The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: an evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling

References

• Asparouhov T, Muthen B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing structural equation models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 136162
   Google Scholar
• Chen FF. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equation Modeling, 9, 233–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruin GP, Du Plessis GA. (2015). Bifactor analysis of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC-SF). Psychol Rep, 116, 438–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychol Bull, 95, 542–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Tay L. (2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. Int J Psychol, 50, 135–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disabato DJ, Goodman FR, Kashdan TB, et al. (2016). Different types of wellbeing? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychol Assess, 28, 471–82. doi:10.1037/pas0000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods, 4, 272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hides L, Quinn C, Stoyanov S, et al. (2016). Is the mental wellbeing of young Australians best represented by a single, multidimensional or bifactor model? Psychiatry Res, 241, 1–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling: A Multidiscip J, 6, 1–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M. (2016). A new look at the factor structure of the MHC-SF in Iran and the United States using exploratory structural equation modeling. J Clin Psychol, 72, 701–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M. (in press). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. J Happiness Stud
   Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Lamers SMA. (2016). Reinvestigation of the factor structure of the MHC-SF in the Netherlands: Contributions of exploratory structural equation modeling. Pers Individ Dif, 97, 8–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Jose P, Kielpikowski M. (in press). The value of exploratory structural equation modeling in identifying factor overlap in the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF): A study with a New Zealand sample. J Happiness Stud
   Google Scholar
• Joshanloo M, Wissing MP, Khumalo IP, Lamers S. (2013). Measurement invariance of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) across three cultural groups. Pers Individ Dif, 55, 755–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanović V. (2015). Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Pers Individ Dif, 75, 154–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaś D, Cieciuch J, Keyes CL. (2014). The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Pers Individ Dif, 69, 104–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashdan TB, Biswas-Diener R, King LA. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. J Positive Psychol, 3, 219–33
   Google Scholar
• Keyes CLM. (1998). Social well-being. Soc Psychol Quarterly, 61, 121–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes CLM. (2006). The subjective well-being of America's youth: Toward a comprehensive assessment. Adolesc Fam Health, 4, 3–11
   Google Scholar
• Keyes CL, Annas J. (2009). Feeling good and functioning well: Distinctive concepts in ancient philosophy and contemporary science. J Positive Psychol, 4, 197–201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes CL, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, et al. (2008). Evaluation of the Mental Health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother, 15, 181–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline RB. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed). New York: Guilford Press
   Google Scholar
• Lamers S, Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer ET, et al. (2011). Evaluating the psychometric properties of the Mental Health Continuum‐Short Form (MHC‐SF). J Clin Psychol, 67, 99–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Muthén B, et al. (2010). A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychol Assess, 22, 471–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Morin AJS, Parker PD, Kaur G. (2014). Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Ann Rev Clin Psychol, 10, 85–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, et al. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Struct Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 439–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Arens AK, Marsh HW. (2016). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Struct Equation Modeling, 23, 116–39. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2014.961800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin AJS, Marsh HW, Nagengast B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In: Hancock GR, Mueller RO, eds. Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 395–436
   Google Scholar
• Petrillo G, Capone V, Caso D, Keyes CL. (2014). The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) as a measure of well-being in the Italian context. Soc Indicators Res, 121, 291–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise SP. (2012). Invited paper: The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behav Res, 47, 667–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez A, Reise SP, Haviland MG. (2016). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. J Person Assess, 98, 223–37. doi: 10.1080/00223891.(2015).1089249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosellini AJ, Brown TA. (2011). The NEO Five-Factor Inventory: Latent structure and relationships with dimensions of anxiety and depressive disorders in a large clinical sample. Assessment, 18, 27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryff CD. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychother Psychosom, 83, 10–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh K, Bassi M, Junnarkar M, Negri L. (2015). Mental health and psychosocial functioning in adolescence: An investigation among Indian students from Delhi. J Adolesc, 39, 59–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
   Google Scholar
• Weston R, Gore PA. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. Couns Psychol, 34, 719–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar