Experience of Audit Committee Members and Audit Quality

References

• Abbott, L. J., & Parker, S. (2000). Auditor selection and audit committee characteristics. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 47–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G., & Raghunandan, K. (2003a). The association between audit committee characteristics and audit fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 17–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G., & Raghunandan, K. (2003b). An empirical investigation of audit fees, nonaudit fees and audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., McNamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting & Finance, 52, 971–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasov, V., & Black, B. (2016). Shock-based causal inference in corporate finance and accounting research. Critical Finance Review, 5, 207–304.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Company Directors. (2018). How busy is too busy? Company Director, 34(8), 64–67.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, M., Mauldin, J., & Elaine, G. (2014). Who’s really in charge? Audit committee versus CEO power and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 89(6), 2057–2085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, J., Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(2), 13–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankley, A. I., Hurtt, D. N., & MacGregor, J. E. (2012). Abnormal audit fees and restatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(1), 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boo, A., & Sharma, D. (2008). Effect of regulatory oversight on the association between internal governance characteristics and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 48(1), 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Business Round Table. (2003). Executive compensation: Principles and commentary. Washington, DC, USA. Retrieved from http://businessroundtable.org/resources/executive-compensation
   Google Scholar
• Cahan, S. F., Jeter, D. C., & Naiker, V. (2011). Are all industry specialist auditors the same? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 191–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. F., Hermanson, D. R., & Ye, Z. (2011). Corporate governance research in accounting and auditing: Insights, practice implications, and future research directions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(3), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., Neal, T. L., & Riley, R. A. (2002). Board characteristics and audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 19(3), 365–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J. V., & Neal, T. (2003, January). Audit committee characteristics and auditor dismissals following new going-concern reports. The Accounting Review, 78, 95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal, J. D. (2001). The strategic network content of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 639–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M. Y., Liu, G., & Sun, J. (2013). Independent audit committee members’ board tenure and audit fees. Accounting & Finance, 53, 1129–1147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., & Wong-Boren, A. (1987). Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. The Accounting Review, 62(3), 533–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao, M., Huang, H. W., & Zhu, J. (2013). The effects of audit committee members’ age and additional directorships on the cost of equity capital in the USA. European Accounting Review, 22(3), 607–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart, E. (2011). UK investors’ perceptions of auditor independence. The British Accounting Review, 43, 173–185.
   Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M. L., & Francis, J. R. (2005). Audit research after Sarbanes-Oxley. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Supplement), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 275–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeZoort, F. T. (1998). An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members’ oversight judgments. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38–75.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are busy boards effective monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow, I., Ormazabal, G., & Taylor, D. (2010). Correcting for cross-sectional and time-series dependence in accounting research. The Accounting Review, 85(2), 483–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S., & Nowland, J. (2013). Is prior director experience valuable? Accounting & Finance, 53, 643–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, I. C., & Shimizu, K. (2004). Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 775–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, I., Hoi, C. K.,, Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2014). Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: The effect of corporate tax avoidance on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Financial Economics, 113(1), 109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, D. C., Knechel, W. R., & Wong, N. (2006). Audit fees: A meta-analysis of the effect of supply and demand attributes. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(1), 141–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesham, M. (2003). Management attitudes and perceptions of older employees in hospitality management. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 15(7), 393–401.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., Angelmar, R., & Mehra, A. (2000). Top management team diversity and firm performance: Examining the role of cognitions. Organization Science, 11(1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., & Willekens, M. (2006). The role of risk management and governance in determining audit demand. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9/10), 1344–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. [Working Paper]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, G. V., & Visvanathan, G. (2009). Do auditors price audit committee’s expertise? The case of accounting vs. nonaccounting financial experts. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 24(1), 115–144.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committee quality and internal control: An empirical analysis. The Accounting Review, 80(2), 649–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langendijk, H. (1997). The market for audit services in the Netherlands. European Accounting Review, 6(2), 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Larcker, D. F., & Richardson, S. (2004). Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices and corporate governance. Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), 625–658.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. Y., & Mande, V. (2005). The relationship of audit committee characteristics with endogenously determined audit and non-audit fees. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics, 44(3/4), 93–111.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer, 48, 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Mahadeo, D., Soobaroyen, T., & Hanuman, V. O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: Uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew, B. W., & Wilkins, M. S. (2003). Audit firm industry specialization as a differentiation strategy: Evidence from fees charged to firms going public. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 33–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Corporate Directors and the Center for Board Leadership. (2000). Report of the NACD Blue Ribbon Commission on Audit Committees: A Practical Guide. Washington, DC: National Association of Corporate Directors.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, N. (2000). The impact of board composiiton and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies. The British Accounting Review, 32, 397–414.
   Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z. V. (1986). Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palsson, A. M. (1996). Does the degree of risk aversion vary with household characteristics? Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(6), 771–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, B., & Thornton, D. B. (2008). Meta-analysis and the accounting literature: The case of audit committee independence and financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 17(2), 305–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Congress Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (2002). Public Law 107-2004. H.R. 3763. Washington DC: US Government Publishing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Serfling, M. A. (2014). CEO age and the riskiness of corporate policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25, 251–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, D. S., & Iselin, E. R. (2012). The association between audit committee multiple-directorships, tenure and financial misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(3), 149–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. (2011). Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends. Journal of Corporate Finance, 17, 1001–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunic, D. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, M., Donald, K., Najman, J., & Skerman, H. (1996). Attitudes of employees and employers towards older workers in a climate of anti-discrimination. Australian Journal on Ageing, 15(4), 154–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultana, N., & Van der Zahn, J.-L. W. M. (2015). Earnings conservatism and audit committee financial expertise. Accounting & Finance, 55(1), 279–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turpin, R. A. (1995). Audit fees - what research tells us. CPA Journal, 12(1), 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Vafeas, N., & Theodorou, E. (1998). The relationship between board structure and firm performance in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 30(4), 383–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A., Sonnenfeld, J., & Kimberley, J. (1995). In search of a kingdom: Determinants of subsequent career outcomes for chief executives who are fired. Human Resource Management, 34(1), 117–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., & Krishnan, J. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Zhou, J., & Zhou, N. (2007). Audit committee quality, auditor independence, and internal control weaknesses. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 26(3), 300–327.
   Google Scholar