The Effect of Tax Privacy on Tax Compliance – An Experimental Investigation

References

• Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
   Google Scholar
• Alm, J. (1991). A perspective on the experimental analysis of taxpayer reporting. The Accounting Review, 577–593. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/247810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J. (2010). Testing behavioral public economics theories in the laboratory. National Tax Journal, 63, 635–658. doi: 10.17310/ntj.2010.4.02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J. (2012). Measuring, explaining, and controlling tax evasion: Lessons from theory, experiments, and field studies. International Tax and Public Finance, 19, 54–77. doi: 10.1007/s10797-011-9171-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21–38. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreoni, J., & Petrie, R. (2004). Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605–1623. doi: 10.1016/s0047-2727(03)00040-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldry, J. C. (1986). Tax evasion is not a gamble: A report on two experiments. Economics Letters, 22, 333–335. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(86)90092-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, P. J., & Jung, W. O. (1989). Taxpayers’ reporting decisions and auditing under information asymmetry. Accounting Review, 64(3), 468–487. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/247600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. The American Economic Review, 96, 1652–1678. doi: 10.3386/w11535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bø, E. E., Slemrod, J., & Thoresen, T. O. (2015). Taxes on the internet: Deterrence effects of public disclosure. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 7(1), 36–62. doi: 10.1257/pol.20130330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bock, O., Baetge, I., & Nicklisch, A. (2014). hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. European Economic Review, 71, 117–120. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolle, F., & Otto, P. E. (2010). A price is a signal: On intrinsic motivation, crowding-out, and crowding-in. Kyklos, 63, 9–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco, L., & Mittone, L. (1997). Tax evasion and moral constraints: Some experimental evidence. Kyklos, 50, 297–324. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B., & Miller, D. L. (2012). Robust inference with multiway clustering. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 238–249. doi: 10.1198/jbes.2010.07136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. (1998). Expressive law and economics. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 585–607. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.111408
   Google Scholar
• Coricelli, G., Joly, M., Montmarquette, C., & Villeval, M. C. (2010). Cheating, emotions, and rationality: An experiment on tax evasion. Experimental Economics, 13, 226–247. doi: 10.1007/s10683-010-9237-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis, J., Jones, P., & Savoia, A. (2012). Social norms and tax compliance: Framing the decision to pay tax. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 159–168. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2011.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85. Retrieved from http://www.uv.es/~friasnav/Davis_1980.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulleck, U., Fooken, J., Newton, C., Ristl, A., Schaffner, M., & Torgler, B. (2016). Tax compliance and psychic costs: Behavioral experimental evidence using a physiological marker. Journal of Public Economics, 134, 9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durham, Y., Manly, T. S., & Ritsema, C. (2014). The effects of income source, context, and income level on tax compliance decisions in a dynamic experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 220–233. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. S. (1994). The role of moral sentiments and audits perceptions in tax compliance. Public Finance, 49(Supplement), 70–89.
   Google Scholar
• Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35, 136–159. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.900359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graetz, M. J., Reinganum, J. F., & Wilde, L. L. (1986). The tax compliance game: Toward an interactive theory of law enforcement. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 2, 1–32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/764914
   Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, M., Hoopes, J. L., Ishida, R., & Slemrod, J. (2013). The effect of public disclosure on reported taxable income: Evidence from individuals and corporations in Japan. National Tax Journal, 66, 571–608. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1653948
   Google Scholar
• Hitz, J. M., Ernstberger, J., & Stich, M. (2012). Enforcement of accounting standards in Europe: Capital-market-based evidence for the two-tier mechanism in Germany. European Accounting Review, 21, 253–281. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2011.641727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review, 92, 1644–1655. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S., Kübler, D., & Weibull, J. (2012). Social norms and economic incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83, 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IRS. (2016). Tax gap estimates for tax years 2008–2010. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/PUP/newsroom/tax%20gap%20estimates%20for%202008%20through%202010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laury, S., & Wallace, S. (2005). Confidentiality and taxpayer compliance. National Tax Journal, 58, 427–438. doi: 10.17310/ntj.2005.3.08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, M., Pestieau, P., Riedl, A., & Villeval, M. C. (2015). Tax evasion and social information: An experiment in Belgium, France and the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance, 22, 401–425. doi: 10.1007/s10797-014-9318-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel, D. (2001). Are shaming punishments beautifully retributive: Retributivism and the implications for the alternative sanctions debate. Vanderbilt Law Review, 54, 2157–2242. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr54&div=77&g_sent=1&collection=journals
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of personality, 40, 525–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00078.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, L. F., & Sansing, R. C. (2000). Strategic tax and financial reporting decisions: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17, 85–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2000.tb00912.x
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Truglia, R., & Troiano, U. (2016). Shaming tax delinquents: Evidence from a field experiment in the United States. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2558115 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2558115.
   Google Scholar
• Pickhardt, M., & Prinz, A. (2014). Behavioral dynamics of tax evasion – a survey. Journal of Economic Psychology, 40, 1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinganum, J. F., & Wilde, L. L. (1986). Equilibrium verification and reporting policies in a model of tax compliance. International Economic Review, 27(3), 739–760. doi: 10.2307/2526692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansing, R. C. (1993). Information acquisition in a tax compliance game. Accounting Review, 68(4), 874–884. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/248510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, C. (2010). Social norms and conditional cooperative taxpayers. European Journal of Political Economy, 26, 89–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wartick, M. L., Madeo, S. A., & Vines C. C. (1999). Reward dominance in tax-reporting experiments: The role of context. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 21, 20–31. doi: 10.2308/jata.1999.21.1.20
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly, 249, 29–38.
   Google Scholar