Peer-supported Open Dialogue: a thematic analysis of trainee perspectives on the approach and training

References

• Andersen T. (1995). Reflecting processes. Acts of informing and forming. In: Friedman S, ed. The reflective team in action. New York: Guilford
   Google Scholar
• Anderson H. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities. New York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Ardito R, Rabellino D. (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychol, 2, 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracken P, Thomas P, Yeomans D, et al. (2012). Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm. Br J Psychiatry, 201, 430–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Eliacin J, Salyers M, Kukla M, Matthias M. (2015). Factors influencing patients’ preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care. J Ment Health, 24, 24–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopfenbeck M. (2015). Peer-supported open dialogue. Context, 138, 29–31
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Minnesota: University of Minnesota
   Google Scholar
• Ljungberg A, Denhov A, Topor A. (2016). Non-helpful relationships with professionals – A literature review of the perspective of persons with severe mental illness. J Ment Health, 25, 267–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markova I, Linell P, Grossen M, Orvig AS. (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox
   Google Scholar
• Nel PW. (2006). Trainee perspectives on their family therapy training. J Fam Ther, 28, 307–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NHS Staff Survey Results. (2015). Available from: http://www.nhsstaffsurveys.com/Page/1006/Latest-Results/2015-Results/
   Google Scholar
• Olson M, Seikkula J, Ziedonis D. (2014). The key elements of dialogic practice in Open Dialogue. Worcester, MA: The University of Massachusetts Medical School. 2 September 2014, Version 1.1. Available from: http://umassmed.edu/psychiatry/globalinitiatives/opendialogue/
   Google Scholar
• Paris E, Linville D, Rosen K. (2006). Marriage and family therapist interns' experiences of growth. J Marit Fam Ther, 32, 45–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaque R, Stockmann T. (2016). An introduction to peer-supported open dialogue. BJPsych Adv, 22, 348–56
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes P, Nge C, Wallis A, et al. (2011). Learning and living systemic: Exploring the personal effects of family therapy training. Contemp Fam Ther, 33, 335
   Google Scholar
• Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse R. (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ, 13, 42–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula J, Aaltonen J, Alakare B, et al. (2006). Five-year experience of first-episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: Treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychother Res, 16, 214–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula J, Aaltonen J, Rasinkangas A, et al. (2003). Open dialogue approach: Treatment principles and preliminary results of a two-year follow-up on first episode schizophrenia. Ethic Hum Sci Serv, 5, 163–82
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula J, Alakare B, Aaltonen J. (2011a). The comprehensive open-dialogue approach in Western Lapland: II. Long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis: Psychol Soc Integ Approach, 3, 192–204
   Google Scholar
• Seikkula J, Olson ME. (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Fam Process, 42, 403–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula J, Trimble D. (2005). Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Fam Process, 44, 461–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seikkula J. (2011b). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? The Australian & New Zealand. J Fam Ther, 32, 179–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar