References
- Department of Health (2001). Reference Guide to Consent for Examination or Treatment. Lon-don: Department of Health.
- Earthrowl, M., O'Grady, J. & Birmingham, L. (2003). Providing treatment to prisoners with mental disorders: development of a policy. Selective literature review and expert consulta-tion exercise. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 299–302.
- Grisso, T. & Appelbaum, P.S. (1998). Assessing Competence to Consent to Treatment. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Grisso, T., Appelbaum, P.S. & Hill-Fotouhi, C. (1997). The MacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1415— 1419.
- Jones, K. (1991). Law and Mental Health: Sticks or Carrots. In Berrios, G.E. & Freeman, H. (eds), 150 Years of British Psychiatry. 1841–1991. (pp. 89–102). London: Gaskell.
- Rose, N. (1998). Governing risky individuals: the role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 5, 177–185.
- Secretary of State for Health and Home Secretary (2000). Reforming the Mental Health Act. London: Stationery Office Cm 5016—I and 2.
- Strachan, E. & Spaulding, W. (2003). Psychologi-cal and psychopathological constructs relevant to involuntary psychiatric treatment. Journal of Mental Health, 12, 435–442.
- Schopp, R.F. (2001). Competence, Condemnation and Commitment: An Integrated Theory of Mental Health Law. Washington, American Psychological Association.
- Szmukler, G. & Holloway, F. (1998). Mental health legislation is now a harmful anachron-ism. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 662–665.
- Szmukler, G. & Holloway, F. (2001). Mental Health Law: Discrimination or Protection? Maudsley Discussion Paper No 10. London: Institute of Psychiatry.
- Szmukler, G. (2003). Risk assessment: Numbers and values Psychiatric Bulletin, 27, 205–207.