The Impact of Audit Committee Financial Expertise on Management Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) Tone

References

• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2004). Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 69–87. doi: 10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C. S., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2010). Chief executive officer equity incentives and accounting irregularities. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(2), 225–271. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C., & Ege, M. (2014). Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 208–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M. J., & Mauldin, E. G. (2014). Who's really in charge? Audit committee versus CFO power and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2057–2085. doi: 10.2308/accr-50834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braiotta Jr, L., Gazzaway, R. T., Colson, R., & Ramamoorti, S. (2010). The audit committee handbook. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D., Lu, H. M., & Steele, L. B. (2014). The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(1), 396–455. doi: 10.1007/s11142-013-9258-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Ye, Z. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1–31. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-10112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. L. (2003). Audit committee independence and disclosure: Choice for financially distressed firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(4), 289–299. doi: 10.1111/1467-8683.00327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. R., Gaynor, L. M., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2007). Auditor communications with the audit committee and the board of directors: Policy recommendations and opportunities for future research. Accounting Horizons, 21(2), 165–187. doi: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.165
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. R., Hoitash, U., Krishnamoorthy, G., & Wright, A. M. (2014). The effect of audit committee industry expertise on monitoring the financial reporting process. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 243–273. doi: 10.2308/accr-50585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. K., Piger, J. M., & Sedor, L. M. (2012). Beyond the numbers: Measuring the information content of earnings press release language. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 845–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01130.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. K., & Tama-Sweet, I. (2012). Managers’ use of language across alternative disclosure outlets: Earnings press releases versus MD&A. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(3), 804–837. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Franco, G., Hope, O., Vyas, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Analyst report readability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), 76–104. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, L. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: The role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(s-1), 35–59. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Erkens, D. H., & Zhang, J. (2017). Do client characteristics really drive the Big N audit quality effect? New evidence from propensity score matching. Management Science, 63(11), 3628–3649. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2016.2528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., Hann, R. N., & Hu, X. (2005). Does the market value financial expertise on audit committees of boards of directors? Journal of Accounting Research, 43(2), 153–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00166.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R., Govindaraj, S., Livnat, J., & Segal, B. (2010). Management’s tone change, post earnings announcement drift and accruals. Review of Accounting Studies, 15(4), 915–953. doi: 10.1007/s11142-009-9111-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2007). Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 306–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). (2001). Improving business reporting: Insights into enhancing voluntary disclosures. Steering Committee. Business Reporting Research Project. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
   Google Scholar
• Glendening, M., Mauldin, E., & Shaw, K. W. (2014). Management, auditor, and audit committee influence on MD&A: Evidence from critical accounting estimate quantitative sensitivity disclosures (Working paper). University of Missouri.
   Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (1995). Basic econometrics (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hoitash, U., Hoitash, R., & Bedard, J. C. (2009). Corporate governance and internal control over financial reporting: A comparison of regulatory regimes. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 839–867. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., Teoh, S. H., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Tone management. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 1083–1113. doi: 10.2308/accr-50684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). (2010). Management commentary: A framework for presentation. IFRS Foundation Publications. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• Jeanjean, T., & Stolowy, H. (2009). Determinants of board members’ financial expertise – Empirical evidence from France. The International Journal of Accounting, 44(4), 378–402. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2009.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Keinath, A. K., & Walo, J. C. (2008). Audit committee responsibilities disclosed since Sarbanes-Oxley. The CPA Journal, 78(6), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I., & Skinner, D. J. (2012). Measuring securities litigation risk. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(1–2), 290–310. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., Nielsen, R., Coberley, C., Pope, J., & Wells, A. (2011). Comparative effectiveness of matching methods for causal inference. (Working paper). Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–858. doi: 10.1506/car.25.3.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., & Lee, J. E. (2009). Audit committee financial expertise, litigation risk, and corporate governance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 241–261. doi: 10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Zakolyukina, A. A. (2012). Detecting deceptive discussions in conference calls. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 495–540. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 221–247. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2010). The information content of forward-looking statements in corporate filings – A naïve Bayesian machine learning approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(5), 1049–1102. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisic, L. L., Neal, T. L., Zhang, I. X., & Zhang, Y. (2016). CEO power, internal control quality, and audit committee effectiveness in substance versus in form. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(3), 1199–1237. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2016). Textual analysis in accounting and finance: A survey. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(4), 1187–1230. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayew, W. J., Sethuraman, M., & Venkatachalam, M. (2015). MD&a disclosure and the firm’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1621–1651. doi: 10.2308/accr-50983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muslu, V., Radhakrishnan, S., Subramanyam, K. R., & Lim, D. (2015). Forward-looking MD&A disclosures and the information environment. Management Science, 61(5), 931–948. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, S. M., Doran, J. S., Peterson, D. R., & Bliss, B. A. (2012). Earnings conference calls and stock returns: The incremental informativeness of textual tone. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(4), 992–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2012). Auditing standard number 16 – Communications with audit committees. Release No. 2012-004. Washington, DC: PCAOB.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2002). Proposed rule: Disclosure required by sections 404, 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Release Nos. 33-8138, 34-46701. Washington, DC: SEC.
   Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2003a). Interpretation: Commission guidance regarding management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. Release Nos. 33-8350, 34-48960. Washington, DC: SEC.
   Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2003b). Disclosure required by sections 406 and 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Release Nos. 33-8177, 34-47235. Washington, DC: SEC.
   Google Scholar
• Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. (1999). CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: An empirical analysis. The Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1829–1853. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavcar, L. R. (1998). Make the MD&A more readable. The CPA Journal, 68(1), 10.
   Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. C. (2007). Giving content to investor sentiment: The role of media in the stock market. The Journal of Finance, 62(3), 1139–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tetlock, P. C., Saar-Tsechansky, M., & Macskassy, S. (2008). More than words: Quantifying language to measure firms’ fundamentals. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1437–1467. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. W., & Zarowin, P. A. (2006). Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 251–270. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar