Are Corporate Tax Reductions Real Benefits under Imputation Systems?

References

• Agrawal, A., & Jayaraman, N. (1994). The dividend policies of all equity firms: A direct test of free cash flow theory. Managerial Decision Economics, 15, 139–148. doi:10.1002/mde.4090150206
   Google Scholar
• Allen, F., Bernardo, A. E., & Welch, I. (2000). A theory of dividends based on tax clienteles. Journal of Finance, 55, 2499–2536. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bajaj, M., & Vijh, A. M. (1990). Dividend clienteles and the information content of dividend changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 193–219. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(90)90003-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, E. L., Legoria, J., & Sellers, K. F. (2000) Capital investment effects of dividend imputation. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22(1), 40–59. doi:10.2308/jata.2000.22.2.40
   Google Scholar
• Boissay, F., & Gropp, R. (2013). Payment defaults and interfirm liquidity provision. Review of Finance, 17, 1853–1894. doi:10.1093/rof/rfs045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M. C., & Gupta, S. (2011). An empirical investigation of the effect of imputation credits on remittance of overseas dividends. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 7, 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.jcae.2011.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Dahlquist, M., & Robertsson, G. (2001). Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. Journal of Financial Economics, 59, 413–440. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00092-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Z., Lev, B., & Narin, F. (1999). Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(3), 20–32. doi:10.2469/faj.v55.n3.2269
   Google Scholar
• Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1994). The information content of dividend changes: Cash flow signaling, overinvestment, and dividend clienteles. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 29, 567–587. doi:10.2307/2331110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D., Erickson, M., & Trezevant, R. (1999). A test of the theory of tax clienteles for dividend policies. National Tax Journal, 52, 179–194. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41789388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dichev, I., & Skinner, D. (2002). Large-sample evidence on the debt covenant hypothesis. Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1091–1123. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.00083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divecha, A., & Morse, D. (1983). Market responses to dividend increases and changes in payout ratios. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 18, 163–173. doi:10.2307/2330915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyckman, T., Philbrick, D., & Stephan, J. (1984). A comparison of event study methodologies using daily stock returns: a simulation approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 1–33. doi:10.2307/2490855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterbrook, F. (1984). Two agency-cost explanations of dividends. American Economic Review, 74, 650–659. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1805130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elton, E., & Gruber, M. (1970). Marginal stockholder tax rates and the clientele effect. Review of Economics and Statistics, 52, 68–74. doi:10.2307/1927599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E., & French, K. (2001). Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay. Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 3–43. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00038-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoly, D., & Hayn, G. (1992). The valuation of the deferred tax liability: Evidence from the stock market. The Accounting Review, 67, 394–410. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/247732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, R. (1972). The corporate dividend-saving decision. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 1527–1541. doi:10.2307/2329932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 11–16. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511609435.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, J., & Stulz, R. (1997). Why is there a home bias? An analysis of foreign portfolio equity ownership in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics, 46, 3–28. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassila, D. R., Omer, T. C., Shelley, M. K., & Smith, L. M. (2010). Do complexity, governance, and auditor independence influence whether firms retain their auditors for tax services? Journal of the American Taxation Association, 32, 1–23. doi:10.2308/jata.2010.32.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Lintner, J. (1956). Distribution of incomes of corporations among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes. American Economic Review, 46, 97–113. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1910664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omer, T. C., Bedard, J. C., & Falsetta, D. (2006). Auditor-provided tax services: The effects of a changing regulatory environment. The Accounting Review, 81, 1095–1117. doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.5.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattenden, K. (2006). Capital structure decisions under classical and imputation tax systems: A natural test for tax effects in Australia. Australian Journal of Management, 31, 67–92. doi:10.1177/031289620603100105
   Google Scholar
• Pattenden, K., & Twite, G. (2008). Taxes and dividend policy under alternative tax regimes. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prevost, A., Rao, R. P., & Wagster, J. D. (2002). Dividend imputation and shareholder wealth: The case of New Zealand. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 29, 1079–1104. doi:10.1111/1468-5957.00462
   Google Scholar
• Rozeff, M. S. (1982). Growth, beta and agency costs as determinants of dividend payout ratios. Journal of Financial Research, 5, 249–259. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6803.1982.tb00299.x
   Google Scholar
• Schulman, C. T., Thomas, D. W., Sellers, K. F., & Kennedy, D. B. (1996). Effects of tax integration and capital gains tax on corporate leverage. National Tax Journal, 49, 31–54. Retrieved from http://www.ntanet.org/NTJ/49/1/ntj-v49n01p31-54-effects-tax-integration-capital.html
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard & Poor's. (2008). Corporate ratings criteria. Standard & Poor's Ratings Services. Retrieved from http://www.standardandpoors.com
   Google Scholar
• Twite, G. (2001). Capital structure choices and taxes: Evidence from the Australian dividend imputation tax system. International Review of Finance, 2, 217–234. doi:10.1111/1468-2443.00027
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. (2003). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College.
   Google Scholar