How Will the Court Decide? – Tax Experts’ versus Laymen's Predictions

References

• Andersson, P., Edman, J., & Ekman, M. (2005). Predicting the World Cup 2002 in soccer: Performance and confidence of experts and non-experts. International Journal of Forecasting, 21(3), 565–576. doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, F. L., Jackson, B. R., & Hite, P. S. (1989). The economic benefits of regulation: Evidence from professional tax preparers. The Accounting Review, 64(2), 300–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrick, J. A. (2001). The effect of code section knowledge on tax-research performance. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 23(2), 20–34. doi: 10.2308/jata.2001.23.2.20
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, C., Persson, M., & Willenhag, P. (2005). Gender and overconfidence. Economics Letters, 86(2), 199–203. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2004.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobek, D. D., Hageman, A. M., & Hatfield, R. C. (2010). The role of client advocacy in the development of tax professionals’ advice. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 32(1), 25–51. doi: 10.2308/jata.2010.32.1.25
   Google Scholar
• Borghans, L., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J. J., & Weel, B. T. (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 972–1059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., & Lovallo, D. (1999). Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. American Economic Review, 89(1), 306–318. doi: 10.1257/aer.89.1.306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, O. H., & McCarty, T. M. (1988). Evidence on judgment involving the determination of substantial authority: Tax practitioners versus students. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 10(2), 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Clement, M. B., Koonce, L., & Lopez, T. J. (2007). The roles of task-specific forecasting experience and innate ability in understanding analyst forecasting performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(3), 378–398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloyd, C. B. (1997). Performance in tax research tasks: The joint effects of knowledge and accountability. The Accounting Review, 72(1), 111–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccia, A. D., Hackenbrack, K., & Nelson, M. W. (1995). The ability of professional standards to mitigate aggressive reporting. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 227–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Lohse, G. L., & Kottemann, J. E. (1994). Harmful effects of seemingly helpful information on forecasts of stock earnings. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2), 253–267. doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. S., & Mason, J. D. (2003). Similarity and precedent in tax authority judgment. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 25(1), 53–71. doi: 10.2308/jata.2003.25.1.53
   Google Scholar
• Gervais, S., & Odean, T. (2001). Learning to be overconfident. Review of Financial Studies, 14(1), 1–27. doi: 10.1093/rfs/14.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, M., Langer, T., & Weber, M. (2013). True overconfidence in interval estimates: Evidence based on a new measure of miscalibration. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(5), 405–417. doi: 10.1002/bdm.1773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman-Delahunty, J., Granhag, P. A., Hartwig, M., & Loftus, E. F. (2010). Insightful or wishful: Lawyers’ ability to predict case outcomes. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 16(2), 133–157. doi: 10.1037/a0019060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 411–435. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, W. M., & Meehl, P. E. (1996). Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 293–323. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilary, G., & Hsu, C. (2011). Endogenous overconfidence in managerial forecasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 300–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadous, K., Magro, A. M., & Spilker, B. C. (2008). Do effects of client preference on accounting professionals’ information search and subsequent judgments persist with high practice Risk? The Accounting Review, 83(1), 133–156. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. doi: 10.1037/a0016755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O'Connor, M., & Önkal, D. (2006). Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25 years. Twenty Five Years of Forecasting, 22(3), 493–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawsky, S. B. (2009). Probably? Understanding Tax Law's uncertainty. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 157(4), 1017–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2), 159–183. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. F., & Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Lawyers’ predictions of success. Jurimetrics Journal, 28, 437–453.
   Google Scholar
• Magro, A. M. (2005). Knowledge, adaptivity, and performance in tax research. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 703–722. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.2.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkhoff, L., Schmeling, M., & Schmidt, U. (2013). Overconfidence, experience, and professionalism: An experimental study. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 86, 92–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L. F., Robinson, L. A., & Sansing, R. C. (2010). FIN 48 and tax compliance. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1721–1742. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önkal, D., Yates, J. F., Simga-Mugan, C., & Öztin, Ş. (2003). Professional vs. amateur judgment accuracy: The case of foreign exchange rates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91(2), 169–185. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00058-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruger, T. W., Kim, P. T., Martin, A. D., & Quinn, K. M. (2004). The supreme court forecasting project: Legal and political science approaches to predicting supreme court decision making. Columbia Law Review, 104(4), 1150–1210. doi: 10.2307/4099370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samelson, D., & Jeffrey, C. (2000). Accuracy and calibration in professional judgment: A study of tax practitioners. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 3, 153–176. doi: 10.1016/S1474-7979(00)03030-1
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. (2002). Assessing and predicting who wins federal tax trial decisions. Wake Forest Law Review, 37, 473–529.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. M. (2005). Using the social background model to explain who wins federal appellate tax decisions: Do less traditional judges favor the taxpayer. Virginia Tax Review, 25, 201–249.
   Google Scholar
• Staudt, N., Epstein, L., & Wiedenbeck, P. (2006). Ideological component of judging in the taxation context. The, Washington University Law Review, 84(7), 1797–1821.
   Google Scholar
• Törngren, G., & Montgomery, H. (2004). Worse than chance? Performance and confidence among professionals and laypeople in the stock market. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 5(3), 148–153. doi: 10.1207/s15427579jpfm0503_3
   Google Scholar