A qualitative exploration of patient and family views and experiences of treatment decision-making in bipolar II disorder

References

• Adams J, Drake R, Wolford G. (2007). Shared decision-making preferences of people with severe mental illness. Psych Serv, 58, 1219–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and stastical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association
   Google Scholar
• Badger F, Nolan P. (2007). Attributing recovery from depression. Perceptions of people cared for in primary care. J Clin Nurs, 16, 25–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr PJ, Forcino RC, Mishra M, et al. (2016). Competing priorities in treatment decision-making: a US national survey of individuals with depression and clinicians who treat depression. BMJ Open, 6, e009585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MS, Crits-Christoph P, Ball WA, et al. (1991). Independent assessment of manic and depressive symptoms by self-rating: Scale characteristics and implications for the study of mania. Arch Gen Psychiatr, 48, 807–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer MS, Vojta C, Kinosian B, et al. (2000). The Internal State Scale: replication of its discriminating abilities in a multisite, public sector sample. Bipolar Disord, 2, 340–6. doi:10.1034/j.1399-5618.2000.020409.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beitinger R, Kissling W, Hamann J. (2014). Trends and perspectives of shared decision-making in schizophrenia and related disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 27, 222–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berk M, Berk L, Castle D. (2004). A collaborative approach to the treatment alliance in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord, 6, 504–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual Res, 8, 137–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual ResPsychol, 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In: H. Cooper, ed. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 57–71
   Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. (1997). Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med, 44, 681–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. (1999). Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med, 49, 651–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications
   Google Scholar
• De las Cuevas C, Penate W, de Rivera L. (2014). To what extent is treatment adherence of psychiatric patients influenced by their participation in shared decision making? Patient Prefer Adher, 8, 1547–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De las Cuevas C, Peñate W, de Rivera L. (2014). Psychiatric patients’ preferences and experiences in clinical decision-making: Examining concordance and correlates of patients’ preferences. Patient Educ Couns, 96, 222–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degner LF, Kristjanson LJ, Bowman D, et al. (1997). Information needs and decisional preferences in women with breast cancer. JAMA, 277, 1485–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan E, Best C, Hagen S. (2010). Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 20, CD007297. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med, 27, 1361–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein RM, Street RL. (2011). Shared mind: Communication, decision making, and autonomy in serious illness. Ann Fam Med, 9, 454–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher A, Manicavasagar V, Kiln F, Juraskova I. (2016). Communication and decision-making in mental health: A systematic review focusing on bipolar disorder. Patient Educ Couns, 99, 1106–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann J, Heres S. (2014). Adapting Shared Decision Making for Individuals With Severe Mental Illness. Paper presented at the Open Forum
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen M, O’Connor A. (1999). Population needs assessment: A workbook for assessing patients’ and practitioners’ decision making needs. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
   Google Scholar
• Janz NK, Wren PA, Copeland LA, et al. (2004). Patient-physician concordance: preferences, perceptions, and factors influencing the breast cancer surgical decision. J Clin Oncol, 22, 3091–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd LL, Akiskal HS, Schettler PJ, et al. (2005). Psychosocial disability in the course of bipolar I and II disorders: a prospective, comparative, longitudinal study. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 62, 1322–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan BM, Dimidjian S, Rizvi SL. (2010). Treatment preference, engagement, and clinical improvement in pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy for depression. Behav Res Ther, 48, 799–804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, et al. (2016). Family involvement in cancer treatment decision-making: A qualitative study of patient, family, and clinician attitudes and experiences. Patient Educ Couns, 99, 1146–1155
   Google Scholar
• Laidsaar-Powell R, Butow P, Bu S, et al. (2013). Physician–patient–companion communication and decision-making: a systematic review of triadic medical consultations. Patient Educ Counsel, 91, 3–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebherz S, Tlach L, Härter M, Dirmaier J. (2015). Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders–results of an online survey. Patient Prefer Adher, 9, 627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Crump RT. (2013). Decision support for patients values clarification and preference elicitation. Med Care Res Rev, 70, 50S–79S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maassen EF, Schrevel SJ, Dedding CW, et al. (2016). Comparing patients’ perspectives of “good care” in Dutch outpatient psychiatric services with academic perspectives of patient-centred care. J Ment Health. doi:10.3109/09638237.2016.1167848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhi G, Adams D, Lampe L, et al. (2009). Clinical practice recommendations for bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiat Scand, 119, 27–46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer DZ, Avery LM. (2009). Excel as a qualitative data analysis tool. Field Methods, 21, 91–112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton AC, Mullan BA. (2014). Communication of a mental health diagnosis: a systematic synthesis and narrative review. J Ment Health, 23, 261–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan MT, Hughes M, Narendra DP, et al. (2005). When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage, 30, 342–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SG, Derman M, Dixon LB, et al. (2014). Factors associated with shared decision - Making preferences among veterans with serious mental illness. Psych Serv, 65, 1409–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Fletcher K. (2014). Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage. J Affect Disord, 152, 57–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Fletcher K, Barrett M, et al. (2008). Screening for bipolar disorder: the utility and comparative properties of the MSS and MDQ measures. J Affect Disord, 109, 83–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Graham R, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, et al. (2012). Further examination of the utility and comparative properties of the MSQ and MDQ bipolar screening measures. J Affect Disord, 138, 104–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Graham R, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, et al. (2013). Differentiation of bipolar I and II disorders by examining for differences in severity of manic/hypomanic symptoms and the presence or absence of psychosis during that phase. J Affect Disord, 150, 941–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker G, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Tully L. (2006). Distinguishing bipolar and unipolar disorders: an isomer model. J Affect Disord, 96, 67–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel SR, Bakken S, Ruland C. (2008). Recent advances in shared decision making for mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry, 21, 606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J, Nicholls CM, Ormston R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage
   Google Scholar
• Sansoni J, Grootemaat P, Duncan C, et al. (2014). A Systematic Literature Review on Question Prompt Lists in Health Care (Final Report). doi:http://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Question-Prompt-List-Literature-Review.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seale C, Chaplin R, Lelliott P, Quirk A. (2006). Sharing decisions in consultations involving anti-psychotic medication: a qualitative study of psychiatrists’ experiences. Soc Sci Med, 62, 2861–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MB, Hetrick SE, Jorm AF. (2011). Experiences of treatment decision making for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study in primary care and specialist mental health settings. BMC Psychiatry, 11, 194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon D, Loh A, Wills CE, Härter M. (2007). Depressed patients’ perceptions of depression treatment decision‐making. Health Expect, 10, 62–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobh R, Perry C. (2006). Research design and data analysis in realism research. Eur J Mark, 40, 1194–209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. (2014). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 28, CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
   Google Scholar
• Yatham LN, Kennedy SH, Parikh SV, et al. (2013). Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) and International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) collaborative update of CANMAT guidelines for the management of patients with bipolar disorder: update 2013. Bipolar Disord, 15, 1–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar