Audit Team Attributes Matter: How Diversity Affects Audit Quality

References

• Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 127–136. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. (1978). Commission on auditors responsibilities (Cohen commission). Report, conclusions, and recommendations. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Antle, R., Gordon, E., Narayanamoorthy, G., & Zhou, L. (2006). The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 27, 235–266. doi: 10.1007/s11156-006-9430-y
   Google Scholar
• Antle, R., & Nalebuff, B. (1991). Conservatism and auditor–client negotiations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(Supplement), 31–54. doi: 10.2307/2491002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78, 611–639. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, C., DeFond, M., Jiambalvo, J., & Subramanyam, K. R. (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15, 1–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1998.tb00547.x
   Google Scholar
• Billor, N., Hadi, A. S., & Velleman, P. F. (2000). Bacon: Blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 34, 279–298. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9473(99)00101-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M. (2007). Auditing in Italy: The development of a highly-regulated setting before and after the Parmalat case. In R. Quick, S. Turley, & M. Willekens (Eds.), Auditing, trust and governance: Developing regulation in Europe (pp. 144–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., Francis, J. R., Marra, A., & Pettinicchio, A. (2015a). Are there adverse consequences of mandatory auditor rotation? Evidence from the Italian experience. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 1–24. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., Prencipe, A., & Trombetta, M. (2015b). Mandatory audit firm rotation and audit quality. European Accounting Review, 25, 35–58. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.921446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D., Epstein, M. J., & Martinez-Jerez, F. A. (2011). The learning effects of monitoring. The Accounting Review, 86, 1909–1934. doi: 10.2308/accr-10129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion, M. A., Papper, E. M., & Medsker, G. J. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49, 429–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01806.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, P., & Simnett, R. (2006). Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 81, 653–676. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.3.653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Sun, S. Y., & Wu, D. (2010). Client importance, institutional improvements, and audit quality in China: An office and individual auditor level analysis. The Accounting Review, 85, 127–158. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.1.127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C.-L., & Chi, H. Y. (2009). Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 729–765. doi: 10.1506/car.26.3.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. H., Kim, C., Kim, J. B., & Zang, Y. (2010). Audit office size, audit quality, and audit pricing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 73–97. doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H. S., & Kallapur, S. (2003). Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 78, 931–955. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.4.931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, J., & Monroe, G. (2001). A research note on the effects of gender and task complexity on an audit judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 13, 111–125. doi: 10.2308/bria.2001.13.1.111
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Frazzini, A., & Malloy, C. (2008). The small world of investing: Board connections and mutual fund returns. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 951–979. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w13121 doi: 10.1086/592415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. G., & Parker, S. K. (2010). Team capability beliefs over time: Distinguishing between team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 1003–1023. doi: 10.1348/096317909X484271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consiglio Nazionale dei Dottori Commercialisti – Consiglio Nazionale dei Ragionieri e Professionisti Contabili (CNDC-CNRPC). (2007). Principi di Revisione. Il Sole 24 Ore.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20, 297–322. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. R., Soo, B. S., & Trompeter, G. M. (2009). Auditor tenure and the ability to meet or beat earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26, 517–548. doi: 10.1506/car.26.2.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Park, C. W. (2001). The reversal of abnormal accruals and the market valuation of earnings surprises. The Accounting Review, 76, 375–404. doi: 10.2308/accr.2001.76.3.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 275–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaan, M., Stark, D., & Vedres, B. (2015). Game changer: The topology of creativity. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1144–1194. doi: 10.1086/681213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. (2011). Cultural network. In J. Scott & P. J.Carringotn (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2004). Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms: The role of management control systems as knowledge integration mechanisms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 401–421. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2003.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditillo, A. (2012). Designing management control systems to foster knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive firms: A network-based approach. European Accounting Review, 21, 425–450. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.661939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopuch, N., Gupta, M., Simunic, D., & Stein, M. (2003). Production efficiency and the pricing of audit services. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20, 47–77. doi: 10.1506/6UDH-HM5M-3W63-PKJP
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C. (2009). Appropriate audit support system use: The influence of auditor, audit team, and firm factors. The Accounting Review, 84, 771–810. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckaus, R. S. (1961). The north–south differential in Italian economic development. The Journal of Economic History, 21, 285–317. doi: 10.1017/S002205070010292X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilifsen, A., Messier, W. F., Glover, S. M., & Prawitt, D. F. (2010). Auditing and assurance services (Second International Edition). London: Mc Graw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ewelt-Knauer, C., Gold, A., & Pott, C. (2012). What do we know about mandatory audit firm rotation. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants in Scotland (ICAS). Retrieved September 22, 2016, from https://www.icas.com/technical-resources/what-do-we-know-about-mandatory-audit-firm-rotation
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, T. A., Rittenberg, L. E., & Trompeter, G. M. (1987). An investigation of the impact of economic and organizational factors on auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 7(1), l–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, G. D., & Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work & Organization, 8, 205–225. doi: 10.1111/1468-0432.00129
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A. C., Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (2006). What matters in audit pricing: Industry specialization or overall market leadership? Accounting & Finance, 46, 97–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.2005.00152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. M. (1996). A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1112–1142. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1996.9704071865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2004). What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36, 345–368. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R. (2011). A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), 125–152. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., & Michas, P. N. (2013). The contagion effect of low-quality audits. The Accounting Review, 88, 521–552. doi: 10.2308/accr-50322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Pinnuck, M. L., & Watanabe, O. (2014). Auditor style and financial statement comparability. The Accounting Review, 89, 605–633. doi: 10.2308/accr-50642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., Reichelt, K., & Wang, D. (2005). The pricing of national and city-specific reputations for industry expertise in the US audit market. The Accounting Review, 80, 113–136. doi: 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaeremynck, A., Knechel, R., & Willekens, M. (2010). Materiality and the relative efficiency of audit engagements: A distinction between managerial and environmental audit (in) efficiency. Working Paper. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Gaynor, L. M., Kelton, A. S., Mercer, M., & Yohn, T. L. (2016). Understanding the relation between financial reporting quality and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(4), 1–22. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, M. A., & Raghunandan, K. (2002). Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(1), 67–78. doi: 10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gietzmann, M. B., & Sen, P. K. (2002). Improving auditor independence through selective mandatory rotation. International Journal of Auditing, 6, 183–210. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2002.tb00012.x
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J., & Wu, D. (2016). What is the relationship between audit partner busyness and audit quality? Contemporary Accounting Research, 33, 341–377. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, R. W. (1983). Objective and social sources of information in task redesign: A field experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 184–200. doi: 10.2307/2392617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F. A., Wu, D., & Yang, Z. (2013). Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88, 1993–2023. doi: 10.2308/accr-50536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenbrack, K., & Knechel, W. R. (1997). Resource allocation decisions in audit engagements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14, 481–499. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00537.x
   Google Scholar
• Hall, M., & Smith, D. (2009). Mentoring and turnover intentions in public accounting firms: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 695–704. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardies, K., Breesch, D., & Branson, J. L. (2016). Do (Fe)Male auditors impair audit quality? Evidence from going-concern opinions. European Accounting Review, 25, 7–34. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.921445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, B. H., & Kim, S. (2009). It pays to have friends. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 138–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii, J., & Xuan, Y. (2014). Acquirer-target social ties and merger outcomes. Journal of Financial Economics, 112, 344–363. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., & Vähämaa, S. (2013). Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27, 205–228. doi: 10.2308/acch-50400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. E., & Joshi, A. (2011). Work team diversity. In S. Zedck (Ed.), Apa handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 651–686). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E., Johnson, I., Khurana, I. K., & Reynolds, J. K. (2002). Audit firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19, 637–660. doi: 10.1506/LLTH-JXQV-8CEW-8MXD
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2007). Context matters: A multilevel framework for work team diversity research. In J. J. Martocchio (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resource management (pp. 1–48). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Roh, H. (2009). The role of context in work team diversity research: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 599–627. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2009.41331491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, R. (1982). The effects of group longevity on project communication and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27, 81–104. doi: 10.2307/2392547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Rouse, P., & Schelleman, C. (2009). A modified audit production framework: Evaluating the relative efficiency of audit engagements. The Accounting Review, 84, 1607–1638. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., & Sharma, D. S. (2012). Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre- and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(4), 85–114. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-10298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Vanstraelen, A., & Zerni, M. (2015). Does the identity of engagement partners matter? An analysis of audit partner reporting decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32, 1443–1478. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silane, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). Law and finance (No. w5661). National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w5661
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Richardson, S. A. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 625–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.t01-1-00143.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C. (2010). Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40, 229–256. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Qi, B., Tian, G., & Zhang, G. (2016). The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review. doi: 10.2308/accr-51407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livatino, M., Pecchiari, N., & Pogliani, G. (2011). Auditing (2nd ed.). Milano: Egea.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, N. B. (1985). The social software of accounting and information systems. New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Maister, D. H. (1982). Balancing the professional service firm. Sloan Management Review, 24(1), 15–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mannix, E., & Neale, M. A. (2005). What differences make a difference? The promise and reality of diverse teams in organizations. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 6, 31–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marra, A., Mazzola, P., & Prencipe, A. (2011). Board monitoring and earnings management pre-and post-iFRS. The International Journal of Accounting, 46, 205–230. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2011.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Mautz, R. K., & Sharaf, H. A. (1961). The philosophy of auditing, American accounting association monograph No. 6. Sarasota, FL: American Accounting Association.
   Google Scholar
• Melis, A. (2005). Corporate governance failures: To what extent is Parmalat a particularly Italian case? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 478–488. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. N., Myers, L. A., & Omer, T. C. (2003). Exploring the term of the auditor–client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review, 78, 779–799. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., & Tan, H. T. (2005). Judgment and decision making research in auditing: A task, person, and interpersonal interaction perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Supplement1), 41–71. doi: 10.2308/aud.2005.24.Supplement.41
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, J., Karjalainen, J., Niskanen, M., & Karjalainen, J. (2011). Auditor gender and corporate earnings management behavior in private Finnish firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26, 778–793. doi: 10.1108/02686901111171448
   Google Scholar
• Nolder, C., & Riley, T. J. (2014). Effects of differences in national culture on auditors’ judgments and decisions: A literature review of cross-cultural auditing studies from a judgment and decision making perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(2), 141–164. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, E., & Johnson, E. (2001). The effects of auditor gender and task complexity on information processing efficiency. International Journal of Auditing, 5, 91–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2001.00328.x
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, T. B., Simunic, D. A., & Stein, M. T. (1994). The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 241–261. doi: 10.2307/2491284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T., & Pierce, B. J. (1996). The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15, 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachucki, M. A., & Breiger, R. L. (2010). Cultural holes: Beyond relationality in social networks and cultures. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 205–224. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCAOB. (2013). Release No. 2013-009, December 4, 2013. Retrieved September 22, 2016, from http://pcaobus.org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket029/PCAOB20Release20No20202013-00920-20Transparency.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Peecher, M. E., Piercey, M. D., Rich, J. S., & Tubbs, R. M. (2010). The effects of a supervisor’s active intervention in subordinates’ judgments, directional goals, and perceived technical knowledge advantage on audit team judgments. The Accounting Review, 85, 1763–1786. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2004). Cost–quality conflict in audit firms: An empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13, 415–441. doi: 10.1080/0963818042000216794
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, B., & Sweeney, B. (2005). Management control in audit firms – Partners’ perspectives. Management Accounting Research, 16, 340–370. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2005.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Rich, J. S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). Multi-auditor judgment/decision making research: A decade later. Journal of Accounting Literature, 16, 86–126.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzotti, D., & Greco, A. M. (2013). Determinants of board of statutory auditor and internal control committee diligence: A comparison between audit committee and the corresponding Italian committees. The International Journal of Accounting, 48, 84–110. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2013.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Schelleman, C., & Knechel, R. (2010). Short-term accruals and the pricing and production of audit services. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 221–250. doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shockley, R. A. (1981). Perceptions of auditors’ independence: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 56, 785–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spamann, H. (2010). The ‘antidirector rights index’ revisited. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 467–486. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhp067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinidhi, B. N., & Gul, F. A. (2007). The differential effects of auditors’ non-audit and audit fees on accrual quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24, 595–629. doi: 10.1506/ARJ4-20P3-201K-3752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., Platow, M. J., Fransen, K., Yang, J., … Boen, F. (2014). Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the identity leadership inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 1001–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., & Svanström, T. (2014). Auditor-in-charge characteristics and going-concern reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31, 531–550. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, J. T., & Roberts, R. W. (1997). Cognitive moral development and auditor independence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 337–352. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotman, K. T., Bauer, T. D., & Humphreys, K. A. (2015). Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 47, 56–72. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., & Schippers, M. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annal Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velucchi, M. (2009). Regime switching: Italian financial market over a century. Statistical Methods and Applications, 18, 67–86. doi: 10.1007/s10260-007-0075-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2010). Bacon: An effective way to detect outliers in multivariate data using stata (and mata). Stata Journal, 10(3), 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingate, M. L. (1997). An examination of cultural influence on audit environments. Research in Accounting Regulation, 11 (Supplement1), 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321. doi: 10.5465/AMR.1993.3997517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W., Aggarwal, I., & Malone, T. W. (2015). Collective intelligence and group performance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 420–424. doi: 10.1177/0963721415599543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolley, A. W., Chabris, C. F., Pentland, A., Hashmi, N., & Malone, T. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686–688. doi: 10.1126/science.1193147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysocki, P. D. (2004). Discussion of ultimate ownership, income management, and legal and extra-legal institutions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42, 463–474. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00145.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerni, M. (2012). Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 312–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01098.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar