The role of intermediate demand and technology for international competitiveness of the KIBS sector: evidence from European Union countries

References

• Akamai. 2013. The State of the Internet. 2nd Quarter 2013 Report. 6(2). http://it.akamai.com/dl/documents/akamai_soti_q213.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amable, B., and B. Verspagen. 1995. “The Role of Technology in Market Shares Dynamics.” Applied Economics 27 (2): 197–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, S.O., and P.H. Egger. 2013. “Endogenous Product Versus Process Innovation and a Firm's Propensity to Export”. Empirical Economics 44 (1): 329–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balassa, B. 1964. “The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrine: A Reappraisal.” Journal of Political Economy 72 (6): 564–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baláž, V. 2004a. “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services in Transition Economies.” The Service Industries Journal 24 (4): 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baláž, V. 2004b. “Patterns of Intermediate Consumption and Productivity in the Knowledge Intensive Services in Transition Economies.” Ekonomický časopis 52 (3): 298–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkley, I. 2007. “Trading in Ideas and Knowledge.” A Report Prepared for the Knowledge Economy Programme. London: The Work Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, H., and J. Singelmann. 1978. “The Transformation of the U.S. Labor Force: The Interaction of Industry and Occupation.” Politics and Society 8 (3–4): 481–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantwell, J. 2005. “Innovation and Competitiveness.” In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, edited by J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, and R.R. Nelson, 543–567. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ceglowski, J. 2017. “Assessing Export Competitiveness Through the Lens of Value Added.” The World Economy 40 (2): 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charemza, W.W., and D.F. Deadman. 1997. Nowa ekonometria. Warsaw: PWE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L. 2011. “Research on Knowledge-Intensive Services Trade Competitiveness, Advances in Education and Management.” Communications in Computer and Information Science 211: 342–346.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., and K. Guy. 1998. “Innovation and Competitiveness: A Review.” Technological Analysis and Strategic Management 10 (3): 363–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deardorff, A.V. 2001. “International Provision of Trade Services, Trade, and Fragmentation.” Policy Research Working Paper Series 2548. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., K. Pavitt, and L. Soete. 1990. The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Dosi, G., M. Grazzi, and D. Moschella. 2015. “Technology and Costs in International Competitiveness: From Countries and Sectors to Firms.” Research Policy 44 (10): 1795–1814.
   Google Scholar
• Dosso, M. 2011. Sectoral Dynamics of International Trade and Technological Change. Paris: Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne, University Paris.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Broadband Internet Access Costs (BIAC). Final Report. Brussel: Van Dijk Management Consultants S.A. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/sites/digital-agenda/files/BIAC-2012-Final%20report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2011. Eurostat Indicators of High-tech Industry and Knowledge – Intensive Services, Annex 2 – High-tech Aggregation by NACE Rev. 1.1. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2014. Services Trade by Enterprise Characteristics – STEC. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016. International Trade in Services (since 2004). Luxembourg: Eurostat.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, R., M. Lucchese, and V. Meliciani. 2013. “The Contribution of Business Services to the Export Performances of Manufacturing Industries. An Empirical Study on 5 European Countries.” Working Papers From Birkbeck Centre for Innovation and Management Research 14. London: Birkbeck, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• EViews Help: Estimating a Cointegrating Regression. 2016a. www.eviews.com.
   Google Scholar
• EViews Help: Estimating Panel Cointegration in EViews. 2016b. www.eviews.com.
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 1996. “Technology and Competitiveness.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 12 (3): 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freund, C., and D. Weinhold. 2002. “The Internet and International Trade in Services.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 92 (2): 236–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarascio, D., M. Pianta, M. Lucchese, and F. Bogliacino. 2015. “Business Cycles, Technology and Exports.” Economia Politica 32 (2): 167–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarascio, D., M. Pianta, and F. Bogliacino. 2016. “Export, R&D and New Products. A Model and a Test on European Industries.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 26 (4): 869–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrieri, P., and V. Meliciani. 2005. “Technology and International Competitiveness: The Interdependence Between Manufacturing and Producer Services.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16 (4): 489–502.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekman, B., and A. Mattoo. 2008. “Services Trade and Development. Policy Research.” Working Paper 4461. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Javalgi, R.G., A.C. Gross, W.B. Joseph, and E. Granot. 2011. “Assessing Competitive Advantage of Emerging Markets in Knowledge Intensive Business Services.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 26 (3): 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landesmann, M., and M. Paffermayr. 1997. “Technological Competition and International Trade.” Applied Economics 29 (2): 179–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. 1999. “The Impact of Technological Opportunity on the Dynamics of Trade Performance.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 10 (3–4): 341–357.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K. 2015. “Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives Measures of International Specialization.” Eurasian Business Review 5: 99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and I. Drejer. 1997. “Do Inter-sectoral Linkages Matter for International Export Specialisation?” DRUID Working Paper 15. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School and Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and V. Meliciani. 2000. “The Importance of Technology-Based Inter-Sectoral Linkages for Market Share Dynamics.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Journal 136 (4): 702–723.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., and V. Meliciani. 2010. “The Role of ICT Knowledge Flows for International Market Share Dynamics.” Research Policy 39 (5): 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowska, M.S., and T. Golebiowski. 2014. “Innovation and International Competitiveness of Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania.” In Geo-Regional Competitiveness in Central and Eastern Europe, the Baltic Countries and Russia, edited by A. Zhuplev and K. Liuhto, 57–83. Hershey: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S.B. 1961. An Essay on Trade and Transformation. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells, Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, G.G., S.J. Savage, and S.Y. Thong. 1999. “Technology, Investment and Trade: Empirical Evidence for Five Asia-Pacific Countries.” MPRA Paper 10585. Munich: University of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Marel, E. 2011. “Determinants of Comparative Advantage in Services.” Working Paper. Paris: Group d'Economie Mondiale.
   Google Scholar
• Marel, E., and B. Shepherd. 2013. “Service Trade, Regulation and Regional Integration: Evidence from Sectoral Data.” The World Economy 36 (11): 1393–1405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meliciani, V. 2001. Technology, Trade and Growth in OECD Countries: Does Specialization Matter. London: Routlege, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Miozzo, M., and L. Soete. 2001. “Internationalization of Services: A Technological Perspective.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 67 (4): 159–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misala, J. 2001. Współczesne teorie wymiany międzynarodowej i zagranicznej polityki ekonomicznej. Warsaw: SGH.
   Google Scholar
• Nusbaumer, J. 1987. Services in the Global Market. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. STAN Database for Structural Analysis, STAN R&D Expenditures in Industry (ISIC Rev. 3/ISIC Rev. 4), National Currency. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, N. 2001. “Must the Growth Rate Decline?” Oxford Economic Papers 5/3 (4): 605–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, P., and B. Hansen. 1990. “Statistical Inference in Instrumental Variables Regression with I(1) Processes.” Review of Economic Studies 57 (1): 99–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M.V. 1961. “International Trade and Technical Change.” Oxford Economic Papers 13 (3): 323–341.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, A., and E. Lutz. 1981. “Trade in Services: Economic Determinants and Development-Related Issues.” Staff Working Paper 480. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Schricke, E., A. Zenker, and T. Stahlecker. 2012. “Knowledge-Intensive (Business) Services in Europe.” EUR 25189: 52. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Siggel, E. 2007. The Many Dimensions of Competitiveness, International Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage: A Survey and a Proposal for Measurement. Venice: CESifo Venice Summer Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Szekely, T. 2013. “Romania Among Top 10 Outsourcing Locations Globally.” The Outsourcing Journal, Special Edition: Central and Eastern Europe. A Colorful Outsourcing Landscape 2 (3): 58–64.
   Google Scholar
• Timmer, M., T. van Moergastel, E. Stuivenwold, G. Ypma, M. O'Mahony, and M. Kangasniemi. 2007. EU KLEMS Growth and Productivity Accounts, Part I Methodology. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. 2015. “International Trade in ICT Services and ICT-Enabled Services.” UNCTAD Technical Notes on ICT for Development 3. http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/tn_unctad_ict4d03_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Verspagen, B., and K. Wakelin. 1997. “Trade and Technology from a Schumpeterian Perspective.” International Review of Applied Economics 11 (2): 181–194.
   Google Scholar
• Warf, B. 2012. “US International Trade in Knowledge Intensive Business Services.” In Knowledge Intensive Business Services, Geography and Innovation, edited by D. Doloreux, M. Freel, and R. Schearmur, 19–42. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Welfens, P.J. 1987. “Growth, Innovation and International Competitiveness.” Intereconomics 22 (7): 168–174.
   Google Scholar
• WIOD. 2013. World Input-Output Database. Luxembourg: European Commission. http://www. wiod.org.
   Google Scholar
• WIOD. 2013a. National Input-Output Tables. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• WIOD. 2013b. World Input-Output Tables (Exchange rates used to Convert National Values into US$). Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• WIOD. 2014. Socio Economic Accounts. Luxembourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Woerz, J. 2008. “Austria's Competitiveness in Trade in Services.” FIW Research Report 003. Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 1995. General Agreement on Trade in Service. Annex 1b. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WTO. 2014. Trade in Commercial Services. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. 2005. Handel usługami w procesie integracji europejskiej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. 2014. “Competitiveness in International Trade in Knowledge Intensive Services – The Case of Poland.” Comparative Economic Research, Central and Eastern Europe 17 (2): 79–100.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. 2016a. Usługi biznesowe oparte na wiedzy. Wpływ na konkurencyjność gospodarki na przykładzie wybranych krajów Unii Europejskiej. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
   Google Scholar
• Wyszkowska-Kuna, J. 2016b. “Competitiveness of the New European Union Member States in International Trade in Knowledge-Intensive Business Services.” Comparative Economic Research, Central and Eastern Europe 19 (3): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar