The Effect of Aggregation of Accounting Information via Segment Reporting on Accounting Conservatism

References

• Ball, R. (2001). Infrastructure requirements for an economically efficient system of public financial reporting and disclosure. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Financial Services, 127–169.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Bushman, R., & Vasvari, F. (2008). The debt-contracting value of information and loan syndicate structure. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 247–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00273.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2013a). Econometrics of the Basu asymmetric timeliness coefficient and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 51, 1071–1097. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Kothari, S. P., & Nikolaev, V. V. (2013b). On estimating conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 88, 755–787. doi: 10.2308/accr-50371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Robin, A., & Sadka, G. (2008). Is financial reporting shaped by equity markets or by debt markets? An international study of timeliness and conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 13, 168–205. doi: 10.1007/s11142-007-9064-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 77–104. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S. (1997). The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24, 3–37. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bens, D., Berger, P., & Monahan, S. (2011). Discretionary disclosure in financial reporting: An examination comparing internal firm data to externally reported segment data. The Accounting Review, 86, 417–449. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bens, D., & Johnston, R. (2009). Accounting discretion: Use or abuse? An analysis of restructuring charges surrounding regulator action. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 673–699. doi: 10.1506/car.26.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bens, D., & Monahan, S. (2004). Disclosure quality and the excess value of diversification. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 691–730. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. G., & Hann, R. N. (2003). The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 163–223. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.00100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. G., & Hann, R. N. (2007). Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure. The Accounting Review, 82, 869–906. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, P. G., & Ofek, E. (1995). Diversification's effect on firm value. Journal of Financial Economics, 37, 39–65. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111, 1043–1075. doi: 10.1086/376950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D., Lys, T., & Walther, B. (2010). The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, B., García Lara, J., & Tribó J. (2014). The relation between segment disclosure and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33, 449–469. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campa, J. M., & Kedia, S. (2002). Explaining the diversification discount. The Journal of Finance, 57, 1731–1762. doi: 10.1111/1540-6261.00476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2003). Heterogeneous investment opportunities in multiple-segment firms and the incremental value relevance of segment accounting data. The Accounting Review, 78, 397–428. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D., Hribar, P., & Tian, X. (2014). Cash flow asymmetry: Causes and implications for conditional conservatism research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 173–200. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52, 135–160. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03811.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, J. R., Muller III, K. A., & Riedl, E. J. (2007). Asymmetric timeliness tests of accounting conservatism. Review of Accounting Studies, 12, 95–124. doi: 10.1007/s11142-006-9023-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettredge, M., Kwon, S. Y., Smith, D., & Stone, M. (2006). The effect of SFAS No. 131 on the cross-segment variability of profits reported by multiple segment firms. Review of Accounting Studies, 11, 91–117. doi: 10.1007/s11142-006-6397-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettredge, M., Kwon, S. Y., Smith, D., & Zarowin, P. (2005). The impact of SFAS no. 131 business segment data on the market's ability to anticipate future earnings. The Accounting Review, 80, 773–804. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J., Hanna, J. D., & Vincent, L. (1996). Causes and effects of discretionary asset write-offs. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 117–134. doi: 10.2307/2491429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco, F., Urcan, O., & Vasvari, F. P. (2016). Corporate diversification and the cost of debt: The role of segment disclosures. The Accounting Review, 91, 1139–1165. doi: 10.2308/accr-51325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García Lara, J., García Osma, B., & Penalva F. (2014). Information consequences of accounting conservatism. European Accounting Review, 23, 173–198. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.882263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoly, D., & Hayn, C. (2000). The changing time-series properties of earnings, cash flows and accruals: Has financial reporting become more conservative? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29, 287–320. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00024-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givoly, D., Hayn, C., & D’Souza, J. (1999). Measurement errors and information content of segment reporting. Review of Accounting Studies, 4, 15–43. doi: 10.1023/A:1009633904773
   Google Scholar
• Guidry, F., Leone, A., & Rock, S. (1999). Earnings-based bonus plans and earnings management by business unit managers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 26, 113–142. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00037-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M. (1998). The association between competition and managers’ business segment reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 111–128. doi: 10.2307/2491323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R. M., & Lundholm, R. (1996). Segment reporting to the capital market in the presences of a competitor. Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 261–279. doi: 10.2307/2491502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthausen, R. W., & Watts, R. L. (2001). The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31, 3–75. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00029-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, O.-K., & Thomas, W. (2008). Managerial empire building and firm disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 46, 591–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00289.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. (2009). Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48, 132–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, L., & Stulz, R. (1994). Tobin’s Q, corporate diversification and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1248–1280. doi: 10.1086/261970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewellen, W. G. (1971). A pure financial rationale for the conglomerate merger. Journal of Finance, 26, 521–537. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1971.tb00912.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, O. (2002). Shopping for bargain-priced companies? Avoid asset impairment traps. The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 13, 63–70. doi: 10.1002/jcaf.10055
   Google Scholar
• Nurnberg, N., & Dittmar Jr., N. (1996). Auditing considerations of FASB 121. Journal of Accountancy 182(1), 71–78.
   Google Scholar
• Patatoukas, P., & Thomas, J. (2011). More evidence of bias in the differential timeliness measure of conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 86, 1765–1793. doi: 10.2308/accr-10101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patatoukas, P., & Thomas, J. (2016). Placebo tests of conditional conservatism. The Accounting Review, 91, 625–648. doi: 10.2308/accr-51179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S. (2006). Identifying conditional conservatism. European Accounting Review, 15, 511–525. doi: 10.1080/09638180601102099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, S. (2013, May). One for all or all for one? The unit-of-account issue. Compliance Week, 10, 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, S. (1989). Attributes of industry, industry segment and firm-specific information in security valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 5, 592–614. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00726.x
   Google Scholar
• Villalonga, B. (2004). Does diversification cause the ‘diversification discount’? Financial Management, 33, 5–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. (2003a). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17, 207–221. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R. L. (2003b). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17, 287–301. doi: 10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287
   Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Moerman, R. (2008). The role of information asymmetry and financial reporting quality in debt trading: Evidence from the secondary loan market. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46, 240–260. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar