Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Mental Health Volume 11, 2002 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
36
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Establishing and quantifying the preferences of mental health service users for day hospital care: A pilot study using conjoint analysis

Michael Townend 1Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Birmingham
&
Phil Shackley 2School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield.
Pages 85-96 | Published online: 06 Jul 2009

  • Almaraz-Serrano, A.M., Marshall, M. & Creed, F. (1998). The effectiveness of day hospital treatment for psychiatric disorders (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, 3. Oxford. Update Software.
  • Barnes, M., Hall, D., Leurs, R., Mclver, S & Stewart, J. (1997). Citizen participation: A framework for Evaluation. Occasional Paper 11. School of Public Policy. University of Birmingham.
  • Barnes, M. & Bowl, R. (2001). Taking over the asylum empowerment and mental health. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Bowl, R. (1996). Legislating for user involvement in the United Kingdom: Mental health services in the NHS and Community Care Act 1990. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 42, 165-180.
  • Bowling, A. & Rees Jones, I. (1997). Costing health services: Healtheconomics. In Ann Bowling (Ed.). Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services, Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Bradley, M. (1991). Users manual for the SPEED version 2.1. Stated preference experiment editor and designer. Hague: Hague Consulting Group.
  • Bryan, S., Buxton, M., Sheldon, R. & Grant, A. (1998). Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: An Investigation of Preferences. Health Economics, 7, 595-603.
  • Cambell, P. & Lindow, V. (1997). Changing practice, mental health nursing and user empowerment. London: RCN & MIND.
  • Cave, M., Burningham, D., Buxton, M., Hanney, S., Pollitt, C., Scanlon, M. & Shurmer, M. (1993). The valuation of changes in quality of life in the public service. London: HMSO.
  • DoH (1998). Modernising mental health services:Safe, sound and supportive. London: Department of Health.
  • DoH (1999). Modern standards and service models: Mental health national service framework. London: Department of Health.
  • DoH (2000). The NHS plan: A plan for investment, a plan for reform. London: Department of Health.
  • Hanemann, W. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69, 332-341.
  • Keijsers, G.P.J., Schapp, C.P.D.R. & Hoogduin, C.A.L. (2000). The impact of interpersonal patient and therapist behavior on outcome in cognitive behavior therapy. Behaviour Modification, 24, 264-297.
  • Pearniain, D., Swanson, J., Kroes, E. & Bradley, M. (1991). Stated preference techniques: A guide to practice, 2nd Edition. Hague: Steer Davies Gleave and Hague Consulting Group.
  • Ratcliffe, J. (2000). The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness to pay values: Proceed with caution? International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 16, 270-290.
  • Ratcliffe, J. & Buxton, M. (1999). Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 15, 340-351.
  • Rogers, A. & Pilgrim. D. (1991). Pulling down churches, accounting for the British mental health users movement. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13, 129148.
  • Rose, D., Ford, R., Lindley. P. & Gawith, L & the KCW Mental Health Monitoring Users Group. (1998). In our experience: User monitoring of memal health services. London: Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.
  • Ryan, M. & Hughes. J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to value surgical versus medical management of miscarriage. Health Economics, 6, 261-273.
  • Ryan, M., McIntosh, E. & Shackley, P. (1998). Using conjoint analysis to elicit the views of health service users: An application to the patient health card. Health Expectations, 1, 117-129.
  • Salvio, M., Beutler, L., Wood, J. & Engle, D. (1992). The strength of the therapeutic alliance in three treatments for depression. Psychotherapy Research, 2, 31-46.
  • San Miguel, F., Ryan, M. & McIntosh, E. (2000). Applying conjoint analysis in economic evaluations: An application to menorrhagia. Applied Economics, 32, 823-833.
  • STATA (1997) Stata statistical software: Release 5.0. College Station, TX: STATA Corporation.
  • Stewart, J., Kendall, E. & Coote, E. (1994). Citizens' Juries. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.
  • Vick, S. & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in Health care. Examining patients preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587-605.
  • Williams, B. & Wilkinson, G. (1995). Patient satisfaction in mental health care: Evaluating an evaluative model. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 559562.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.