A new pyramid of research knowledge for the NHS

References

• American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators (cited in Rossi et al., 2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Agras W. S., Berkowitz R. Clinical research in behaviour therapy: Half way there?. Behaviour Therapy 1980; 11: 472–487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkham M., Evans C., Margison F., McGrath G., Mellor-Clark J., Milne D. L., Connell J. The rationale for developing and implementing core batteries for routine use in service settings and psychotherapy outcome research. Journal of Mental Health 1998; 7: 35–47
   Google Scholar
• Barkham M., Mellor-Clark J. Bridging evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence: Developing a rigorous and relevant knowledge for the psychological therapies. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 2003; 10: 319–327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow D. H., Hayes S. C., Nelson R. O. The scientist-practitioner. Pergamon, London 1984
   Google Scholar
• Bruce S., Paxton R. Ethical principles for evaluating mental health services: A Critical Examination. Journal of Mental Health 2002; 11: 267–279
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo J. T., Semin G. R., Berntson G. G. Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific Symbiosis. American Psychologist 2004; 59: 214–223
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Casarett D., Carlawish J., Sugarman J. Determining when quality improvement initiatives should be considered research. Journal of the American Medical Association 2000; 283: 2275–2280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane Centre. Study quality assessment. Cochrane Centre for Research and Dissemination, York 2001
   Google Scholar
• Cousins J. B., Leithwood K. A. Empirical research on evaluation utilisation. Review of Educational Research 1986; 56: 331–364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Research & development in the new NHS. Department of Health, London 1994
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. A first class service. Department of Health, London 1998
   Google Scholar
• Donabedian A. Quality of care: How can it be assessed?. Journal of the American Medical Association 1988; 260: 1743–1748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett S. B. Some values guiding community research and action. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1991; 24: 621–636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes S. C. Creating the empirical clinician. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 1996; 3: 179–181
   Google Scholar
• Komaki J. L. When performance improvement is the goal: A new set of criteria for criteria. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 1998; 31: 263–280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linehan M. M. Development, evaluation, and dissemination of effective psychosocial treatments: Levels of disorder, stages of care, and stages of treatment research. Drug abuse: Origins and interventions, M. D. Glantz, C. R. Harte. APA, Washington, DC 1999; 367–394
   Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCT's for complex interventions to improve health. Medical Research Council, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Milne D. L. Projects: A way of combining research and practice. Clinical Psychology Forum 1987; 9: 9–14
   Google Scholar
• Milne D. Social therapy: A guide to social support interventions for mental health practitioners. Wiley, Chichester 1999
   Google Scholar
• Milne D. L., Paxton R. A psychological re-analysis of the scientist practitioner model. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 1998; 5: 216–230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton R. Why are we here? Some quick & dirty reasons. Clinical Psychology Forum 1987; 9: 6–9
   Google Scholar
• Paxton R., Whitty P., Zaatar A., Fairburn A., Lothian J. Research, audit and quality improvement. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 2006; 19: 105–111
   Google Scholar
• Peckham M. Research & Development for the National Health Service. Lancet 1991; 338: 367–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi P. H., Lipsey M. W., Freeman H. E. Evaluation: A systematic approach. Sage, London 2004
   Google Scholar
• Russell I. T., Wilson B. J. Audit: the third clinical science?. Quality in Health Care 1992; 1: 51–55
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salkovskis P. M. Demonstrating specific effects in CBT. Research foundations for psychotherapy practice, M. Aveline, D. A. Shapiro. Wiley, New York 1995
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt T. A. Defining quality in evaluation. Evaluation and Programme Planning 1990; 13: 177–188
   Google Scholar
• Styles W. B. Quality control in qualitative research. Clinical Psychology Review 1993; 13: 593–618
   Google Scholar
• Watts F. N. Applicable psychological research in the NHS. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society 1984; 37: 41–42
   Google Scholar