References
- Abdolmohammadi, M., & Reinstein, A. (2015). Are there interactive effects of subordinate and client competence on audit reviewers’ judgments? Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 18, 69–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-148820150000018016
- Aghazadeh, S., & Hoang, K. (2020). How does audit firm emphasis on client relationship quality influence auditors’ inferences about and responses to potential persuasion in client communications? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 87, 38–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101175
- Aghazadeh, S., & Joe, J. R. (2020). How management confidence influences auditors’ testing. Working paper. Louisiana State University and University of Delaware.
- Agoglia, C. P., Brazel, J. F., Hatfield, R. C., & Jackson, S. B. (2010). How do audit workpaper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.27
- Agoglia, C. P., Hatfield, R. C., & Brazel, J. F. (2009). The effects of audit review format on review team judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.1.95
- Agoglia, C. P., Kida, T., & Hanno, D. M. (2003). The effects of alternative justification memos on the judgments of audit reviewees and reviewers. Journal of Accounting Research, 41(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00094
- Anderson, U., Kadous, K., & Koonce, L. (2004). The role of incentives to manage earnings and quantification in auditors’ evaluations of management-provided information. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 23(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.1.11
- Andiola, L. M., Bedard, J. C., & Hux, C. T. (2017). Writing an effective literature review in behavioral accounting. In T. Libby & L. Thorne (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to behavioral accounting research (pp. 473–485). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
- Asare, S. K., & Wright, A. M. (2008). The effect of a justification memo and hypothesis memo and hypothesis set quality on the review process. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2008.20.1.1
- Austin, A. A., & Carpenter, T. D. (2020). Game on: Engaging auditors and improving fraud detection. Working paper. University of Richmond and University of Georgia.
- Backof, A. G., Martin, R. D., & Thayer, J. M. (2020). How do look-back analyses and evidence specificity affect auditors’ planning judgments? The Accounting Review, 95(6), 51–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2016-0660
- Barr-Pulliam, D., Joe, J. R., Mason, S., & Sanderson, K. A. (2020). The auditor-valuation specialist coopetitive alliance in the fair value audit of complex financial instruments. Working Paper. University of Louisville, University of Delaware, DePaul University, and Bentley University.
- Bennett, G. B., & Hatfield, R. C. (2013). The effect of the social mismatch between staff auditors and client management on the collection of audit evidence. The Accounting Review, 88(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50286
- Bennett, G. B., & Hatfield, R. C. (2018). Staff auditors’ proclivity for computer-mediated communication with clients and its effect on skeptical behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 68, 42–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.003
- Bergner, J. M., Peffer, S. A., & Ramsay, R. J. (2016). Concession, contention, and accountability in auditor-client negotiations. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51146
- Bhaskar, L. S., Majors, T. M., & Vitalis, A. (2020). Are auditor negotiations impaired during depleting times? The importance of client interactions and individual attributes. Working paper. Indiana University, University of Southern California, and University of Waterloo.
- Bhattacharjee, S., & Brown, J. O. (2018). The impact of management alumni affiliation and persuasion tactics on auditors’ internal control judgments. The Accounting Review, 93(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51816
- Bhattacharjee, S., & Moreno, K. (2002). The impact of affective information on the professional judgments of more experienced and less experienced auditors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(4), 361–377. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.420
- Bhattacharjee, S., Moreno, K. K., & Riley, T. (2012). The interplay of interpersonal affect and source reliability on auditors’ inventory judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29(4), 1087–1108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01139.x
- Bhattacharjee, S., Moreno, K. K., & Wright, N. S. (2019). The impact of benchmark set composition on auditors’ level 3 fair value judgments. The Accounting Review, 94(6), 91–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52402
- Bowlin, K. O., Hobson, J. L., & Piercey, M. D. (2015). The effects of auditor rotation, professional skepticism, and interactions with managers on audit quality. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1363–1393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51032
- Boyle, E. S. (2019). The impact of auditors’ use of industry norms on management evaluations of audit quality. Working paper. University of Cincinnati.
- Brandon, D. M. (2010). External auditor evaluations of outsourced internal auditors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.159
- Brazel, J. F., Agoglia, C. P., & Hatfield, R. C. (2004). Electronic versus face-to-face review: The effects of alternative forms of review on auditors’ performance. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 949–966. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.949
- Brazel, J. F., Jackson, S. B., Schaefer, T. J., & Stewart, B. W. (2016). The outcome effect and professional skepticism. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1577–1599. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51448
- Brazel, J. F., Leiby, J., & Schaefer, T. R. (2020). Do rewards encourage professional skepticism? It depends. Working paper. North Carolina State University, University of Illinois, and University of Missouri – Kansas City.
- Brewster, B. E. (2016). The effect of client lies on auditor memory resistance and false memory acceptance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 33–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51461
- Brown, H. L., & Wright, A. M. (2008). Negotiation research in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2008.22.1.91
- Brown, J. O., & Bhattacharjee, S. (2020). The persistence of auditor mindsets when confronted with a management persuasion attempt. Working paper. Baylor University and Virginia Tech University.
- Brown, J. O., & Millar, M. (2020). A matter of perspective: Mitigating the outcome effect in auditor performance evaluations. Working paper. Baylor University.
- Brown, J. O., & Popova, V. K. (2016). The interplay of management incentives and audit committee communication on auditor judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51259
- Brown, T., & Fanning, K. (2019). The joint effects of internal auditors’ approach and persuasion tactics on managers’ responses to internal audit advice. The Accounting Review, 94(4), 173–188. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52295
- Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Wright, A. M. (2011). The effect of past client relationship and strength of the audit committee on auditor negotiations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 51–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10143
- Brown-Liburd, H. L., Wright, A. M., & Zamora, V. L. (2016). Managers’ strategic reporting judgments in audit negotiations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51306
- Burton, F. G., Emett, S. A., Simon, C. A., & Wood, D. A. (2012). Corporate managers’ reliance on internal auditor recommendations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 31(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10234
- Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
- Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (pp. 3–39). Erlbaum.
- Cheng, M. M., Tan, H. T., Trotman, K. T., & Tse, A. (2017). The impact of the timing of a prior year’s auditor concessions on financial officers’ judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51517
- Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Morrow.
- Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson.
- Cohen, J. R., Krishnamoorthy, G., Peytcheva, M., & Wright, A. M. (2013). How does the strength of the financial regulatory regime influence auditors’ judgments to constrain aggressive reporting in a principles-based versus rules-based accounting environment? Accounting Horizons, 27(3), 579–601. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50502
- Commerford, B. P., Dennis, S. A., Joe, J., & Wang, J. (2020). Man versus machine: Complex estimates and auditor reliance on artificial intelligence. Working paper. University of Kentucky, University of Central Florida, and University of Delaware.
- Comunale, C. L., Sexton, T. R., & Sincich, T. L. (2005). Linguistic delivery style, client credibility, and auditor judgment. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 8, 59–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1488(04)08003-2
- Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713–726. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713
- DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., & Houston, R. W. (2003a). Audit committee support for auditors: The effects of materiality justification and accounting precision. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 22(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(03)00007-3
- DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., & Houston, R. W. (2003b). Audit committee member support for proposed audit adjustments: A source credibility perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 189–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.2.189
- Dodgson, M. K., Agoglia, C. P., & Bennett, G. B. (2020). The influence of “relationship” partners on client managers’ negotiation positions. Working paper. Northeastern University and University of Massachusetts Amherst.
- Earley, C. E., Hoffman, V. B., & Joe, J. R. (2008). Reducing management’s influence on auditors’ judgments: An experimental investigation of SOX 404 assessments. The Accounting Review, 83(6), 1461–1485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1461
- Eutsler, J., Holderness, D. K., Robertson, J. C., & Curtis, M. B. (2019). Auditor skepticism and client ill will. Working paper. University of North Texas and West Virginia University.
- Eutsler, J., Norris, A. E., & Trompeter, G. M. (2018). A live simulation-based investigation: Interactions with clients and their effect on audit judgment and professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(3), 145–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51880
- Evans, J. S. B. T. (2003). In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(10), 454–459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012
- Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
- Favere-Marchesi, M. (2006). Audit review: The impact of discussion timing and familiarity. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.53
- Favere-Marchesi, M., & Emby, C. (2018). The alumni effect and professional skepticism: An experimental investigation. Accounting Horizons, 32(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51920
- Frank, M. L., & Hoffman, V. B. (2015). How audit reviewers respond to an audit preparer’s affective bias: The ironic rebound effect. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 559–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50873
- Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/209380
- Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.708
- Gibbins, M., McCracken, S. A., & Salterio, S. E. (2005). Negotiations over accounting issues: The congruency of audit partner and chief financial officer recalls. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 24(Suppl.), 171–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.s-1.171
- Gibbins, M., Salterio, S., & Webb, A. (2001). Evidence about auditor-client management negotiation concerning client’s financial reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 39(3), 535–563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00027
- Glover, S. M., Jiambalvo, J., & Kennedy, J. (2000). Analytical procedures and audit-planning decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 27–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.27
- Goodwin, J. (1999). The effects of source integrity and consistency of evidence on auditors’ judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1999.18.2.1
- Griffith, E. E. (2018). When do auditors use specialists’ work to improve problem representations of and judgments about complex estimates? The Accounting Review, 93(4), 177–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51926
- Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2016). How insights from the “new” JDM research can improve auditor judgment: Fundamental research questions and methodological advice. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51347
- Griffith, E. E., Kadous, K., & Young, D. (2020). Improving complex audit judgments: A framework and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, forthcoming.
- Griffith, E. E., Nolder, C. J., & Petty, R. E. (2018). The elaboration likelihood model: A meta-theory for synthesizing auditor judgment and decision-making research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(4), 169–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-52018
- Guiral, A., Ruiz, E., & Rodgers, W. (2011). To what extent are auditors’ attitudes toward the evidence influenced by the self-fulfilling prophecy? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2011.30.1.173
- Hamilton, E. L., & Winchel, J. (2019). Investors’ processing of financial communications: A persuasion perspective. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 31(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-52211
- Hatfield, R. C., Jackson, S. B., & Vandervelde, S. D. (2011). The effects of prior auditor involvement and client pressure on proposed audit adjustments. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 23(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-10064
- Heintz, J. A., White, G. B., & Bedard, J. C. (1999). The effect of data reliability on the influence of unaudited values in audit analytical procedures. International Journal of Auditing, 3(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00054
- Hobson, J. L., Stern, M. T., & Zimbelman, A. F. (2020). The benefit of mean auditors: The influence of social interaction and the dark triad on unjustified auditor trust. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(2), 1217–1247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12511
- Holderness, D. K. (2018). The effect of multiple auditors on deception detection in a client inquiry setting. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 30(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51909
- Howell, W. G. (2003). Power without persuasion: The politics of direct presidential action. Princeton University Press.
- Hurley, P. J. (2017). Ego depletion and auditors’ busy season. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51757
- Hurley, P. J. (2019). Ego depletion and auditors’ JDM quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 77, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.03.001
- Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149
- Jamal, K., & Tan, H. (2010). Joint effects of principles-based versus rules-based standards and auditor type in constraining financial managers’ aggressive reporting. The Accounting Review, 85(4), 1325–1346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1325
- Janvrin, D. (2008). To what extent does internal control effectiveness increase the value of internal evidence? Managerial Auditing Journal, 23(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900810857712
- Jenkins, J. G., & Haynes, C. M. (2003). The persuasiveness of client preferences: An investigation of the impact of preference timing and client credibility. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2003.22.1.143
- Joe, J. R., Vandervelde, S. D., & Wu, Y. (2017). Use of high quantification evidence in fair value audits: Do auditors stay in their comfort zone? The Accounting Review, 92(5), 89–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51662
- Kadous, K., Kennedy, J. S., & Peecher, M. E. (2003). The effect of quality assessment and directional goal commitment on auditors’ acceptance of client-preferred accounting methods. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 759–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.759
- Kadous, K., Leiby, J., & Peecher, M. E. (2013). How do auditors weight informal contrary advice? The joint influence of advisor social bond and advice justifiability. The Accounting Review, 88(6), 2061–2087. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50529
- Kaplan, S. E., O’Donnell, E. F., & Arel, B. M. (2008). The influence of auditor experience on the persuasiveness of information provided by management. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2008.27.1.67
- Kjellevold, K. (2020). Delegating the monitoring of fair value measurements: A field study of company specialists and audit partners. Working paper. NHH Norwegian School of Economics.
- Koch, C., & Salterio, S. E. (2017). The effects of auditor affinity for client and perceived client pressure on auditor proposed adjustments. The Accounting Review, 92(5), 117–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51703
- Ku, G., Wang, C. S., & Galinsky, A. D. (2015). The promise and perversity of perspective-taking in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 35, 79–102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2015.07.003
- Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
- Lambert, T. A., & Agoglia, C. P. (2011). Closing the loop: Review process factors affecting audit staff follow-through. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(5), 1275–1306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00423.x
- Lambert, T. A., & Peytcheva, M. (2020). When is the averaging effect present in auditor judgments? Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(1), 277–296. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12512
- Luippold, B. L., Kida, T., Piercey, M. D., & Smith, J. F. (2015). Managing audits to manage earnings: The impact of diversions on an auditor’s detection of earnings management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 41, 39–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.07.005
- MacTavish, C. (2018). Audit negotiations: The effect of communicating national office involvement and auditor approach on negotiation outcomes. Managerial Auditing Journal, 33(8–9), 658–682. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-02-2018-1794
- McAllister, M., Kadous, K., & Blay, A. (2020). Fraud brainstorming group composition: The persuasive power of a skeptical minority. The Accounting Review, forthcoming.
- McCallen, J., Agoglia, C. P., & Bennett, G. B. (2020). How the sleeper effect influences auditors’ evaluations of audit evidence. Working paper. University of Georgia and University of Massachusetts Amherst.
- McGuire, W. J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In E. Aronson & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of social psychology ( 2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- McGuire, W. J. (1978). An information-processing model of advertising effectiveness. In H. L. Davis & A. J. Silk (Eds.), Behavioral and management Sciences in marketing (pp. 156–180). Wiley.
- Messier, W. F., Robertson, J. C., & Simon, C. A. (2015). The effects of client management concessions and ingratiation attempts on auditors’ trust and proposed adjustments. Advances in Accounting, 31(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.008
- Mullainathan, S., Schwartzstein, J., & Shleifer, A. (2008). Course thinking and persuasion. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 577–619. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.577
- Neustadt, R. E. (1990). Presidential power and the modern presidents: The politics of leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. Macmillan.
- Ng, T. B., & Shankar, P. G. (2010). Effects of technical department’s advice, quality assessment standards, and client justifications on auditors’ propensity to accept client-preferred accounting methods. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1743–1761. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1743
- Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: A way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
- Peecher, M. E., Piercey, M. D., Rich, J. S., & Tubbs, R. M. (2010). The effects of a supervisor’s active intervention in subordinates’ judgments, directional goals, and perceived technical knowledge advantage on audit team judgments. The Accounting Review, 85(5), 1763–1786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.5.1763
- Perreault, S., & Kida, T. (2011). The relative effectiveness of persuasion tactics in auditor-client negotiations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(8), 534–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2011.09.001
- Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19(1), 123–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2
- Peytcheva, M., & Gillett, P. R. (2011). How partners’ views influence auditor judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 285–301. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10170
- Pickard, M. D., Schuetzler, R., Valacich, J. S., & Wood, D. A. (2020). Innovative accounting interviewing: A comparison of real and virtual accounting interviewers. The Accounting Review, 95(6), 339–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0235
- Piercey, M. D. (2009). Motivated reasoning and verbal vs. numerical probability assessment: Evidence from an accounting context. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 330–341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.05.004
- Piercey, M. D. (2011). Documentation requirements and quantified versus qualitative audit risk assessments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(4), 223–248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-10171
- Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
- Rau, S. E., & Moser, D. V. (1999). Does performing other audit tasks affect going-concern judgments? The Accounting Review, 74(4), 493–508. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.1999.74.4.493
- Reimers, J. L., & Fennema, M. G. (1999). The audit review process and sensitivity to information source objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(1), 117–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.1999.18.1.117
- Ricchiute, D. N. (1999). The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00029-4
- Ricci, M. A. (2020). How higher client service performance affects auditors’ willingness to challenge management’s preferred accounting. Working paper. University of Florida.
- Rich, J. S. (2004). Reviewers’ responses to expectations about the client and the preparer. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 497–517. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.497
- Rich, J. S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(5), 481–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)80165-1
- Robertson, J. C. (2010). The effects of ingratiation and client incentive on auditor judgment. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 69–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.69
- Rose, A. M., Rose, J. M., Suh, I., & Thibodeau, J. C. (2020). Analytical procedures: Are more good ideas always better for audit quality? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 32(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-52512
- Rowe, S. P. (2019). Auditors’ comfort with uncertain estimates: More evidence is not always better. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 76, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.01.002
- Rummell, J. E., DeZoort, F. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2019). Does audit firm tenure matter to audit committee members? Evidence from an accounting dispute. Accounting Horizons, 33(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52346
- Saiewitz, A., & Kida, T. (2018). The effects of an auditor’s communication mode and professional tone on client responses to audit inquiries. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 65, 33–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.10.002
- Salterio, S. E. (2012). Fifteen years in the trenches: Auditor-client negotiations exposed and explored. Accounting and Finance, 52(Suppl.), 233–286. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2012.00499.x
- Salterio, S., & Koonce, L. (1997). The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22(6), 573–587. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(97)00002-0
- Schafer, B. A., & Schafer, J. K. (2019). Interpersonal affect, accountability and experience in auditor fraud risk judgments and the processing of fraud cues. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 22, 43–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-148820190000022004
- Segovia, J., Arnold, V., & Sutton, S. G. (2009). Do principles- vs. rules-based standards have a differential impact on US auditors’ decisions? Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 12, 61–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1475-1488(2009)0000012006
- Shankar, P. G., & Tan, H. (2006). Determinants of audit preparers’ workpaper justifications. The Accounting Review, 81(2), 473–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.473
- Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons.
- Soror, A., Hammer, A., Steelman, B. I., Davis, Z. R., & Limayem, F. D., & M, M. (2015). Good habits gone bad: Explaining negative consequences associated with the use of mobile phones form a dual-systems perspective. Information Systems Journal, 25(4), 403–427. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12065
- Sweeney, J. T., Suh, I. S., Dalton, K. C., & Meljem, S. (2017). Are workpaper reviews preparer-specific? The British Accounting Review, 49(6), 560–577. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.003
- Tan, H., & Jamal, K. (2001). Do auditors objectively evaluate their subordinates’ work? The Accounting Review, 76(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2001.76.1.99
- Tan, H., & Shankar, P. G. (2010). Audit reviewers’ evaluation of subordinates’ work quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 29(1), 251–266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.251
- Tan, H., & Trotman, K. T. (2003). Reviewers’ responses to anticipated stylization attempts by preparers of audit workpapers. The Accounting Review, 78(2), 581–604. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.2.581
- Tan, H., & Yip-Ow, J. (2001). Are reviewers’ judgements influenced by memo structure and conclusions documented in audit workpapers? Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(4), 663–678. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1506/UG8M-8H3D-1GA2-7BYK
- Wilks, T. J. (2002). Predecisional distortion of evidence as a consequence of real-time audit review. The Accounting Review, 77(1), 51–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.1.51
- Wolfe, C. J., Mauldin, E. G., & Diaz, M. C. (2009). Concede or deny: Do management persuasion tactics affect auditor evaluation of internal control deviations? The Accounting Review, 84(6), 2013–2037. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.6.2013
- Yang, L., Brink, A. G., & Wier, B. (2018). The impact of emotional intelligence on auditor judgment. International Journal of Auditing, 22(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12106
- Yip-Ow, J., & Tan, H. (2000). Effects of the preparer’s justification on the reviewer’s hypothesis generation and judgment in analytical procedures. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(2), 203–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00026-4
- Zimmerman, A. B. (2016). The joint impact of management expressed confidence and response timing on auditor professional skepticism in client email inquiries. Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6–7), 566–588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2014-1145