. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(1), 1–43. doi: 10.2308/bria.2011.23.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 393–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00569.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branson, J., & Breesch, D. (2004). Referral as a determining factor for changing auditors in the Belgian auditing market: An empirical study. International Journal of Accounting, 39(3), 307–328. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2004.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2009). The effects of auditor gender on audit quality. The IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 8(3–4), 78–107.
   Google Scholar
• Buis, M. L. (2010). Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in non-linear models. The Stata Journal, 10(2), 305–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrows, G., & Black, C. (1998). Profit sharing in Australian Big 6 accounting firms: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5–6), 517–530. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00063-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. The Accounting Review, 75(4), 453–468. doi: 10.2308/accr.2000.75.4.453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following ‘New’ going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78(1): 95–117.
   Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Palmrose, Z.-V. (1994). Auditor litigation and modified reporting on bankrupt clients. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(Suppl.), 1–30. doi: 10.2307/2491436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Vanstraelen, A., & Willenborg, M. (2009). Rules rather than discretion in audit standards: Going-concern opinions in Belgium. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1395–1428. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., Kortum, S., & Moroney, R. (2012). Auditors’ going-concern-modified opinions after 2001: Measuring reporting accuracy. Accounting and Finance, 52(4), 1041–1059. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Sun, S. Y. J., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85(1), 127–158. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, H.-Y., & Chin, C.-L. (2011). Firm versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 201–229. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C.-L., & Chi, H.-Y. (2008, August 3–6). Sex matters: Gender differences in audit quality. Working paper. Presented at the 2008 annual meeting of the American Accounting Association, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C.-L., & Chi, H.-Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26(3), 729–766. doi: 10.1506/car.26.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., & Kallapur, S. (2003). Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 78(4), 931–956. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J., & Monroe, G. S. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, 111–126.
   Google Scholar
• Church, B. K., Davis, S. M., & McCracken, S. A. (2008). The auditor's reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons, 22(1), 69–90. doi: 10.2308/acch.2008.22.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448–474. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after sarbanes-oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Suppl.), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Raghunandan, K., & Subramanyam, K. R. (2002). Do nonaudit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going-concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1247–1274. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopuch, N., Holthausen, R. W., & Leftwich, R. W. (1987). Predicting audit qualifications with financial and market variables. The Accounting Review, 62(3), 431–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, P. C., Davidson, R. A., & Schwartz, B. N. (2001). The effect of organizational culture and ethical orientation on accountants’ ethical judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(2), 101–121. doi: 10.1023/A:1012261900281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36(4), 345–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(2), 125–152. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Krishnan, J. (1999). Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), 135–165. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00577.x
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the U.S. audit market. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 113–136. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Yu, M. D. (2009). Big four office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1521–1552. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeremynck, A., & Willekens, M. (2003). The endogenous relationship between audit-report type and business termination: Evidence on private firms in a non-litigious environment. Accounting and Business Research, 33(1), 65–79. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2003.9729632
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., Raghunandan, K., & Rama, D. V. (1998). Costs associated with going-concern modified audit opinions: An analysis of auditor changes, subsequent opinions, and client failures. Advances in Accounting, 16, 117–139.
   Google Scholar
• Gerson, K. (1993). No man's land: Men's changing commitments to family and work. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gold, A., Hunton, J. E., & Gomaa, M. I. (2009). The impact of client and auditor gender on auditors’ judgments. Accounting Horizons, 23(1), 1–18. doi: 10.2308/acch.2009.23.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (2011). Audit partner business and audit quality. Working paper. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1799681
   Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2012). Male and female auditor's overconfidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(1), 105–118. doi: 10.1108/02686901211186126
   Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. (2013). Gender differences in overconfidence and risk taking: Do self-selection and socialization matter? Economics Letters, 118(3), 442–444. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., & Khalifa, R. (2014). Methodological considerations for research on gender in accounting. Working paper.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5(4), 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941–952. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., & Langli, J. C. (2010). Auditor independence in a private firm and low litigation risk setting. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 573–605. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.2.573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, W., McKeown, J., & Mutchler, J. (1994). A reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going-concern opinion decision. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 409–431. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00400.x
   Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., & Peni, E. (2012). Auditor's gender and audit fees. International Journal of Auditing, 16(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2011.00438.x
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, G. J., Deis, D. R., Bedard, J. C., & Curtis, M. B. (2008). Accounting firm culture and governance: A research synthesis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), 45–74. doi: 10.2308/bria.2008.20.1.45
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, K., & Bedard, J. C. (2004). Auditors’ portfolio management decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 659–690. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonnergård, K., Stafsudd, A., & Elg, U. (2010). Performance evaluations as gender barriers in professional organizations: A study of auditing firms. Gender, Work and Organization, 17(6), 721–747. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00488.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, R. W., & Vanstraelen, A. (2007). The relationship between auditor tenure and audit quality implied by going concern opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 113–132. doi: 10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, C. W., Weber, M., & Wüstemann, J. (2012). Can auditors be independent? Experimental evidence on the effects of client type. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 797–823. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.629416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Krishnan, J. (1996). The role of economic trade-offs in the audit opinion decision: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 11(4), 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., Francis, J., & Wang, Z. (2012). Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 589–616. doi: 10.2308/accr-10195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C.-Y., & Tan, H.-T. (2008). Non-audit service fees and audit quality: The impact of auditor specialization. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1), 199–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2006). Practising gender at work: Further thoughts on reflexivity. Gender, Work and Organization, 13(3), 254–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, L., & Subramaniam, N. (2009). Ethical evaluations and behavioural intentions of early career accountants: The impact of mentors, peers and individual attributes. Accounting & Finance, 49(3), 619–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00301.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. (1992). Do we need to consider the individual auditor when discussing auditor independence? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(2), 74–84. doi: 10.1108/09513579210011871
   Google Scholar
• Mutchler, J. F., Hopwood, W., & McKeown, J. C. (1997). The influence of contrary information and mitigating factors on audit opinion decisions on bankrupt companies. Journal of Accounting Research, 35(2), 295–310. doi: 10.2307/2491367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996–2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375–414. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, T., Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1994). The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 32(2), 241–261. doi: 10.2307/2491284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooghe, H., & Spaenjers, C. (2005). De FiTO-meter: Een nieuwe, eenvoudige en geïntegreerde maatstaf voor de financiële toestand van een onderneming. Accountancy & Bedrijfskunde, 25(3), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2010). The relationship between demographic variables and ethical decision making of trainee accountants. International Journal of Auditing, 14(1), 79–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00404.x
   Google Scholar
• Reichelt, K. J., & Wang, D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), 647–686. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, K. J., & Francis, J. R. (2000). Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30(3), 375–400. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Barbadillo, E., Gómez-Aguilar, N., De Fuentes-Barberá, C., & García-Benau, M. A. (2004). Audit quality and the going-concern decision-making process: Spanish evidence. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 597–620. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000216820
   Google Scholar
• Sarens, G., Reheul, A.-M., Van Caneghem, T., De Vlamincken, N., & Dierick, J. (2012). De rol van de bedrijfsrevisor in bedrijven die niet verplicht zijn een bedrijfsrevisor aan te stellen. Antwerpen: Maklu.
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, S. W. (1999). The effect of experience on the use of irrelevant evidence in auditor judgment. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 217–224. doi: 10.2308/accr.1999.74.2.217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (2003, January 15). Audit quality and audit firm size: Revisited. Working paper presented at the 2004 Midyear Auditing Section Doctoral Consortium, Clearwater Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Sloane, P. J., & Williams, H. (2000). Job satisfaction, comparison earnings and gender. Labour, 14(3), 473–502. doi: 10.1111/1467-9914.00142
   Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., & Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610–1644. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12035.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B., Arnold, D., & Pierce, B. (2010). The impact of perceived ethical culture of the firm and demographic variables on auditors’ ethical evaluation and intention to act decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(4), 531–551. doi: 10.1007/s10551-009-0237-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A. (2002). Auditor economic incentives and going-concern opinions in a limited litigious continental European business environment: Empirical evidence from Belgium. Accounting and Business Research, 32(3), 171–186. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2002.9728966
   Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A. (2003). Going-concern opinions, auditor switching, and the self-fulfiiling prophecy effect examined in the regulatory context of Belgium. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 18(2), 231–253.
   Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., & Willekens, M. (2008). Audit regulation in Belgium: Overregulation in a limited capital market oriented country? In R. Quick, S. Turley, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Auditing, trust and governance: Regulation in Europe (pp. 19–41). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Tendeloo, B., & Vanstraelen, A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe. European Accounting Review, 17(3), 447–470. doi: 10.1080/09638180802016684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallman, S. M. H. (1996). The future of accounting, part III: Reliability and auditor independence. Accounting Horizons, 10(4), 76–97.
   Google Scholar
• Willekens, M., & Gaeremynck, A. (2005). Prijszetting in de Belgische auditmarkt. Brugge: die Keure.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., Franis, B., & Hasan, I. (2013). The impact of CFO gender on bank loan contracting. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 28(1), 53–78. doi: 10.1177/0148558X12452399
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S. A. (2003). How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 267–286. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.267
   Google Scholar
• Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(1), 312–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar