The Role of Roles in Risk Management Change: The Case of an Italian Bank

References

• Angelini, P., & Cetorelli, N. (2003). The effects of regulatory reform on competition in the banking industry. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 35, 663–684. doi:10.1353/mcb.2003.0033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 659–675. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, G., & Davies, M. (2000). Value-based management: Context and application. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. S., & Frigo, M. L. (2007). Strategic risk management: Creating and protecting value. Strategic Finance, 88(11), 25–31. Retrieved from http://www.imanet.org/PDFs/Public/SF/2007_05/05_07_beasley.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. S., & Frigo, M. L. (2010). ERM and its role in strategic planning and strategy execution. In J. Fraser & B. J. Simkins (Eds.), Enterprise risk management: Today's leading research and best practices for tomorrow's executives (pp. 31–50). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009). Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature. The British Accounting Review, 41, 2–20. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A. (2009). Risk management, corporate governance and management accounting: Emerging interdependencies. Management Accounting Research, 20, 2–5. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazejewski, S. (2011). When truth is the daughter of time: Longitudinal case studies in international business research. In R. Piekkari & C. Welch (Eds.), Rethinking the case study in international business and management research (pp. 251–276). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal, L. B., Sitkin, S. B., & Long, C. P. (2004). Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organization Science, 15, 411–431. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M., & Berry, A. J. (2002). Risk in the process of budgeting. Management Accounting Research, 13, 273–297. doi:10.1006/mare.2002.0190
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P. M., Berry, A. J., & Burke, G. T. (2007). Risk and management accounting: Best practice guidelines for enterprise-wide internal control procedures. Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (1992). Internal control – integrated framework. New York, NY: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2004). Enterprise risk management framework. New York, NY: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. (1992). Report of the committee on the financial aspects of corporate governance (Cadbury Report). London: Gee.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2009). Global risk management survey, sixth edition: Risk management in the spotlight. Retrieved from http://www.ucop.edu/enterprise-risk-management/_files/deloitte_globalrskmgtsrvy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Euske, K. J., & Riccaboni, A. (1999). Stability to profitability: Managing interdependencies to meet a new environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 463–481. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00020-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council. (2003). The combined code on corporate governance. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fiori, G., & Tiscini, R. (2005). Corporate governance, regolamentazione contabile e trasparenza dell'informativa aziendale [Corporate governance, accounting regulation and transparency in corporate disclosure]. Milan: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Golden, B. R. (1992). The past is the past – or is it? The use of retrospective accounts as indicators of past strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 848–860. doi:10.2307/256318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. The Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1052–1081. doi:10.2307/256645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022–1054. doi:10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K., & Suddaby, R. (2008). Introduction. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 1–46). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, C., & Scheytt, T. (2013). The dispositif of risk management: Reconstructing risk management after the financial crisis. Management Accounting Research, 24, 88–99. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. (1999). Internal control: Guidance for directors on the combined code (Turnbull Report). London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of International Finance. (2008). Final report of the IIF Committee on market best practices: Principles of conduct and best practice recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.iif.com/download.php?id=Osk8Cwl08yw=
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO 31000: Risk management: Principles and guidelines. Geneva: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, R. S. (2009). Risk management and the strategy execution system. Balanced Scorecard Report in Harvard Business Publishing Newsletters, 11(6), 3–8. Retrieved from http://www.exed.hbs.edu/assets/Documents/risk-management-strategy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, G. (2009). The corporate governance lessons from the financial crisis. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, 1, 61–87. doi:10.1787/fmt-v2009-art3-en
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Accounting change: Explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 25, 27–70. doi:10.1108/09513571211191743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnan, M., & Markarian, G. (2011). Accounting, governance and the crisis: Is risk the missing link? European Accounting Review, 20, 215–231. doi:10.1080/09638180.2011.580943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, J. (1988). Reliability and validity in field research: Some strategies and tactics. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1, 34–54. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000004619
   Google Scholar
• Mikes, A. (2008). Chief risk officers at crunch time: Compliance champions or business partners? Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, 2, 7–25. Retrieved from http://www.henrystewartpublications.com/jrm
   Google Scholar
• Mikes, A. (2009). Risk management and calculative cultures. Management Accounting Research, 20, 18–40. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikes, A. (2011). From counting risk to making risk count: Boundary-work in risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 226–245. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikes, A., Hall, M., & Millo, Y. (2013). How experts gain influence. Harvard Business Review, 91, 70–74. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O'Leary, T. (2008). Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 942–967. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moll, J., Burns, J., & Major, M. (2006). Institutional theory. In Z. Hoque (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories and methods (pp. 183–205). London: Spiramus.
   Google Scholar
• O'Dwyer, B. (2004). Qualitative data analysis: Illuminating a process for transforming a ‘messy’ but ‘attractive’ ‘nuisance’. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scenes view of using qualitative research methods (pp. 391–407). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Paape, L., & Speklé, R. F. (2012). The adoption and design of enterprise risk management practices: An empirical study. European Accounting Review, 21, 533–564. doi:10.1080/09638180.2012.661937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. (1990). Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. Organization Science, 1, 267–292. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2004). The risk management of everything: Rethinking the politics of uncertainty. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2005a). Enterprise risk management and the organization of uncertainty in financial institutions. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A. Preda (Eds.), The sociology of financial markets (pp. 250–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2005b). Organizational responses to risk: The rise of the chief risk officer. In B. Hutter & M. K. Power (Eds.), Organisational encounters with risk (pp. 132–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2007). Organized uncertainty: Designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. K. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 849–855. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risk and Insurance Management Society. (2009). The 2008 financial crisis: A wake-up call for enterprise risk management. Retrieved from http://www.ucop.edu/enterprise-risk-management/_files/2008fincrisis_wakeupcall.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. J., Scapens, R. W., & Theobald, M. (Eds.). (2002). Research method and methodology in finance and accounting (2nd ed.). London: Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). H.R. 3763. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Scapens, R. W. (2004). Doing case-study research. In C. Humphrey & B. Lee (Eds.), The real life guide to accounting research: A behind-the-scenes view of using qualitative research methods (pp. 257–281). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Scheytt, T., Soin, K., Sahlin-Andersson, K., & Power, M. K. (2006). Introduction: Organizations, risk and regulation. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1331–1337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00646.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soin, K., & Scheytt, T. (2008). Management accounting in financial services. In C. S. Chapman, A. G. Hopwood, & M. D. Shields (Eds.), The handbook of management accounting research (Vol. 3, pp. 1385–1395). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F., & Page, M. (2003). Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 16, 640–661. doi:10.1108/09513570310492335
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stede, W. A. (2009, February). Enterprise governance. Financial Management, pp. 38–40. Retrieved from http://www.fm-magazine.com/
   Google Scholar
• Van der Stede, W. A. (2011). Management accounting research in the wake of the crisis: Some reflections. European Accounting Review, 20, 605–623. doi:10.1080/09638180.2011.627678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström, G. (2009). Risk management versus operational action: Basel II in a Swedish context. Management Accounting Research, 20, 53–68. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2009). A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research, 20, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2011). Risk management in organizations: An integrated case study approach. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar