What we talk about when we talk about recovery: a systematic review and best-fit framework synthesis of qualitative literature

References

• Andresen R, Caputi P, Oades LG. (2010). Do clinical outcome measures assess consumer-defined recovery? Psychiatry Res, 177, 309–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andresen R, Oades L, Caputi P. (2003). The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: Towards an empirically validated stage model. Aust NZ J Psychiatry, 37, 586–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony WA. (1993). Recovery from mental illness: The guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J, 16, 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Arboleda-Florez J, Stuart H. (2012). From sin to science: Fighting the stigmatization of mental illnesses. Can J Psychiatry, 57, 457–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenella J. (2015). Challenges for the recovery movement in the US: Will its light reach the darkest corners? Clin Psychol Forum, 268, 7–9
   Google Scholar
• Armour MP, Bradshaw W, Roseborough D. (2009). African Americans and recovery from severe mental illness. Social Work Mental Health, 7, 602–22
   Google Scholar
• Barker C, Pistrang N, Elliott R. (2002). Research methods in clinical psychology: An introduction for students and practitioners. Chichester: Wiley. Available from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/61215/ [last accessed 27 Jan 2015]
   Google Scholar
• Beresford P. (2015). From ‘recovery’ to reclaiming madness. Clin Psychol Forum, 268, 16–20
   Google Scholar
• Bird V, Leamy M, Tew J, et al. (2014). Fit for purpose? Validation of a conceptual framework for personal recovery with current mental health consumers. Aust NZ J Psychiatry, 48, 644–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije HR, van Wesel F, Alisic E. (2011). Making a difference: Towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis. J Eval Clin Prac, 17, 657–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney S, Stickley T. (2008). Recovery and mental health: A review of the British literature. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nurs, 15, 140–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg M, Davidson L. (2008). The nature of recovery as lived in everyday experience. J Mental Health, 17, 129–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradstreet S, McBrierty R. (2012). Recovery in Scotland: Beyond service development. Int Rev Psychiatry, 24, 64–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitat Res Psychol, 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Brijnath B. (2015). Applying the CHIME recovery framework in two culturally diverse Australian communities: Qualitative results. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 61, 660–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Psychological Society. (2012). e–Professionalism: Guidance on the use of social media by clinical psychologists. Leicester: British Psychological Society
   Google Scholar
• Browne G. (2006). Outcome measures: Do they fit with a recovery model? Australian & New Zealand. Int J Ment Health Nurs, 15, 153–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown W, Kandirikirira N. (2007). Recovering mental health in Scotland. Report on narrative investigation of mental health recovery. Glasgow: Scottish Recovery Network
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. (1994). Searching for meaning: A method of analysing interview transcripts with a personal computer. Nurse Educ Today, 14, 111–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, et al. (2003). Evaluating meta-ethnography: A synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med, 56, 671–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. (2011). A worked example of ‘best fit’ framework synthesis: A systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol, 11, 29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C, Booth A, Leaviss J, Rick J. (2013). Best fit’ framework synthesis: Refining the method. BMC Med Res Methodol, 13, 37–2288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for History and New Media. (2014). Zotero. Fairfax (VA): Center for History and New Media. Available from: https://www.zotero.org
   Google Scholar
• Chenail RJ. (2011). Learning to appraise the quality of qualitative research articles: A contextualized learning object for constructing knowledge. Qualitat Rep, 16, 236–48
   Google Scholar
• Connell J, O’Cathain A, Brazier J. (2014). Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions? Soc Sci Med, 120, 12–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. (2012). Beyond PICO: The SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitat Health Res, 22, 1435–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook JA, Copeland ME, Hamilton MM, et al. (2009). Initial outcomes of a mental illness self-management program based on wellness recovery action planning. Psychiatric Serv, 60, 246–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (2013). CASP qualitative research checklist. CASP. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/#!casp-tools-checklists/c18f8 [last accessed 21 Apr 2014]
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Borg M, Mann I, et al. (2005). Processes of recovery in serious mental illness: Findings from a multinational study. Psychiatric Rehabil Skills, 8, 177–201
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Roe D. (2007). Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. J Mental Health, 16, 459–70
   Google Scholar
• Davidson L, Strauss JS. (1992). Sense of self in recovery from severe mental illness. Br J Med Psychol, 65, 131–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DCP. (2014). Understanding psychosis and schizophrenia. Leicester: British Psychological Society Division of Clinical Psychology
   Google Scholar
• Deegan PE. (1988). Recovery: The lived experience of rehabilitation. Psychosoc Rehabil J, 11, 11–19
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M. (2011). Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studies. BMC Med, 9, 39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, 45–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, et al. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A Critical Perspective. Qualitat Res, 6, 27–44
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, Smith JA. (2004). The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Health Care, 13, 223–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Sutton A, Shaw R, et al. (2007). Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews: A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods. J Health Serv Res Policy, 12, 42–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dohrenwend BP. (2000). The role of adversity and stress in psychopathology: Some evidence and its implications for theory and research. J Health Soc Behav, 41, 1–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol, 38, 215–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksen KÅ, Arman M, Davidson L, et al. (2014). Challenges in relating to mental health professionals: Perspectives of persons with severe mental illness. Int J Mental Health Nurs, 23, 110–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estabrooks CA, Field PA, Morse JM. (1994). Aggregating qualitative findings: An approach to theory development. Qualitat Health Res, 4, 503–11
   Google Scholar
• Grayson L, Gomersall A. (2003). A difficult business: Finding the evidence for social science reviews. London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Queen Mary University of London
   Google Scholar
• Gumley A, Braehler C, Laithwaite H, et al. (2010). A compassion focused model of recovery after psychosis. Int J Cognitive Ther, 3, 186–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumley A, Schwannauer M. (2006). Staying well after psychosis: A cognitive interpersonal approach to recovery and relapse prevention. Vol. xvi. New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons Ltd
   Google Scholar
• Hagan T, Smail D. (1997). Power-mapping—I. Background and basic methodology. J Commun Appl Social Psychol, 7, 257–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden A. (2010). Mixed-methods systematic reviews: Integrating quantitative and qualitative findings. Focus: A Publication of the National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research (NCDDR) Technical Brief. Available from: http://ktdrr.org/ktlibrary/articles_pubs/ncddrwork/focus/focus25/Focus25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harper D, Speed E. (2012). Uncovering recovery: The resistible rise of recovery and resilience. Stud Social Justice, 6, 9–26
   Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Levin ME, Plumb-Vilardaga J, et al. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: Examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav Ther, 44, 180–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen LW, Wadkins TA. (2007). Mental health success stories: Finding paths to recovery. Issues Mental Health Nurs, 28, 325–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson B, Montgomery P. (1999). Chronic mentally ill individuals reentering the community after hospitalization. Phase II: The urban experience. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nurs, 6, 445–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leamy M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, et al. (2011). Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Br J Psychiatry, 199, 445–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358, 483–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin I, Mezzina R, Borg M, et al. (2005). The person’s role in recovery. Psychiatric Rehabil Skills, 8, 223–42
   Google Scholar
• Maslow AH. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev, 50, 370–96
   Google Scholar
• McKirdy J. (2015). Patient and public involvement in research. DCP-S Rev, 11, 15–17
   Google Scholar
• Mezey GC, Kavuma M, Turton P, et al. (2010). Perceptions, experiences and meanings of recovery in forensic psychiatric patients. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol, 21, 683–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midlands Psychology Groups. (2012). Draft manifesto for a social materialist psychology of distress. J Critic Psychol Counsel Psychother, 12, 93–107
   Google Scholar
• Monger B, Hardie SM, Ion R, et al. (2013). The Individual recovery outcomes counter: Preliminary validation of a personal recovery measure. The Psychiatrist, 37, 221–7
   Google Scholar
• Ochocka J, Nelson G, Janzen R. (2005). Moving forward: Negotiating self and external circumstances in recovery. Psychosocial Rehabil J, 28, 315–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onken SJ, Craig CM, Ridgway P, et al. (2007). An analysis of the definitions and elements of recovery: A review of the literature. Psychiatr Rehabil J, 31, 9–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papaioannou D, Sutton A, Carroll C, et al. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: Consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Inform Libraries J, 27, 114–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesola F, Williams J, Bird V, et al. (2015). Development and evaluation of an Individualized Outcome Measure (IOM) for randomized controlled trials in mental health. Int J Methods Psychiatric Res, 24, 257–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piat M, Sabetti J, Couture A, et al. (2009). What does recovery mean for me? Perspectives of Canadian mental health consumers. Psychosocial Rehabil J, 32, 199–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim D. (2008). ‘Recovery’ and current mental health policy. Chronic Illness, 4, 295–304
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pitt L, Kilbride M, Nothard S, et al. (2007). Researching recovery from psychosis: A user-led project. Psychiatric Bull Psychiatrist, 31, 55–60
   Google Scholar
• Poortman C, Schildkamp K. (2012). Alternative quality standards in qualitative research? Quality Quantity, 46, 1727–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychologists Against Austerity. (2015). The psychological impact of austerity: A briefing paper. Available from https://psychagainstausterity.wordpress.com/psychological-impact-of-austerity-briefing-paper/
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. (2014). NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 10
   Google Scholar
• Rethink. (2005). A report on the work of the recovery learning sites and other recovery-orientated activities and its incorporation into The Rethink Plan 2004-08. Birmingham: Rethink
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes P, De Jager A. (2013). Narrative studies of recovery: A critical resource for clinicians. Clin Psychol, 18, 99–107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe D, Rudnick A, Gill KJ. (2007). The Concept of being in recovery. Psychiatric Rehabil J, 30, 171–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts G, Boardman J. (2013). Understanding ‘recovery’. Adv Psychiatric Treat, 19, 400–9
   Google Scholar
• Rose D. (2014). The mainstreaming of recovery. J Ment Health, 23, 217–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks V, Williams J, Leamy M, et al. (2013). Measures of personal recovery: A systematic review. Psychiatr Serv, 64, 974–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein SM, Bellack AS. (2008). A scientific agenda for the concept of recovery as it applies to schizophrenia. Clin Psychol Rev, 28, 1108–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Bird V, Le Boutillier C, et al. (2011). REFOCUS trial: Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Bird V, Clarke E, et al. (2015). Supporting recovery in patients with psychosis through care by community-based adult mental health teams (REFOCUS): A multisite, cluster, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry, 2, 503–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Leamy M, Bacon F, et al. (2012a). International differences in understanding recovery: Systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatric Sci, 21, 353–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade M, Williams J, Bird V, et al. (2012b). Recovery grows up. J Ment Health, 21, 99–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Merry J, Freeman R, Sturdy S. (2011). Implementing recovery: An analysis of the key technologies in Scotland. Int J Mental Health Syst, 5, 11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MK. (2000). Recovery from a severe psychiatric disability: Findings of a qualitative study. Psychiatric Rehabil J, 24, 149–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth G, Harries P, Dorer G. (2011). Exploring mental health service users’ experiences of social inclusion in their community occupations. Br J Occup Ther, 74, 323–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaniol L, Wewiorski NJ, Gagne C, Anthony WA. (2002). The process of recovery from schizophrenia. Int Rev Psychiatry, 14, 327–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemler SE. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Prac Assess Res Eval, 9, 66–78
   Google Scholar
• Stickley T, Wright N. (2011). The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part One: A review of the peer-reviewed literature using a systematic approach. J Psychiatric Mental Health Nurs, 18, 247–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne S, Jensen L, Kearney MH, et al. (2004). Qualitative metasynthesis: Reflections on methodological orientation and ideological agenda. Qualitat Health Res, 14, 1342–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill H, Clare L, May R. (2004). Escape, enlightenment and endurance: Narrative of recovery from psychosis. Anthropol Med, 11, 181–99
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tooth B, Kalyanasundaram V, Glover H, Momenzadah S. (2003). Factors consumers identify as important to recovery from schizophrenia. Aust Psychiatry, 11, S70–7
   Google Scholar
• Topor A, Borg M, Di Girolamo S, Davidson L. (2011). Not just an individual journey: Social aspects of recovery. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 57, 90–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turton P, Demetriou A, Boland W, MH, et al. (2011). One size fits all: or horses for courses? Recovery-based care in specialist mental health services. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 46, 127–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veseth M, Binder P, Borg M, Davidson L. (2012). Toward caring for oneself in a life of intense ups and downs: A reflexive-collaborative exploration of recovery in bipolar disorder. Qualitat Health Res, 22, 119–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh D, Downe S. (2006). Appraising the quality of qualitative research. Midwifery, 22, 108–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner R. (2010). Does the scientific evidence support the recovery model? The Psychiatrist, 34, 3–5
   Google Scholar
• Williams J, Leamy M, Bird V, et al. (2015). Development and evaluation of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery. Social Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol, 50, 777–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley L. (2000). Dilemmas in qualitative health research. Psychol Health, 15, 215–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SL, Ensing DS. (1999). Exploring recovery from the perspective of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatr Rehabil J, 22, 219–31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar