Stakeholders versus Firm Communication in Social Media: The Case of Twitter and Corporate Social Responsibility Information

References

• Baik, B., Cao, Q., Choi, S., & Kim, J.-M. (2016). Local Twitter activity and stock returns (Working Paper). Retrieved from SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2783670
   Google Scholar
• Bartov, E., Faurel, L., & Mohanram, P. (2018). Can Twitter help predict firm-level earnings and stock returns? The Accounting Review, 93(3), 25–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A., Sawy, O., El, A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 417–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankespoor, E., Miller, G. S., & White, H. D. (2014). The role of dissemination in market liquidity: Evidence from firmś use of Twitter. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 79–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(12), 1325–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2006). Communication of corporate social responsibility by Portuguese banks: A legitimacy theory perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 11(3), 232–248.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, L., & Logsdon, J. M. (1996). How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Planning, 29(4), 495–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cade, N. L. (2018). Corporate social media: How two-way disclosure channels influence investors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68–69(5), 63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Capriotti, P., & Moreno, A. (2007). Corporate citizenship and public relations: The importance and interactivity of social responsibility issues on corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. (2012). 2948 Barómetro de Junio de 2012. Retrieved from http://www.cis.es/cis/opencm/ES/1_encuestas/estudios/ver.jsp?estudio=12884
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, P. K., & Philipich, K. L. (2002). Shredded reputation: The cost of audit failure. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(4), 1221–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., De, P., Hu, Y., & Hwang, B. (2014). Wisdom of crowds: The value of stock opinions transmitted through social media. Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1367–1403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. H., Roberts, R. W., & Patten, D. M. (2010). The language of US corporate environmental disclosure. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(4), 431–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W., & Wong-Boren, A. (1987). Voluntary financial disclosure by Mexican corporations. The Accounting Review, 62(3), 533–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Circular 4/2004, of 22 December, of Bank of Spain. (BOE of 30 December 2004 ).
   Google Scholar
• Circular 4/2017, of 27 November, of Bank of Spain. (BOE of 6 December 2017 ).
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson Center for Business Ethics. (2002). Principles of stakeholder management. Toronto: University of Toronto. Reproduced in 2002, Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2): 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. M., & Owen, D. L. (2007). Corporate social reporting and stakeholder accountability: The missing link. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7–8), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & Gill de Zuñiga, H. (2010). Who interacts on the web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A., Richardson, V., & Schmardebeck, R. (2016). Social media attention and the pricing of earnings news. In G. Mitra & X. Yu (Eds.), Handbook of sentiment analysis in finance (pp. 212–232). London: OptiRisk Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C. (2006). Legitimacy theory. In Z. Hogue (Ed.), Methodological issues in accounting research: Theories and methods (pp. 161–182). London: Spiramus Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C., & Samkin, G. (2009). New Zealand financial accounting. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2006). The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domench, P. A. (2003). La divulgación de la información social y medioambiental de la gran empresa española en el período 1994–1998: Situación actual y perspectivas. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 32(117), 571–601.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyckman, T. R., & Zeff, S. A. (2019). Important issues in statistical testing and recommended improvements in accounting research. Econometrics, 7, 18–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurosif. (2012). European SRI study 2012. Retrieved from http://www.eurosif.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/eurosif-sri-study_low-res-v1.1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholder: Theory and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). (2013). G4 sustainability reporting guidelines. Amsterdam: GRI.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, L. M., & Chalmeta, R. (2011). Corporate responsibility in US corporate websites: A pilot study. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 93–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Carrasco, P., Guillamon-Saorín, E., & Garcia Osma, B. (2016). The illusion of CSR: Drawing the line between core and supplementary CSR. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(1), 125–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Carrasco, P., & Michelon, G. (2017). The power of stakeholders’ voice: The effects of social media activism on stock markets. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(6), 855–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. (2000). Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing, 4(3), 247–268.
   Google Scholar
• Hawelka, B., Sitko, I., Beinat, E., Sobolevsky, S., Kazakopoulos, P., & Ratti, C. (2014). Geo-located Twitter as proxy for global mobility patterns. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41(3), 260–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highhouse, S., Brooks, M. E., & Gregarus, G. (2009). An organizational impression management perspective on the formation of corporate reputations. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1481–1493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, D. (2011). Bull, bear, and bird? Social media comes to investor relations. ABA Banking Journal. Retrieved from https://www.bankingexchange.com/community-banking/item/2295-bull-bear-and-bird-social-media-and-investor-relations
   Google Scholar
• Hossain, M., & Reaz, M. (2007). The determinants and characteristics of voluntary disclosure by Indian banking companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 14(5), 274–288.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2014). Shattered dreams: Impact of Spain housing crisis on vulnerable groups. New York. Retrieved from http://www.hrw.org/reports/2014/05/28/shattered-dreams
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeacle, I., & Carter, C. (2011). In TripAdvisor we trust: Rankings, calculative regimes and abstract systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(4), 293–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the mining industry: Conflicts and constructs. Corporate Social Responsibility & Environmental Management, 11(1), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2009). A ‘business opportunity’ model of corporate social responsibility for small-and medium-sized enterprises. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18(1), 21–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P., & Schoen, H. (2012). Why the pirate party won the German election of 2009 or the trouble with predictions: A response to Tumasjan, A. et al. “Predicting elections with twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment”. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 229–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, R., & Kellner, D. (2004). New media and internet activism: From the ‘battle of Seattle’ to blogging. New Media and Society, 6(1), 87–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, G. C., Fichman, R. G., Gallaugher, J., & Glaser, J. (2009). Community relations 2.0. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauser, S. (2013, November 15). Euro crisis reprieve. End to bailout programs signals recovery. The Spiegel. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/end-of-bailout-programs-in-spain-and-ireland-signals-euro-crisis-recovery-a-933650.html
   Google Scholar
• Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence vs. integrity-based violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. H., Ferrin, D. L., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 104–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, B. G., & Soule, S. A. (2007). Social movements as extra-institutional entrepreneurs: The effect of protests on stock price returns. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 413–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 111(24), 8788–8790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, L. F., Hutton, A. P., & Shu, S. (2015). The role of social media in the capital market: Evidence from consumer product recalls. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 367–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewicki, R. J., & Wiethoff, C. (2000). Trust, Trust Development, and Trust Repair. In M. Deutsch, & P.T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 86–107). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, L. M. (2017, July 12). Congressional hearing of the Governor of the Banco de España before the Commission investigating the financial crisis in Spain and the financial assistance programme. Banco de España. Retrieved from https://www.bde.es/f/webbde/GAP/Secciones/SalaPrensa/IntervencionesPublicas/Gobernador/Arc/Fic/linde120717en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahon, J. (2002). Corporate reputation: A research agenda using strategy and stakeholder literature. Business and Society, 41(4), 415–445.
   Google Scholar
• Manetti, G. (2011). The quality of stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence and critical points. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(2), 110–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlister, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (2002). The role of strategic philanthropy in marketing strategy. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 689–705.
   Google Scholar
• Meek, G. K., Roberts, C. B., & Gray, S. J. (1995). Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), 555–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. H. (2017). A theoretical framework of external accounting communication: Research perspectives, traditions and theories. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(2), 433–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Romi, A. M. (2019). Creating legitimacy for sustainability assurance practices: Evidence from sustainability restatements. European Accounting Review, 28(2), 395–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, S., Hammond, K., & Friedman, A. L. (2002). ACCA research report no. 77: Social and environmental reporting and ethical investment. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J., & Patten, D. (2002). Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 372–405.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: On the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(2), 171–182.
   Google Scholar
• Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, K. B., & Vogel, C. M. (1997). Using a hierarchy-of-effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus nonfinancial impacts. Journal of Business Research, 38(2), 141–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. (2012). Spain is digital. Trends and consumption online in Spain. The Nielsen Company.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, C. E. (1998). El gasto en educación de las cajas de ahorros. Papeles de Economía Española, 74–75, 234–258.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donovan, G. (2002). Environmental disclosures in the annual report: Extending the applicability and predictive power of legitimacy theory. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2005). The construction of a social account: A case study in an overseas aid agency. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(3), 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero-Iglesias, M., Royo, S., & Steinberg, F. (2016). The Spanish financial crisis: Lessons for the European Banking Union. Informe Elcano. March. Elcano Royal Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D., Swift, T., & Hunt, K. (2001). Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum, 25(3), 264–282.
   Google Scholar
• Patten, D. M. (1992a). Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 471–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patten, D. M. (1992b). Exposure, legitimacy, and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10(4), 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, E. R. (2006). Making corporate social responsibility (CSR) operable: How companies translate stakeholder dialogue into practice. Business and Society Review, 111(2), 137–163.
   Google Scholar
• Peloza, J. (2006). Using corporate social responsibility as insurance for financial performance. California Management Review, 48(2), 52–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez, A., Lopez-Gutierrez, C., García-De los Salmones, M. D. M., & San-Martin, P. (2020). Stakeholder salience, positive CSR news and the market value of banks. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, forthcoming. doi:10.1080/02102412.2019.1681718
   Google Scholar
• Petrovits, C. M. (2006). Corporate-sponsored foundations and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 41(3), 335–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruf, B. M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R. M., Janney, J. J., & Paul, K. (2001). An empirical investigation of the relationship between change in corporate social performance and financial performance: A stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(2), 143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2004). Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance. Business and Society, 43(2), 135–161.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., Tumasjan, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2014). News or noise? Using Twitter to identify and understand company-specific news flow. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 41(7-8), 791–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, I., & Bebbington, J. (2005). Social and environmental reporting in the UK: A pedagogic evaluation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(5), 507–533.
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2010). Predicting elections with Twitter: What 140 characters reveal about political sentiment. Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (pp. 178–185). Washington, DC (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sandner, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. (2012). Where there is a sea there are pirates: Response to Jungherr, Jürgens, and Schoen. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 235–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & Bennett, M. (2004). Increased stakeholder dialogue and the internet: Towards greater corporate accountability or reinforcing capitalist hegemony? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(7), 685–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unerman, J., & Chapman, C. (2014). Academic contributions to enhancing accounting for sustainable development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39(6), 385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, S. C., & Fernández, F. R. (1998). Tendencias recientes en la obra social de las cajas de ahorros españolas. Papeles de Economía Española, 74, 226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Vasi, I. B., & King, B. G. (2012). Social movements, risk perceptions, and economic outcomes: The effect of primary and secondary stakeholder activism on firms’ perceived environmental risk and financial performance. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 573–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verrecchia, R. E. (2001). Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1), 97–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Choi, J., & Li, J. (2008). Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organization Science, 19(1), 143–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward, D., Edwards, P., & Birkin, F. (2001). Some evidence on executives’ views of corporate social responsibility. British Accounting Review, 33(3), 357–397.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G. (2013). The power of the internet in China: Citizen activism online. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. H., & Liu, S. (2017). Accounting narratives and impression management on social media. Accounting and Business Research, 47(6), 673–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar