Improving recruitment to healthcare research studies: clinician judgements explored for opting mental health service users out of the time to change viewpoint survey

References

• Adams C. (2013). Many more reasons behind difficulties in recruiting patients to randomized controlled trials in psychiatry. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 22, 321–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Borschmann R, Patterson S, Poovendran D, et al. (2014). Influences on recruitment to randomised controlled trials in mental health settings in England: A national cross-sectional survey of researchers working for the Mental Health Research Network. BMC Med Res Methodol, 14, 23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark M, Chilvers C. (2005). Mental health research system in England: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. Psychiatr Bull, 29, 441–5
   Google Scholar
• Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, et al. (2011). Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature, 475, 27–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corker E, Hamilton S, Henderson C, et al. (2013). Experiences of discrimination among people using mental health services in England 2008–2011. Br J Psychiatry, 202, s58–63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2006). Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. London: HMSO
   Google Scholar
• Ennis L, Wykes T. (2013). Impact of patient involvement in mental health research: Longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry, 203, 381–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher B, Gheorghe A, Moore D, et al. (2012). Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: A systematic review. BMJ Open, 2, e000496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Medical Council. (2013). Good Practice in research to consent in research. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/Good_practice_in_research_and_consent_to_research.pdf_58834843.pdf [last accessed 4 Nov 2017: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/)
   Google Scholar
• Gould S, Bowker C, Roberts A. (2004). Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. BMJ, 328, 140–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton S, Pinfold V, Rose D, et al. (2011). The effect of disclosure of mental illness by interviewers on reports of discrimination experienced by service users: A randomized study. Int Rev Psychiatry, 23, 47–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson C, Corker E, Lewis-Holmes E, et al. (2012). England’s time to change antistigma campaign: One-year outcomes of service user-rated experiences of discrimination. Psychiatric Serv, 63, 451–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson C, Thornicroft G. (2009). Stigma and discrimination in mental illness: Time to change. Lancet, 373, 1928–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard L, de Salis I, Tomlin Z, et al. (2009). Why is recruitment to trials difficult? An investigation into recruitment difficulties in an RCT of supported employment in patients with severe mental illness. Contemp Clin Trials, 30, 40–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes-Morley A, Young B, Waheed W, et al. (2015). Factors affecting recruitment into depression trials: Systematic review, meta-synthesis and conceptual framework. J Affect Disord, 172, 274–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeson VC, Tyrer P. (2013). The advance of research governance in psychiatry: One step forward, two steps back. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 22, 313–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mairs H, Lovell K, Keeley P. (2012). Clinician views of referring people with negative symptoms to outcome research: A questionnaire survey. Int J Ment Health Nurs, 21, 138–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason VL, Shaw A, Wiles NJ, et al. (2007). GPs’ experiences of primary care mental health research: A qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment. Fam Pract, 24, 518–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Richards MA, Newton JN, et al. (2013). UK health performance: Findings of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 381, 997–1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS England. (2016). Five year forward view for mental health for the NHS in England. A report from the independent mental health taskforce for NHS England. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Mental-Health-Taskforce-FYFV-final.pdf [last accessed 12 Aug 2016]
   Google Scholar
• Papoulias C, Robotham D, Drake G, et al. (2014). Staff and service users’ views on a ‘Consent for Contact’ research register within psychosis services: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson S, Kramo K, Soteriou T, Crawford MJ. (2010). The great divide: A qualitative investigation of factors influencing researcher access to potential randomised controlled trial participants in mental health settings. J Ment Health, 19, 532–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts LW, Warner TD, Hammond KG, Hoop JG. (2006). Views of people with schizophrenia regarding aspects of research: Study size and funding sources. Schizophr Bull, 32, 107–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robotham d, Wykes T, Rose D, et al. (2016). Service user and career priories in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health. J Ment Health, 25, 185–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D, Fleischman P, Wykes T. (2008). What are mental health service users’ priorities for research in the UK? J Ment Health, 17, 520–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornicroft G, Brohan E, Rose D, et al. (2009). Global pattern of experienced and anticipated discrimination against people with schizophrenia: A cross-sectional survey. Lancet, 373, 408–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treweek S, Lockhart P, Pitkethly M, et al. (2013). Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 3, e002360. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulivi G, Reilly J, Atkinson JM. (2009). Protection or empowerment: Mental health service users’ views on access and consent for non-therapeutic research. J Ment Health, 18, 161–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia J, Adams C, Bhagat N, et al. (2009). Losing participants before the trial ends erodes credibility of findings. Psychiatr Bull, 33, 254–7
   Google Scholar