When Do Investors Value Key Audit Matters?

References

• Alexander, R. M. (2003). The effects of source credibility on tax professional judgment in consulting engagements. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 25(s-1), 33–49. doi: 10.2308/jata.2003.25.s-1.33
   Google Scholar
• Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2012). Investors’, auditors’, and lenders’ understanding of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 26(2), 193–217. doi: 10.2308/acch-50138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA). (2019). Statistics: Quarterly superannuation performance June 2019. Retrieved from https://www.apra.gov.au/sites/default/files/quarterly_superannuation_performance_statistics_june_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Stock Exchange (ASX). (2017). ASX Australian investor study 2017. Retrieved from https://www.asx.com.au/education/2017-asx-investor-study.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bannister, B. D. (1986). Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: Interactive effects on recipient responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 203–210. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, P. R. (1994). Commercial lenders’ use of accounting information in interaction with source credibility. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10(2), 557–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00406.x
   Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, P. R. (2001). The effects of judgments of new clients’ integrity upon risk judgments, audit evidence, and fees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2), 85–99. doi: 10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Coram, P., Espahbodi, R., & Mock, T. J. (2016). Does recent academic research support changes to audit reporting standards? Accounting Horizons, 30(2), 255–275. doi: 10.2308/acch-51397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Gonthier-Besacier, N., & Schatt, A. (2019). Consequences of expanded audit reports: Evidence from the justifications of assessments in France. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38(3), 23–45. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-52339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentley, J. W., Lambert, T. A., & Wang, E. Y. (2018). The effect of increased audit disclosure on managerial decision making: Evidence from disclosing critical audit matters. Working paper. University of Massachusetts Amherst and Lehigh University. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3000978
   Google Scholar
• Bills, K. L., Cunningham, L. M., & Myers, L. A. (2016). Small audit firm membership in associations, networks, and alliances: Implications for audit quality and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 91(3), 767–792. doi: 10.2308/accr-51228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48–74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boolaky, P. K., & Quick, R. (2016). Bank directors’ perceptions of expanded auditor’s reports. International Journal of Auditing, 20(2), 158–174. doi: 10.1111/ijau.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, M. E., & Almulla, M. (2019). Auditor, client, and investor consequences of the enhanced auditor’s report. Working paper. Massey University and BDO Auckland. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3165267
   Google Scholar
• Brasel, K., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., & Reffett, A. (2016). Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91(5), 1345–1362. doi: 10.2308/accr-51380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. J. (2014). Advantageous comparison and rationalization of earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4), 849–876. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckless, F. A., & Ravenscroft, S. P. (1990). Contrast coding: A refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis. The Accounting Review, 65(4), 933–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, B. T., & Trinkle, B. S. (2017). Nonprofessional investors’ reactions to the PCAOB’s proposed changes to the standard audit report. Working Paper. Clemson University and Mississippi State University. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2930375
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, M., Green, W., & Ko, J. (2015). The impact of strategic relevance and assurance of sustainability indicators on investors’ decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), 131–162. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., & Wolfe, C. J. (2014). Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(4), 71–93. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clor-Proell, S. M., & Maines, L. A. (2014). The impact of recognition versus disclosure on financial information: A preparer's perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(3), 671–701. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. Auflage). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Craswell, A. T., Francis, J. R., & Taylor, S. L. (1995). Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 297–322. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00403-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dart, E. (2011). UK investors’ perceptions of auditor independence. The British Accounting Review, 43(3), 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2011.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. I., & Stevens, D. E. (2013). Can a code of ethics improve manager behaviour and investor confidence? An experimental study. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 51–74. doi: 10.2308/accr-50272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeZoort, F. T., Houston, R. W., & Hermanson, D. R. (2003). Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: A source credibility perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 189–205. doi: 10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilla, W. N., Janvrin, D. J., & Jeffrey, C. (2013). The impact of graphical displays of pro forma earnings information on professional and nonprofessional investors’ earnings judgments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 25(1), 37–60. doi: 10.2308/bria-50289
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analysis of the effect of communicator characteristics on opinion change: The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(1), 136–144. doi: 10.1037/h0076850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, W. B. (2006). Are investors influenced by pro forma emphasis and reconciliations in earnings announcements? The Accounting Review, 81(1), 113–133. doi: 10.2308/accr.2006.81.1.113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W. B., Grant, S. M., & Rennekamp, K. M. (2017). How disclosure features of corporate social responsibility reports interact with investor numeracy to influence investor judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(3), 1596–1621. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W. B., Hodge, F. D., Kennedy, J. J., & Pronk, M. (2007). Are M.B.A. students a good proxy for nonprofessional investors? The Accounting Review, 82(1), 139–168. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshleman, J. D., & Guo, P. (2014). Abnormal audit fees and audit quality: The importance of considering managerial incentives in tests of earnings management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(1), 117–138. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2014). Regulation of the European Parliament and of the council on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public-interest entities and repealing commission decision 2005/909/EU. Brussels: European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32014R0537
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2014). Regulation (EU) No 537/2014 of the European parliament and of the council of 16 April 2014 on specific requirements regarding statutory audit of public interest entities. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, A., Francis, J. R., & Stokes, D. J. (2003). The effects of firm-wide and office-level industry expertise on audit pricing. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 429–448. doi: 10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2013). International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700: The independent auditor’s report on financial statements. London: Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/501de004-b616-43c3-8d65-aeaebde19f8d/ISA-700-(UK-and-Ireland)-700-(Revised)-Independent-auditors-report-June-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC). (2015). Extended auditor’s reports: A review of experience in the first Year. London: Financial Reporting Council. Retrieved from https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/561627cc-facb-431b-beda-ead81948604e/Extended-Auditor-Reports-March-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, A., & Berthelot, S. (2012). MD&a risk disclosures and nonprofessional investors’ perceptions and investment decisions. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 15, 1–28. doi: 10.1108/S1475-1488(2012)0000015005
   Google Scholar
• Gay, N., & Ng, T. (2015). Effects of key audit matter standard and audit committee proactiveness on auditors' communication to the audit committee and decisions on client's accounting estimates. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Audit Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., & Ozlanski, M. E. (2016). The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1629–1646. doi: 10.2308/accr-51382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenmos, R. D., Piercey, M. D., & Agoglia, C. P. (2018). Custom contrast testing: Current trends and a new approach. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 223–244. doi: 10.2308/accr-52005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K. W., & Vulcheva, M. (2018). Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 23(4), 1543–1587. doi: 10.1007/s11142-018-9464-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, N., & He, W. (2016). Investor mood and the determinants of stock prices: An experimental analysis. Accounting & Finance, 56(2), 445–478. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, D. E., Koonce, L., & Miller, J. (1999). The joint effect of management’s prior forecast accuracy and the form of its financial forecasts on investor judgment. Journal of Accounting Research, 37, 101–124. doi: 10.2307/2491347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(Winter), 635–650. doi: 10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2011). Enhancing the value of auditor reporting: Exploring options for change (Consultation Paper). New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/enhancing-value-auditor-reporting-exploring-options-change
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2012). Improving the auditor’s report (Invitation to Comment). New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/publications/files/Auditor_Reporting_Invitation_to_Comment-final_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2013). Reporting on audited financial statements: Proposed new and revised International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) (Exposure Draft). New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/reporting-audited-financial-statements-proposed-new-and-revised-international
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2015a). Auditor reporting–Key audit matters. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/auditor-reporting-key-audit-matters
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2015b). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700 (Revised): Forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/international-standard-auditing-isa-700-revised-forming-opinion-and-reporting
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2015c). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701: Communicating key audit matters in the independent auditor's report. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/international-standard-auditing-isa-701-new-communicating-key-audit-matters-i
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). (2015d). At a glance: New and revised auditor reporting standards and related conforming amendments. New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/uploads/IAASB/Audit Reporting-At a Glance-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, S. J., Rimkus, D., Schmidt, J. J., & Valentine, K. (2019). The forewarning effects of critical audit matter disclosures involving measurement uncertainty. Contemporary Accounting Research. in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. E., Samuels, J. A., & Cohen, J. (2015). An examination of the effect of CEO social ties and CEO reputation on nonprofessional investors’ say-on-pay judgments. Journal of Business Ethics, 126(1), 103–117. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1995-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation risk and the financial reporting credibility of Big 4 versus Non-big 4 audits: Evidence from Anglo-American countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473–495. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Park, M. S. (2006). Auditor changes and the pricing of seasoned equity offers. Accounting Horizons, 20(4), 333–349. doi: 10.2308/acch.2006.20.4.333
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Krishnan, G. V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L. B., & Velury, U. K. (2013). Audit quality: Insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(Supplement), 385–421. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R., Naiker, V., & Pacheco, G. (2007). Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 26(1), 19–45. doi: 10.2308/aud.2007.26.1.19
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, A., Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S., & Theis, J. (2016). The effect of key audit matters on the auditor’s report’s communicative value: Experimental evidence from investment professionals and non-professional investors. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2838162
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C. S., Schmidt, J. J., & Thompson, A. (2019). Are expanded audit reports informative to investors? Evidence from the U.K. Working Paper. University of Southern California, University of Texas at Austin, and University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2619785
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, M. (2004). How do investors assess the credibility of management disclosures? Accounting Horizons, 18(3), 185–196. doi: 10.2308/acch.2004.18.3.185
   Google Scholar
• Mock, T. J., Bédard, J., Coram, P. J., Davis, S. M., Espahbodi, R., & Warne, R. C. (2013). The audit reporting model: Current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 323–351. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-50294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, T., Turner, J., Gray, G., & Coram, P. (2009). The unqualified auditor’s report: A study of user perceptions, effects on user decisions and decision processes, and directions for future research. A Report to the Auditing Standards Board and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (June). New York, NY: International Federation of Accountants. Retrieved from https://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/Study__1_ASB_Summary_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, D. R., & Smith, D. B. (1983). Auditor credibility and auditor changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2), 534–544. doi: 10.2307/2490789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39–52. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, T., & Trompeter, G. (1994). Competition in the market for audit services: The effect of supplier concentration on audit fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(1), 115–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00439.x
   Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2016). Proposed auditing standards – The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB standards (Release No. 2016-003). Washington, DC: PCAOB. Retrieved from https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/Release-2016-003-ARM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raman, K. K., & Wilson, E. R. (1994). Governmental audit procurement practices and seasoned bond prices. The Accounting Review, 69(4), 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratzinger-Sakel, N. V. S., & Theis, J. (2019). Does considering key audit matters affect auditor judgment performance? Corporate Ownership & Control, 17(1), 196–210. doi: 10.22495/cocv17i1siart4
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L. C., Carcello, J. V., Li, C., & Neal, T. L. (2019). Impact of auditor report changes on financial reporting quality and audit costs: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1501–1539. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, E. Y., & Fiss, P. C. (2014). Framing controversial actions: Regulatory focus, source credibility, and stock market reaction to poison pill adoption. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1734–1758. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccardi, W. N., Rama, D. V., & Raghunandan, K. (2018). Regulatory quality and global specialist auditor fee premiums. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 191–210. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieh, S., & Danielson, D. (2007). Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 307–364. doi: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). ‘Some things you learn aren’t so’: Cohen’s paradox, Asch’s paradigm, and the interpretation of interaction. Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf, D. L. (2006). Investors’ attitudes toward source credibility. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(1), 18–33. doi: 10.1108/02686900710715620
   Google Scholar
• Simnett, R., & Huggins, A. (2014). Enhancing the auditor’s report: To what extent is there support for the IAASB’s proposed changes? Accounting Horizons, 28(4), 719–747. doi: 10.2308/acch-50791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois, L.-P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor’s report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 141–162. doi: 10.2308/acch-52047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, H. T., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2014). When the use of positive language backfires: The joint effect of tone, readability and investor sophistication on earnings judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 273–302. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teoh, S. H., & Wong, T. J. (1993). Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review, 68(2), 346–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thayer, J. (2011). Determinants of investors’ information acquisition: Credibility and confirmation. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 1–22. doi: 10.2308/accr.00000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., Schelleman, C., Meuwissen, R., & Hofmann, I. (2012). The audit reporting debate: Seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review, 21(2), 193–215. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.687506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966). On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2(4), 325–342. doi: 10.1016/0022-1031(66)90026-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, A. L., Hillison, W., & Morecroft, S. E. (2004). Audit quality: A synthesis of theory and empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 153–193.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y., Fargher, N., & Carson, E. (2018). Benefits and costs of the enhanced auditor’s reports: Early evidence from Australia. Working Paper. ANU and UNSW.
   Google Scholar