Are Joint Audits Associated with Higher Audit Fees?

References

• Antle, R., Gordon, E., Narayanamoorthy, G., & Zhou, L. (2006). The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27(3), 235–266. doi: 10.1007/s11156-006-9430-y
   Google Scholar
• Auditing Practice Board. (2009, October 6). Consultation on audit firms providing nonaudit services to listed companies that they audit. London, UK, p 38. Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/APB/Consultation-on-audit-firms-providing-non-audit-se-File.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Audousset-Coulier, S. (in press). Audit fees in joint audit setting. European Accounting Review. doi:10.1080/09638180.2014.892787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorité des Marchés Financiers. (2012, July 26). Etude relative aux honoraires versés aux commissaires aux comptes et à leur réseau au titre de la période 2011 par les groupes du CAC 40, de l'Eurostoxx 50 et d'un échantillon de 41 sociétés des compartiments B et C d'Eurolist, Paris, p. 13. Retrieved from http://www.amf-france.org/Publications/Rapports-etudes-et-analyses.html
   Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Piot, C., & Schatt, A. (2012). Was the European Commission Green Paper right? An evaluation of the French experience with joint auditing. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2165595
   Google Scholar
• Broye, G., & Schatt, A. (2012). Comment ont évolué les honoraires d'audit en France pendant la crise financière? Revue Française de Comptabilité, 456, 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler, D. C., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5), 983–1016. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.5.983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M. (2007). Auditing in Italy: The development of a highly-regulated setting before and after the Parmalat case. In R. Quick, S. Turley, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Auditing, trust and governance: Developing regulation in Europe (pp. 144–167). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., Francis, J., Marra, A., & Pettinicchio, A. (in press). Are there adverse consequences of mandatory auditor rotation? Evidence from the Italian experience. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., & Pettinicchio, A. (2011). The effect of audit firm mandatory rotation rule. In M. A. Frison-Roche (Ed.), Vers quelle régulation de l'audit faut-il aller? (pp. 77–89). Lextenso edition. Paris: LGDJ.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Simnett, R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2013, September 28). Auditing the auditors: An international analysis of the effectiveness of national inspection regimes on audit quality. Working paper presented at the EARNET conference, Trier.
   Google Scholar
• Causholli, M., Hay, D., DeMartinis, M., & Knechel, W. R. (2010). Audit markets, fees and production: Towards an integrated view of empirical audit research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29(1), 167–215.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A. (2008). Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 55–99. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Simunic, D. A. (2009). Cross-listing audit fee premiums: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1429–1463. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craswell, A., & Francis, J. (1999). Pricing of initial audit engagement. The Accounting Review, 74(2), 201–216. doi: 10.2308/accr.1999.74.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2/3), 344–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2013). A review of archival auditing research. Working paper U. of Missouri, p. 156. Retrieved from http://mitsloan.mit.edu/events/jae/pdf/DeFond-Zhang.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88(3), 430–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010, October 13). Green paper – audit policy: Lessons from the crisis, Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2010/audit/green_paper_audit_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011a, November 30). Commission staff working paper – impact assessment, Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/reform/impact_assesment_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011b, November 30). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council amending directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts, Brussels. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/reform/directive_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing Commission Decision 2005/909/EC. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014R0537&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M., & Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of western European corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 65(3), 365–395. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields, L. P., Fraser, D., & Wilkins, M. (2004). An investigation of the pricing of audit services for financial institutions. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23(3), 53–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (1984). The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), 133–151. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 30(2), 125–152. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Michas, P. N., & Seavey, S. E. (2013). Does audit market concentration harm the quality of audited earnings? Evidence from audit markets in 42 countries. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(1), 325–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2012.01156.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Richard, C., & Vanstraelen, A. (2009). Assessing France's joint audits requirement: Are two heads better than one? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 28(2), 35–63. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (1986). Audit prices, product differentiation, and scale economies: Further evidence from the Australian market. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(2), 383–393. doi: 10.2307/2491141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2007). Determinants of audit fees for French quoted firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 139–160. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718654
   Google Scholar
• Gounelle, P. (2007). L'image de l'auditeur ne correspond pas à la réalité. Option Finance, 937, 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Haskins, M. E., & Williams, D. D. (1988). The association between client factors and audit fees: A comparison by country and by firm. Accounting and Business Research, 18(70), 183–190. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1988.9729363
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D. (2012). Further evidence from meta-analysis of audit fee research. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1918501
   Google Scholar
• Hay, D., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Fees: a meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191. doi: 10.1506/4XR4-KT5V-E8CN-91GX
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Treasury Committee. (2009, May 15). Banking crisis: Reforming corporate governance and pay in the City, HC 519. London: The Stationery Office by Order of the House, p. 116. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmtreasy/519/519.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., Kausar, A., Loft, A., & Woods, M. (2011). Regulating audit beyond the crisis: A critical discussion of the EU Green Paper. European Accounting Review, 20(3), 431–457. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.597201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ianniello, G. (2012). Non-audit services and auditor independence in the 2007 Italian regulatory environment. International Journal of Auditing, 16(2), 147–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2012.00447.x
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. B., Liu, X., & Zheng, L. (2012). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on audit fees: Theory and evidence. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 2061–2094. doi: 10.2308/accr-50223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. doi: 10.1086/250042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesage, C., Ratzinger-Sakel, N., & Kettunen, J. M. (2012). Struggle over joint audit: On behalf of public interest? Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2176729
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Vourc'h, J., & Morand, P. (2011). Study on the effects of the implementation of the ‘acquis’ on statutory audits of annual and consolidated accounts including the consequences on the audit market (Final Report). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/auditing/docs/other/full_study_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Magnan, M. (2008). Discussion of ‘Audit pricing, legal liability regimes, and Big 4 premiums: Theory and cross-country evidence’. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(1), 101–108. doi: 10.1506/car.25.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maijoor, S., & Vanstraelen, A. (2006). Earnings management within Europe: The effects of member state audit environment, audit firm quality and international capital markets. Accounting and Business Research, 36(1), 33–52. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730005
   Google Scholar
• Mikol, A., & Standish, P. (1998). Auditor independence and non-audit services: A comparative study in differing British and French perspectives. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 541–569. doi: 10.1080/096381898336411
   Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z.-V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97–110. doi: 10.2307/2490806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piot, C. (2007). Auditor concentration in a joint auditing environment: The French market 1997–2003. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(2), 161–176. doi: 10.1108/02686900710718663
   Google Scholar
• Seetharaman, A., Gul, F. A., & Lynn, S. G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 91–115. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00046-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. (2005). Understanding regulation. European Financial Management, 11(4), 439–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1354-7798.2005.00291.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–90. doi: 10.2307/2490397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 15(2), 119–134.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. H., & Simon, D. T. (1999). Determinants of audit fees: The importance of litigation, disclosure and regulatory burdens in audit engagements in 20 countries. International Journal of Auditing, 34(3), 375–388.
   Google Scholar
• Thinggaard, F., & Kiertzner, L. (2008). Determinants of audit fees: Evidence from a small capital market with a joint audit requirement. International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 141–158. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00377.x
   Google Scholar
• Trombetta, M., Wagenhofer, A., & Wysocki, P. (2012). The usefulness of academic research in understanding the effects of accounting standards. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 127–146. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720871
   Google Scholar
• Whisenant, S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). Evidence on the joint determination of audit and non-audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), 721–744. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, M. (1997). An examination of cultural influence on audit environment. Research in Accounting Regulation, 11(Supplement), 129–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., Haapamäki, E., Järvinen, T., & Niemi, L. (2012). Do joint audits improve audit quality? Evidence from voluntary joint audits. European Accounting Review, 21(4), 731–765. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.678599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar