Assessing alcohol treatment composite outcome: Further evidence utilizing brief measures

References

• Allen, J .P., Columbus, M. & Fertig, J. (1995). Assess-ment in alcoholismtreatment: An overview. In J.P. Allen & M. Columbus (Eds.), NIAAA Treatment Handbook Series 4, Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guidefor Cliniciansand Researchers. Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Human Serv-ices.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J.P., Litten, R.Z. & Anton, R. (1992). Measures of alcohol consumption in perspective. In R.Z. Litten & J.P. Allen (Eds.), Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psychosocial and Biochemical Methods, pp. 205–226. Totowa, NJ: Humana.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders —IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Associa-tion.
   Google Scholar
• Babor, T.F., Dolinsky, Z., Rounsaville, B. & Jaffe, J. (1988) . Unitary versus multidimensional models of alcoholism treatment outcome: An empirical study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 49, 167–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babor. T.F., Longabaugh, R., Zweben, A., Fuller, R., Stout, R., Anton, R. & Randall, C. (1994). Issues in the definition and measurement of drinking out-comes in alcoholismtreatmentresearch.Journalof Studies on Alcohol, 12 (Supplement), 101–111.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, P., Cis ler, R.A., Anton, R. & Zweben, A. (1999). Short-term (3-month) composite outcome status and CDT levels 1- year po st treatment.A/co holism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, Abstract 737,128A.
   Google Scholar
• Burnam, M.A. (1996) . Measuring outcomes of care for sub stance use and mental disorders. In H.R. Lamb (Ed.), New Dire ctionsfor Mental Health Services, Using Client Outcomes Information to Improve Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment, 71(Fall). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cis ler, R.A., Anton, R., Zweben, A. & Bean, P. (1999). Long-term (12-month) remission status and CDT levels 1-year post treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical andExperimentalResearch, 23, Ab stract738,128A.
   Google Scholar
• Cisler, R.A. & Zweben, A. (1999). Development of a composite measure for assessing alc ohol treatment outcome: Op erationalizationand validation. Alco-holism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, 263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J.A., An sara, D., Wild, T.C., Toneatto, T. & Koski-Jannes, A. (1999). What is the price of perfection? The hidden costs of using detailed assessment instruments to measure alcohol con-sumption. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60,756–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J. & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, D.M. (1988). Assessment of addictive behaviors: Implication of an emerging biopsychosocialmodel. In D.M. Donovan & G.A. Marlatt (Eds.),AssessmentofAddictiveBehaviors, pp. 3–48. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, A., Brown, D., Edwards, G., Oppenheimer,E., Sheehan, M. & Taylor, C. (1985). Alcoholism and the nature of outcome. British Journal of Addic-tion, 80, 153–162.
   Google Scholar
• Emrick, C.D. & Hansen, J. (1983). Assertions regard-ing effectiveness of treatment for alcoholism. American Psychologist, 38, 1078–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feragne, M.A., Longabaugh, R. & Stevenson, J.F. (1983). The Ps ycho soc ial Functioning Inventory. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 6, 25–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, J. & Corcoran, K. (1994). Measuresfor Clini-cal Practice: A Source Book (2"a Edition; Volume 2. Adults). New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J.H., Powell, J.E., Marshall, F.J. & Peters, T.J. (1999). Quality of life in alcohol dependent sub-jects - A review. Quality of Life Research, 8,225–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Health Outcomes Institute and RAND Corporation (1993). Health Status Questionnaire, Version 2.0. New York: NCS Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Heather, N. & Tebbutt, J. (1989). Definitions of non-abstinent and abstinent categories in alcoholism treatment outcomes classifications: A review and proposal. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 24,83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, K.I., Lueger,R.J., Maling, M. S. & Martinovich, Z. (1993). A phase model of psychotherapy out-come: Causal mediation of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61,678–685.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, K.I., Moras, K., Brill, P.L., Martinovich,Z. & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness Andpatientprogres s .Ameri-can Psychologist, 51, 1059–1064.
   Google Scholar
• King, A.C., Vanable, P.A. & de Wit, H. (2000). Psy-chometric instruments to evaluate ou tc ome in alco-holism treatment. In G. Zernig, A. Saria, M. Kurz & S.S. G Malley (Eds.), Handbook of Alcoholism. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lettieri, D.J. (1992). Primer of research strategies in alcoholism treatment assessment: NIAAA Treat-ment Handbook Series 3. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Litten, R.Z. & Allen, J.P. (Eds.) (1992). Measuring Alcohol Consumption: Psycho socialandBiochemi-cal Methods. Totowa, NJ: Human Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longabaugh, R. (1991). Monitoring treatment out-comes. Alcohol Health & Research World, 15, 189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Longabaugh, R., Mattson, ME., Connors, G.J., & Cooney, N.L. (1994) . Quality of life as an outcome variable in alcoholismtreatment research. Journal of Studies onAlcohol, SupplementNo. 12 (Decem-ber), 119–129.
   Google Scholar
• Maisto, S.A. & Connors, G.J. (1988). Assessment of treatment outcome. In D.M. Donovan & G.A. Marlatt (Eds.), Assessment of Addictive Behaviors, pp. 421–453. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, AT., Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, R., Smith, I., Grissom, G., Pettinati, H. & Argeriou, M. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 199–213.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, AT., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J. & Griffith, J.E. (1985) . New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 173, 412–423.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R. (1996) . Form 90: A struc tured as ses sment interview for drinking and related behaviors. In ME. Mattson (Ed.), NIAAA ProjectMATCH Mono-graph Series (Vol. 5). Bethesda, MD: US Depart-ment of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W .R. & Del Boca, F.K. (1994) .Measurementof drinking behavior using the Form 90 family of instruments. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Sup-plement No. 12 (December), 112–118.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W.R., Tonigan, J. S. & Longabaugh, R. (1995). The Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC): An in strumentfor assessing adverse consequences of alcohol abuse. In ME. Mattson (Ed.), NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series (Vol. 6). Bethesda, MD: US Department of Health and Hu-man Services.
   Google Scholar
• Pettanati, H.M., Sugerman, A.A., DiDonato, N. & Maurer, H.S. (1982). The natural history of alco-holism over four years after treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43,210–215.
   Google Scholar
• Project MATCH Research Group (1993). Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treat-ment. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Re-search, 17, 1130–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project MATCH Research Group (1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Proj ectMATCH post treatmentdrinking outcome s. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobell, L.C. & Sobell, M.B. (1990). Self-report issues in alcohol abuse: State of the art and future direc-tions. Behavior Assessment, 12, 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Tonigan, J.S. (1995). Issues in alcohol treatment out-come assessment. In J.P. Allen & M. Columbus (Eds.), NIAAA Treatment Handbook Series 4, As-sessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. Bethesda, MD: NIAAA, De-partment of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• Tonigan,J.S., Miller, W.R. & Brown, J.M. (1997). The reliability of Form 90: An ins trument for assessing alcohol treatment outcome. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M. & Keller, S.D. (1998). SF-12: How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales, (3rd Edition.). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, J.E. & Sherbourne, C.D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Status Survey (SF-36): 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medi-cal Care, 30, 473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware, J.E., Snow, K.K., Kosinski, M. & Gandek, B. (1993) . SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpre-tation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zweben, A., & Cisler, R. (1996). Composite outcome measures in alcohol treatment research: Problems and potentialities. Substance Use and Misuse, 31, 1783–1805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar