Preparers’ Construction of Users’ Information Needs in Corporate Reporting: A Case Study

References

• Alexander, D. (2006). Legal certainty, European-ness and realpolitik. Accounting in Europe, 3(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180600920194
   Google Scholar
• Amel-Zadeh, A., Scherf, A., & Soltes, E. F. (2019). Creating firm disclosures. Journal of Financial Reporting, 4(2), 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/jfir-52578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, M., Azzone, G., & Mapelli, F. (2018). What drives the evolution of corporate social responsibility strategies? An institutional logics perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 345–355. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2490232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A., Bond, D., & Sivabalan, P. (2019). Does greater user representation lead to more user focused standards? An empirical investigation of IASB’s approach to standard setting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(2), 65–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, R., Cho, C. H., Sopt, J., & Branco, M. C. (2019). Disclosure responses to a corruption scandal: The case of Siemens AG. Journal of Business Ethics, 156(2), 545–561. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3602-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., Call, A. C., Clement, M. B., & Sharp, N. Y. (2015). Inside the “black box” of sell-side financial analysts. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson-Wall, M., Kraus, K., & Messner, M. (2016). Performance measurement systems and the enactment of different institutional logics: Insights from a football organization. Management Accounting Research, 32, 45–61. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., García Osma, B., Gassen, J., & Imam, S. (in press). The usefulness of financial accounting information: Evidence from the field. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/TAR-2019-1030
   Google Scholar
• Cascino, S., Clatworthy, M., García Osma, B., Gassen, J., Imam, S., & Jeanjean, T. (2014). Who uses financial reports and for what purpose? Evidence from capital providers. Accounting in Europe, 11(2), 185–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2014.940355
   Google Scholar
• Cerbone, D., & Maroun, W. (2020). Materiality in an integrated reporting setting: Insights using an institutional logics framework. The British Accounting Review, 52(3), 100876. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.100876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CFA Institute. (2013). Financial reporting disclosures: Investor perspectives on transparency, trust, and volume. https://www.cfainstitute.org/-/media/documents/article/position-paper/financial-reporting-disclosures-investor-perspectives-on-transparency-trust-volume.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• Chahed, Y., & Goh, L. (2019). Disclosure as collective work. Working Paper. University of Manchester and Hang Seng University of Hongkong. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2316972
   Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H., Masli, A., Sharp, N. Y., & Wood, D. A. (2015). Rotational internal audit programs and financial reporting quality: Do compensating controls help? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 44, 37–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currie, G., & Spyridonidis, D. (2016). Interpretation of multiple institutional logics on the ground: Actors’ position, their agency and situational constraints in professionalized contexts. Organization Studies, 37(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615604503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daske, H., & Gebhardt, G. (2006). International Financial Reporting Standards and experts’ perceptions of disclosure quality. Abacus, 42(3-4), 461–498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00211.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L., & Unerman, J. (2014). Integrated reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1042–1067. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2014-1736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, M. S., Hales, J., & Rees, L. (2019). Disclosure overload? A professional user perspective on the usefulness of general purpose financial statements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 1935–1965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgley, C., Jones, M. J., & Atkins, J. (2015). The adoption of the materiality concept in social and environmental reporting assurance: A field study approach. The British Accounting Review, 47(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertugrul, M., Lei, J., Qiu, J., & Wan, C. (2017). Annual report readability, tone ambiguity, and the cost of borrowing. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 811–836. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109017000187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The logics of budgeting: Theorization and practice variation in the educational field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 281–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, M. (1980). Raising finance and firms’ corporate reporting policies. Abacus, 16(2), 100–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1980.tb00090.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron, Y., & Spira, L. F. (2010). Identity narratives under threat: A study of former members of Arthur Andersen. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, O. (2018). The worth of fair value accounting: Dissonance between users and standard setters. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(3), 1297–1331. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbins, M., Richardson, A., & Waterhouse, J. (1990). The management of corporate financial disclosure: Opportunism, ritualism, policies, and processes. Journal of Accounting Research, 28(1), 121–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2491219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjesdal, F. (1981). Accounting for stewardship. Journal of Accounting Research, 19(1), 208–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2490970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, B., Marton, J., & Söderström, R. (2018). The improbability of fraud in accounting for derivatives: A case study on the boundaries of financial reporting compliance. European Accounting Review, 27(5), 845–873. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1494022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, D. E., & Koonce, L. (1996). Audit analytical procedures: A field investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(2), 457–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1996.tb00511.x
   Google Scholar
• Hitz, J. M., Ernstberger, J., & Stich, M. (2012). Enforcement of accounting standards in Europe: Capital-market-based evidence for the two-tier mechanism in Germany. European Accounting Review, 21(2), 253–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2011.641727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. (2000). Understanding financial accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(8), 763–766. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00021-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASB. (2013). Feedback statement: Discussion forum – Financial reporting disclosure. http://www.ifrs.org/Alerts/PressRelease/Documents/2013/Feedback-Statement-Discussion-Forum-Financial-Reporting-Disclosure-May-2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IASB. (2018). Conceptual framework for financial reporting.
   Google Scholar
• International Integrated Reporting Council. (2013). The international framework. https://integratedreporting.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, T. R., & Plenborg, T. (2018). Company responses to demands for annual report changes. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(6), 1593–1617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2016-2419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, M., & Covaleski, M. A. (2019). Budget formality and informality as a tool for organizing and governance amidst divergent institutional logics. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 75, 40–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, J., Sellhorn, T., & Ahmed, K. (2017). Extreme uncertainty and forward-looking disclosure properties. Abacus, 53(2), 240–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M. H., Lins, K. V., & Miller, D. P. (2003). ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? Journal of Accounting Research, 41(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.00106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennard, A. (2007). Stewardship and the objectives of financial statements: A comment on IASB’s preliminary views on an improved conceptual framework for financial reporting: The objective of financial reporting and qualitative characteristics of decision-useful financial reporting information. Accounting in Europe, 4(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480701308774
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2672910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643–1671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213486447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C. (2016). Practices of standard-setting – An analysis of the IASB’s and FASB’s process of identifying the objective of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 51–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelger, C. (2020). The return of stewardship, reliability and prudence – A commentary on the IASB’s new conceptual framework. Accounting in Europe, 17(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2019.1645960
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, S., & Williams, P. F. (2009). Making imaginary worlds real: The case of expensing employee stock options. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6-7), 770–786. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, K., Young, J., & Power, M. (2017). Themed section on financial accounting as social and organizational practice: Exploring the work of financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 56, 35–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, A., Morris, R. D., & Kang, H. (2019). Disclosure overload? An empirical analysis of International Financial Reporting Standards disclosure requirements. Abacus, 55(1), 205–236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A. (2015). Reflexivity in sustainability accounting and management: Transcending the economic focus of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 525–536. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2058-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2008). SEC charges Siemens AG for engaging in worldwide bribery. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-294.htm
   Google Scholar
• Siemens. (2020). Sustainability information 2020. https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:13f56263-0d96-421c-a6a4-9c10bb9b9d28/sustainability2020-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stenka, R., & Jaworska, S. (2019). The use of made-up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 78, 101055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubbs, W., & Higgins, C. (2014). Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), 1068–1089. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-03-2013-1279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–128). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n4
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0187
   Google Scholar
• Young, J. J. (2006). Making up users. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 579–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuthas, K., Rogers, R., & Dillard, J. F. (2002). Communicative action and corporate annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1-2), 141–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021314626311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Andrew, J. (2014). Financialisation and the conceptual framework. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2012.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar