Understanding How Big Data Technologies Reconfigure the Nature and Organization of Financial Statement Audits: A Sociomaterial Analysis

References

• AICPA. (2014). Reimagining auditing in a wired world, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Alles, G. M. (2015). Drivers of the use and facilitators and obstacles of the evolution of Big Data by the audit profession. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, D. A., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and Analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 36(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, M., Cooper, D., & Jamal, K. (2005). Globalization and the coordinating of work in multinational audits. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T., & Estep, C. (2019). One team or two? Investigating relationship quality between auditors and IT specialists: Implications for audit team identity and the audit process. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2142–2177. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedard, J. C., & Graham, L. E. (2002). The effects of decision aid orientation on risk factor identification and audit test planning. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bérard, É. (2014). Management control artefacts: An enabling or constraining tool for action? Questioning the definition and uses of the concept of affordances from a management control perspective. In F. X. De Vaujany, N. Mitev, P. Laniray, & E. Vaast (Eds.), Materiality and time: Technology, work and globalization (pp. 99–123). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Liburd, H., Issa, H., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Behavioral implications of Big Data’s impact on audit judgment and decision making and future research directions. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, M., Chychyla, R., & Stewart, T. (2015). Big Data Analytics in financial statement audits. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, B., & Dirsmith, M. (1993). Sampling and the abstraction of knowledge in the auditing profession: An extended institutional theory perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90024-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, E., Humphrey, C., & Turley, S. W. (2016). Standards of innovation in auditing. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, E., & Turley, S. (2007). The business risk audit: A longitudinal case study of an audit engagement. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4-5), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushing, B. E., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1986). Comparison of audit methodologies of large accounting firms. American Accounting Association.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte. (2015). Audit transparency report for the year ended 31 May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., & Leech, S. A. (2014). A Big 4 firm’s use of information technology to control the audit process: How an audit support system is changing auditor behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 230–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., Leech, S. A., & Moroney, R. (2008). Audit support system design and the declarative knowledge of long-term users. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 5(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta.2008.5.1.99
   Google Scholar
• Eilifsen, A., Kinserdal, W., Messier Jr., W. F., & McKee, W. E. (2020). An exploratory study into the use of audit data analytics on audit engagements. Accounting Horizons, 15(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-121 doi: 10.2308/acch.2001.15.3.193
   Google Scholar
• Eilifsen, A., Knechel, R. W., & Wallage, P. (2001). Application of the business risk audit model: A field study. Accounting Horizons, 15(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.3.193
   Google Scholar
• EY. (2015). Transparency Report 2015. Ernst and Young Global Limited.
   Google Scholar
• EY. (2017). Transparency Report 2017. Ernst and Young Global Limited.
   Google Scholar
• EY. (2018). EY announces blockchain audit technology. Ernst and Young Global Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Faraj, S., & Azad, B. (2012). The materiality of technology: An affordance perspective: Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Weeks, J. (2014). Affordances for practice. Information and Organisation, 24(4), 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, M. J. (1996). “Real-izing” the benefits of new technologies as a source of audit evidence: An interpretive field study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(2-3), 219–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(95)00005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRC. (2017). Audit quality Thematic review: The use of data analytics in the audit of financial statements.
   Google Scholar
• FRC. (2020). Audit quality Thematic review: The Use of technology in the audit of financial statements. Financial Reporting Council Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. E. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting, and knowing (pp. 67–83). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, K. H. (2016). The institutionalization of commercialism in the accounting profession: An identity-experimentation perspective. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultin, L., & Mähring, M. (2014). Visualizing institutional logics in sociomaterial practices. Information and Organization, 24(3), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., & Moizer, P. (1990). From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 1(3), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/1045-2354(90)03021-7
   Google Scholar
• Hutchby, I. (2001). Technology, texts, and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038501000219
   Google Scholar
• Hux, C. T. (2017). Use of specialists on audit engagements: A research synthesis and directions for future research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 39, 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acclit.2017.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASB. (2016). Exploring the growing use of technology in the audit, with a focus on data analytics.
   Google Scholar
• IAASB. (2018). Data analytics working group- March minutes.
   Google Scholar
• ICAEW. (2016). Data analytics for external auditors.
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, K. K. (1998). Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 517–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/096381898336402
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2014). UK Annual Report (including the Transparency Report).
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2015). UK Annual Report (Including the Transparency Report).
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2016). UK Annual Report (including the Transparency Report).
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. (2017). UK Annual Report (Including the Transparency Report).
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, C., Wieneke, A., Vom Brocke, J., Jung, R., & Seidel, S. (2018). How Big Data Analytics enables service innovation: Materiality, affordance, and the individualization of service. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(2), 424–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1451953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, A., & Lyytinen, K. (2013). Towards a theory of affordance ecologies. In F. X. De Vaujany & N. Mitev (Eds.), Materiality and space: Technology, work and globalization (pp. 41–61). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., & Salterio, S. E. (2016). “Doing good field research”: Assessing the quality of audit field research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, D. (2006). A history of auditing: The changing process in Britain from the nineteenth century to the present day. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mcloughlin, B. (2019). The AI tool transforming Moore Kingston Smith’s audit offering. Accountancy Age. https://www.accountancyage.com/2019/10/11/the-ai-tool-transforming-moore-kingston-smiths-audit-offering-part-2/
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, B., & Belo, O. (2016). On the specification of extract, transform, and load patterns behaviour: A domain-language approach. Expert System. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/exsy.12168
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008). Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work, and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520802211644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCAOB. (2018). Annual Report. https://pcaobus.org/About/Administration/Documents/Annual%20Reports/2018-PCAOB-Annual-Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, B. T. (1993). Getting comfortable with the numbers: Auditing and micro-production of macro order. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(7-8), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90045-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus, K. V., Bernardi, R. A., & Ludwig, S. E. (1999). Audit effectiveness versus audit efficiency: Are the two in conflict? International Journal of Auditing, 3(2), 121–133. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1099-1123.00053
   Google Scholar
• Pollock, N., & D’Adderio, L. (2012). Give me a two-by-two matrix and I will create the market: Rankings, graphic visualisations and sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 37(8), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1992). From common sense to expertise: Reflections on the prehistory of audit sampling. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90035-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2013). The apparatus of fraud risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6-7), 525–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PwC. (2014). Building trust through Assurance: Transparency Report, PwC LLP. http://www.pwc.co.uk/transparencyreport/assets/pdf/transparency-report-fy14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• PwC. (2017). Use of data and technology in the audit, PCAOB SG Meeting. PwC LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, K., Humphrey, C., Khalifa, R., & Jones, J. (2007). Transforming audit technologies: Business risk audit methodologies and the audit field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4-5), 409–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salijeni, G., Samsonova-Taddei, A., & Turley, S. (2019). Big Data and changes in audit technology: Contemplating a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 49(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2018.1459458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, J., & Trotman, K. T. (2003). Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: The first 25 years of AOS. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00023-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, D. M., Volkoff, O., Johnson, S. A., Pelletier, L. R., Tulu, B., Bar-On, I., Trudel, J., & Garber, L. (2014). A Theory of organization-EHR affordance actualization. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 15(2), 53–85. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T. (1992). Affordances and prospective control: An outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology, 4(3), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0403_3
   Google Scholar
• Vasarhelyi, M. A., Kogan, A., & Tuttle, B. (2015). Big Data in accounting: An overview. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E., Moll, J., & Newell, S. (2011). Accounting logics, reconfiguration of ERP systems and the emergence of new accounting practices: A sociomaterial perspective. Management Accounting Research, 22(3), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilks, T. J., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2004). Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(3), 719–745. https://doi.org/10.1506/HGXP-4DBH-59D1-3FHJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. W. (2013). Regulatory technologies, risky subjects, and financial boundaries: Governing “fraud” in the financial markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(6-7), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K., Hoogduin, L., & Zhang, L. (2015). Big Data as complementary audit evidence. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar