Choosing an Accounting Method to Explain Public Policy: Social Return on Investment and UK Non-profit Sector Policy

References

• Abma, T. A. (1997). Playing with/in plurality: Revitalizing realities and relationships in Rotterdam. Evaluation, 3, 25–48. doi: 10.1177/135638909700300103
   Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89. doi: 10.2307/2393986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2004). Accounting for flexibility and efficiency: A field study of management control systems in a restaurant chain. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21, 271–302. doi: 10.1506/VJR6-RP75-7GUX-XH0X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amernic, J. H. (1985). The roles of accounting in collective bargaining. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(2), 227–253. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90018-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, S., & Euske, K. J. (1987). Rational, rationalizing, and reifying uses of accounting data in organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(6), 549–570. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(87)90008-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antheaume, N. (2004). Valuing external costs. From theory to practice: Implications for full cost environmental accounting. European Accounting Review, 13, 443–464.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2013). Social impact measurement and non-profit organizations: Compliance, resistance, and promotion. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 25, 869–886. doi: 10.1007/s11266-013-9373-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidson, M., Lyon, F., McKay, S., & Moro, D. (2013). Valuing the social? The nature and controversies of measuring social return on investment (SROI). Voluntary Sector Review, 4, 3–18. doi: 10.1332/204080513X661554
   Google Scholar
• Bagnoli, L., & Megali, C. (2011). Measuring performance in social enterprises. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 149–165. doi: 10.1177/0899764009351111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Brown, J., & Frame, B. (2007). Accounting technologies and sustainability assessment models. Ecological Economics, 61, 224–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunza, D., & Stark, D. (2012). From dissonance to resonance: Cognitive interdependence in quantitative finance. Economy and Society, 41(3), 383–417. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.638155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, G. (2000). Public discourse and decision making. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13, 27–64. doi: 10.1108/09513570010316135
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., & Hopwood, A. (1985). Accounting in its social context: Towards a history of value added in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10, 381–413. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(85)90002-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, S., Clubb, C., Hopwood, A., Hughes, J., & Nahapiet, J. (1980). The roles of accounting in organizations and society. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5, 5–27. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(80)90017-3
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office, Office of the Third Sector. (2009). A guide to social return on investment. London. Retrieved from https://www.bond.org.uk/data/files/Cabinet_office_A_guide_to_Social_Return_on_Investment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cardinaels, E. (2008). The interplay between cost accounting knowledge and presentation formats in cost-based decision-making. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 582–602. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers, B. G. (2009). Can social science numbers save public policy from politics? Regulation and Governance, 3, 287–290. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01055.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, A., & Krovi, R. (1999). Representational congruence and information retrieval: Towards an extended model of cognitive fit. Decision Support Systems, 25, 271–288. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charities Evaluation Service. (2008). Accountability and learning: Developing monitoring and evaluation in the third sector (research report).
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Franco, G., Hope, O., Dushyantkumar, V., & Zhou, Y. (2014). Analyst report readability. Contemporary Accounting Research. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durie, S., Hutton, E., & Robbie, K. (2007). Investing in impact: Developing social return on investment. Retrieved from www.forthsectordevelopment.org.uk/documents/SROI_Report_Investing_in_Impact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R. (2011). Professionalising British central government bureaucracy c.1850: The accounting dimension. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 30, 217–235. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2004). Sustainable Value Added—measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 48, 173–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frame, B., & Cavanagh, J. (2009). Experiences of sustainability assessment: An awkward adolescence. Accounting Forum, 33, 195–208. doi: 10.1016/j.accfor.2008.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2014). Guidance on the strategic report. Retrieved July 28, 2014, from http://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Accounting-and-Reporting-Policy/Guidance-on-the-Strategic-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, J., & Dey, C. (2011). Developments in social impact measurement in the third sector: Scaling up or dumbing down? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 63–72. doi: 10.1080/0969160X.2011.556399
   Google Scholar
• Graves, O. F., & Radcliffe, V. S. (2001). Guest editorial. A call for papers: Histories of accounting and public policy. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 20, 91–96. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4254(01)00021-7
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society: Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 687–708. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00003-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability … and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 47–62. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M., Millo, Y., & Barman, E. (2015). Who and what really counts? Stakeholder prioritization and accounting for social value. Journal of Management Studies, 52(7), 907–934. doi: 10.1111/joms.12146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, T., & Haughton, G. (2007). Assessing the economic and social impacts of social enterprises. Retrieved from http://cdn.socialtraders.com.au/app/uploads/2016/05/Assessing-the-Economic-and-Social-Impacts-of-Social-Enterprise-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hasselbladh, H., & Kallinikos, J. (2000). The project of rationalization: A critique and reappraisal of neo-institutionalism in organization studies. Organization Studies, 21(4), 697–720. doi: 10.1177/0170840600214002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2002). The role of the voluntary and community sector in service delivery: A cross cutting review. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/ccr_voluntary_report.htm
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2003). The Green Book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government: Treasury guidance. Stationery Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/220541/green_book_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2004). Exploring the role of the third sector in public service delivery and reform. London: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2006). Value for money assessment guidance. UK Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/252858/vfm_assessmentguidance061006opt.pdf
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2007a). The future role of the third sector in social and economic regeneration: final report.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2007b). Building the evidence base: Third sector values in the delivery of public services. London.
   Google Scholar
• Huault, I., & Rainelli-Weiss, H. (2011). A market for weather risk? Conflicting metrics, attempts at compromise, and limits to commensuration. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1395–1419. doi: 10.1177/0170840611421251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadous, K., Koonce, L., & Towry, K. L. (2005). Quantification and persuasion in managerial judgement. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(3), 643–686. doi: 10.1506/568U-W2FH-9YQM-QG30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelton, A. S., Pennington, R. R., & Tuttle, B. M. (2010). The effects of information presentation format on judgment and decision making: A review of the information systems research. Journal of Information Systems, 24, 79–105. doi: 10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.79
   Google Scholar
• Kitching, K. (2009). Audit value and charitable organizations. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28, 510–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev, B. (2001). Intangibles: Management, measurement, and reporting. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45, 221–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2009). The usefulness of inaccurate models: Towards an understanding of the emergence of financial risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5), 638–653. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 47–90. doi: 10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47
   Google Scholar
• McCoyd, J. L., & Kerson, T. S. (2006). Conducting intensive interviews using email: A serendipitous comparative opportunity. Qualitative Social Work, 5, 389–406. doi: 10.1177/1473325006067367
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation (NEF) (2004a). Measuring social impact: the foundation of social return on investment (SROI). Retrieved from https://volunteer.ca/content/measuring-social-impact
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation (NEF) (2004b). Social return on investment, Valuing what matters: Findings and recommendations from a pilot study. Retrieved from http://www.i-r-e.org/bdf/docs/a004_sroi-valuing-what-matters.pdf
   Google Scholar
• New Economics Foundation (NEF) (2007). Measuring Real Value: A DIY Guide to Social Return on Investment. Retrieved from http://xarxanet.org/sites/default/files/nef-diyguide-for-sroi.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J. (2007). Why measuring and communicating social value can help social enterprise become more competitive. Retrieved from http://cdn.socialtraders.com.au/app/uploads/2016/05/Why-Measuring-and-Communicating-Social-Value-Can-Help-Social-Enterprise-Become-More-Competitive.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Northcott, D., & Alkaraan, F. (2007). Strategic investment appraisal. In T. Hopper, D. Northcott, & R. Scapens (Eds.), Issues in management accounting (3rd ed., pp. 199–222). Essex: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31, 391–398. doi: 10.1002/nur.20259
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, L. S., & Miranti, P. J. (1996). Louis D. Bradies and standard cost accounting: A study of the construction of historical agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(6), 569–586. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00033-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. (1996). Measuring social wealth: A study of social audit practice for community and co-operative enterprises. London: New Economics Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, J. (2001). Social audit and accounting manual. Edinburgh: Community Business Scotland (CBS) Network.
   Google Scholar
• Pingle, G. (1978). The early development of cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 29, 63–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1978.tb02399.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Administration Select Committee. (2008a). Public Services and the Third Sector: Rhetoric and Reality. Volume I. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubadm/112/112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Public Administration Select Committee. (2008b). Public Services and the Third Sector: Rhetoric and Reality. Volume II. Oral and written evidence. Retrieved from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmpubadm/112/112ii.pdf
   Google Scholar
• REDF. (2000). SROI methodology: Analyzing the value of social purpose enterprise within a social return on investment framework. San Francisco: REDF.
   Google Scholar
• Samiolo, R. (2012). Commensuration and styles of reasoning: Venice, cost–benefit, and the defence of place. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 382–402. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.82.3.498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schommer-Aikins, M., & Hutter, R. (2002). Epistemological beliefs and thinking about everyday controversial issues. The Journal of Psychology, 136(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/00223980209604134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfam, I. L. (1937). The interstate commerce commission: An appraisal. The Yale Law Journal, 46(6), 915–954. doi: 10.2307/792048
   Google Scholar
• Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4, 107–118. doi: 10.1177/1468794104041110
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, L. (2002). Telephone interviewing: Is it compatible with interpretive phenomenological research? Contemporary Nurse, 12, 58–63. doi: 10.5172/conu.12.1.58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2000). Voice of the past: Oral history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tinkelman, D. (2009). Unintended consequences of expense ratio guidelines: The Avon breast cancer walks. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 28, 485–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2009.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi, W. K. (2009). The devaluation of life. Regulation and Governance, 3, 103–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01052.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, S. P. (2004). Expense, social and moral control: Accounting and the administration of the old poor law in England and Wales. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 23, 85–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2004.02.001
   Google Scholar