Issues in the development of advance directives in mental health care

References

• Age Concern & Centre of Medical Law and Ethics Working Party Report (1988). The Living Will: Consent to treatment at the end of li fe. London: King's College.
   Google Scholar
• Airedale NHS Trust v. Bland [1993] AC 789 (HL).
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association (1995). Opinions of the Ethics Committee on the Principles of Medical Ethics. Washington: American Psy-chiatric Association.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, J.M. & Patterson, L.E. (2001). Review of Literature Relating to Mental Health Legis-lation. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Backlar, P. (1998). Ethics in community mental health care: advance directives for subjects of research who have fluctuating cognitive im-pairments due to psychotic disorders (such as schizophrenia). Community Mental Health Journal, 34, 229–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazelon Center (1999). Psychiatric Advance Di-rective. http://www.bazelon.org/advdir.html.
   Google Scholar
• Beauchamp, T.L. & Childress, J.F. (1983). Prin-ciples of Bioethics. New York: Oxford Uni-versity Press.
   Google Scholar
• British Medical Association (1995). Advance Statements about Medical Treatment. London: BMJ Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.J. (1995). Advance directives move into mental health care. Clinical Psychiatry News, July 10–11.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M.P. & Conacher, G.N. (1994). Legally untreatable— a new category of long stay patient. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 433 —435.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J., King, M., Papageorgiou, A. & Davidson, 0. (2001). Legal pitfalls of psychia-tric research. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 67 — 70.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Home Office (2000). Reforming the Mental Health Act. London: Department of Health and Home Office 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (1999a). Report of the Expert Committee, Review of the Mental Health Act. London: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health (2002). Draft Mental Health Bill. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Downie, R.S. & Calman, K.C. (1987). Healthy Respect: Ethics in Health Care. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. (1984). Bound to treatment: the Ulysses contract. The Hastings Center Report, 14, June, 13 — 16.
   Google Scholar
• Dresser, R. (1995). Dworkin on dementia; elegant theory, questionable policy. Hastings Center Report, 25, June, 32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Fleishner, R.D. (1998). Advance directives for mental health care: An analysis of state statutes. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 4, 788–804.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, E.M. (1998). Advance directives for psychiatric care: A theoretical and practical overview for legal professionals. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 4, 746–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, M. (1994). The meaning of incapacity. Medical Law Review, 2, 8–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Halpern, A. & Szmukler, G. (1997). Psychiatric advance directives: reconciling autonomy and non-consensual treatment. Psychiatric Bulle-tin, 21, 323–327.
   Google Scholar
• Health Technology Board for Scotland (2002). The use of newer (atypical) antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia. Glasgow: HTBS.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, T., Diamond, R.J. & Wikler, D. (1982). Is there a case for voluntary commitment? In: T.L. Beauchamp & L. Walters, (eds), Con-temporary Issues in Bioethics. (pp. 163–157). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, M.B. (1994). Implications of the Patient Self-determination Act for psychiatric prac-tice. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 355–358.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambert, P., Mciver Gibson, J. & Nathanson, P. (1990). The values history: An innovation in surrogate medical decision-making. Law Med-icine and Health Care, 18, 202–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lane v. Candura (1978) 376 NE 2d 1232 (Mass App Ct).
   Google Scholar
• Malette v. Shulman (1990) 67 DLR (4th) 321, [1991] 2 Med LR 162 (Ont CA).
   Google Scholar
• Manic Depression Fellowship (2001). Planning ahead for people with manic depression. Lon-don: Manic Depression Fellowship.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J.S. (1859/1969). On Liberty. In: M. Warnock (ed.) Utilitarianism. London: Collins/Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• National Schizophrenia Fellowship (1999). Better Act Now: NSF's views on the Mental Health Act Review. London: National Schizophrenia Fellowship.
   Google Scholar
• NICE (2002). Guidance in the use of newer (atypical) antipsychotic drugs for the treatment of schizophrenia. Technology Appraisal Gui-dance No 43 London: NHS National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill, 0. (2002). Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pellegrino, E.D. (1992). Ethics. Journal of the
   Google Scholar
• American Medical Association, 268, 354–356.
   Google Scholar
• President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983). Making Health Care Decisions. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Re C (adult: refusal of medical treatment) [1994] 1 All ER 819 (Fam Div).
   Google Scholar
• Re Maida Yetter (1973). 96 D & C 2d 619 (CP Northampton County PA).
   Google Scholar
• Re T (adult: refusal of treatment) [1992] 4 All ER 649 (CA).
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, J.A. & Centifanti, J.B. (1991). Beyond 'self-paternalism': Response to Rosenson and Kasten. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, L.H., Meisel, A. & Lidz, C.W. (1977). Tests of Competency to Consent to Treatment. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, G.N. (1993). The health care proxy for mental illness: can it work and should we want it to? Bulletin of the American Academy Psychiatry Law, 21, 161–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2001a). Report on the Review of the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Executive (2001b). Renewing Mental Health Law Policy Statement. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Parliament (2002). Mental Health ( Scot- land) Bill. Edinburgh: Stationery Office. Sidaway v. Bethlem Royal Hospital Governors [1985] AC 871.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherby, K., Szmukler, G.I., Halpern, A., Alex-ander, M., Thornicroft, G., Johnson, C., & Wright, S. (1999). A study of psychiatric 'crisis cards' in a community psychiatric service. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 100, 56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherby, K. & Szmukler, G. (1998). Crisis cards and self help crisis initiatives. Psychiatric Bulletin, 22, 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, T. (1982a). Involuntary Mental Hospitali-zation: A crime against humanity. In: T.L. Beauchamp & W. Leroy (eds), Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. (pp. 148-153). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, T. (1982b). The psychiatric will. A new mechanism for protecting persons against 'psychosis' and psychiatry. American Psychol-ogist, 37, 762–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, P.R. (1998). The triumph of autonomy in American Bioethics: A sociological view. In: R. Devries & J. Subed (eds), Bioethics and Society: Constructing the Ethical Enterprise. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar