Do Good Intentions Pay Off? Employee Responses to Well-Intended Actions with Risky Outcomes

References

• Abdel-Rahim, H. Y., & Liu, J. (2021). The interactive effect of punishment and communication on trust and reciprocity: An experimental examination in a gift-exchange setting. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805990
   Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rahim, H. Y., & Stevens, D. E. (2018). Information system precision and honesty in managerial reporting: A re-examination of information asymmetry effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 64, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rahim, H. Y., Hales, J., & Stevens, D. E. (2021a). How far will managers go to look like a good steward? An examination of preferences for trustworthiness and honesty in managerial reporting. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Rahim, H. Y., Liu, J., & Stevens, D. E. (2021b). The moderating effect of social norm sensitivity on organizational control: An experimental examination using a participative budgeting setting. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3569067
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. C., Hannan, R. L., & Tafkov, I. D. (2018). Team member subjective communication in homogeneous and heterogeneous teams. The Accounting Review, 93(5), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1997). Explaining bargaining impasse: The role of self-serving biases. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.1.109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2008). The fragility of fairness: An experimental investigation on the conditional status of pro-social norms. Philosophical Issues, 18(1), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-6077.2008.00146.x
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, M., Engelmann, D., & Normann, H. T. (2011). A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games and Economic Behavior, 72(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2010.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, W., Kuang, X., & Majerczyk, M. (2021). The effects of minimum-wage increases on wage offers, wage premiums and employee effort under incomplete contracts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 89, 101195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock, J. M., Lange, A., & Ozbay, E. Y. (2013). Dictating the risk: Experimental evidence on giving in risky environments. American Economic Review, 103(1), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. L., Martin, P. R., Moser, D. V., & Weber, R. A. (2015). The consequences of hiring lower-wage workers in an incomplete-contract environment. The Accounting Review, 90(3), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, M., & Ostermaier, A. (2019). Sabotage in capital budgeting: The effects of control and honesty on investment decisions. European Accounting Review, 28(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2017.1412338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cettolin, E., Riedl, A., & Tran, G. (2017). Giving in the face of risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 55(2), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11166-017-9270-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, E. W., Lill, J. B., & Maas, V. S. (2021). Promote internally or hire externally? The role of trust, reciprocity, and performance measurement precision. Working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3849098
   Google Scholar
• Charness, G., & Levine, D. I. (2007). Intention and stochastic outcomes: An experimental study. The Economic Journal, 117(522), 1051–1072. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. X., & Sandino, T. (2012). Can wages buy honesty? The relationship between relative wages and employee theft. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(4), 967–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00456.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. L., Schonger, M., & Wickens, C. (2016). oTree—An open-source platform for laboratory, online, and field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 9, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. (2014). Can offering a signing bonus motivate effort? Experimental evidence of the moderating effects of labor market competition. The Accounting Review, 89(2), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H. (2013). An experimental investigation of the interactions among intentions, reciprocity, and control. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 25(1), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50443
   Google Scholar
• Christ, M. H., Sedatole, K. L., & Towry, K. L. (2012). Sticks and carrots: The effect of contract frame on effort in incomplete contracts. The Accounting Review, 87(6), 1913–1938. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Kuang, X. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory, 33(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0153-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, B. I. (2019). The effects of reciprocity and self-awareness on honesty in managerial reporting: Social value orientation matters. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 31(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douthit, J. D., Liu, J., Schwartz, S. T., & Young, R. A. (2022). An experimental study of endogenous discretionary controls on employee effort. European Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2063151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douthit, J. D., & Stevens, D. E. (2015). The robustness of honesty effects on budget proposals when the superior has rejection authority. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 467–493. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exley, C. L. (2016). Excusing selfishness in charitable giving: The role of risk. Review of Economic Studies, 83(2), 587–628. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Riedl, A. (1993). Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity, and altruism—Experimental evidence and new theories. In S.-C. Kolm, & J. Mercier Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity (Vol. 1, pp. 615–691). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0714(06)01008-6
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. G., Peffer, S. A., Sprinkle, G. B., & Williamson, M. G. (2015). Performance target levels and effort: Reciprocity across single-and repeated-interaction settings. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(2), 145–164. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51089
   Google Scholar
• Freundt, J., & Lange, A. (2017). On the determinants of giving under risk. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gago, A. (2021). Reciprocity and uncertainty: When do people forgive? Journal of Economic Psychology, 84, 102362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, J. B., Livingston, J. A., Tayler, W. B., Cade, N. L., & McVay, S. E. (2019). Controls and cooperation in interactive and non-interactive settings. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2494–2520. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groen, B. A. (2018). A survey study into participation in goal setting, fairness, and goal commitment: Effects of including multiple types of fairness. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30(2), 207–240. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-52072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Z., & Van der Weele, J. J. (2017). Dual-process reasoning in charitable giving: Learning from non-results. Games, 8(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.3390/g8030036
   Google Scholar
• Hannan, R. L. (2005). The combined effect of wages and firm profit on employee effort. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, S. J., & Towry, K. L. (2002). Negotiated transfer pricing: Is fairness easier said than done? The Accounting Review, 77(3), 571–593. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, K. O., Webb, R. A., & Vance, T. (2015). The interactive effects of ex post goal adjustment and goal difficulty on performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-50729
   Google Scholar
• Kuang, X., & Moser, D. V. (2009). Reciprocity and the effectiveness of optimal agency contracts. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1671–1694. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuang, X., & Moser, D. V. (2011). Wage negotiation, employee effort, and firm profit under output-based versus fixed-wage incentive contracts. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01050.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, V. S., van Rinsum, M., & Towry, K. L. (2012). In search of informed discretion: An experimental investigation of fairness and trust reciprocity. The Accounting Review, 87(2), 617–644. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majerczyk, M. (2018). The effect of labor market competition on control system design: An experimental investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 71, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, S., & Rau, H. A. (2019). Decisions under uncertainty in social contexts. Games and Economic Behavior, 116, 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regner, T. (2018). Reciprocity under moral wiggle room: Is it a preference or a constraint? Experimental Economics, 21(4), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-017-9551-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Loewenstein, G. (1992). Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51(2), 176–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(92)90010-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Weele, J. J., Kulisa, J., Kosfeld, M., & Friebel, G. (2014). Resisting moral wiggle room: How robust is reciprocal behavior? American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(3), 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.6.3.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, M. G. (2008). The effects of expanding employee decision making on contributions to firm value in an informal reward environment. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4), 1183–1209. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar