Questioning diagnoses in clinical practice: a thematic analysis of clinical psychologists’ accounts of working beyond diagnosis in the United Kingdom

References

• Boyle M. (2011). Making the world go away, and how psychology and psychiatry benefit. In: Rapley M, Moncrieff J, Dillon J, eds. De-medicalizing misery: Psychiatry, psychology and the human condition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 27–43
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3, 77–101
   Google Scholar
• Callard F. (2014). Psychiatric diagnosis: The indispensability of ambivalence. J Med Ethics, 40, 526–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles S. (2016). Psychiatric diagnosis. Problems and persistence. Context, 147, 24–7
   Google Scholar
• Court AJ, Cooke A, Scrivener A. (2016). They're NICE and neat, but are they useful? A grounded theory of clinical psychologists' beliefs about and use of NICE guidelines. Clin Psychol Psychother, 24, 899–910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology (DCP). (2011). Good practice guidelines on the use of psychological formulation. Leicester: The British Psychological Society
   Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology (DCP). (2013). Classification of behaviour and experience in relation to functional psychiatric diagnoses: Time for a paradigm shift. A position statement. Leicester: The British Psychological Society
   Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology (DCP). (2015). Guidelines on language in relation to functional psychiatric diagnosis. Leicester: The British Psychological Society
   Google Scholar
• Division of Clinical Psychology (DCP). (2016). Understanding psychiatric diagnosis in adult mental health. Leicester: The British Psychological Society
   Google Scholar
• Elliott R, Fischer CT, Rennie DL. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. Br J Clin Psychol, 38, 215–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans SC, Reed GM, Roberts MC, et al. (2013). Psychologists’ perspectives on the diagnostic classification of mental disorders: Results from the WHO-IUPsyS Global Survey. Int J Psychol, 48, 177–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. (1982). The subject and power. Crit Inq, 8, 777–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golafshani N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Rep, 8, 597–606
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone L, Boyle M, Cromby J. (2017). The power/threat/meaning: Framework: Beyond diagnosis to meaning-based patterns in emotional distress. Division of Clinical Psychology Annual Conference 2017; Liverpool
   Google Scholar
• Kinderman P, Read J, Moncrieff J, Bentall RP. (2013). Drop the language of disorder. Evid Based Ment Health, 16, 2–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maercker A, Reed GM, Watts A, et al. (2014). What do psychologists think about classificatory diagnostics: The WHO-IUPsyS-survey in Germany and Switzerland in preparation for the ICD-11. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol, 64, 315–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason B. (1993). Towards positions of safe uncertainty. Human Systems: J Syst Consult Manage, 4, 189–200
   Google Scholar
• Pemberton R, Wainwright T. (2014). The end of mental illness thinking? Int J Clin Health Psychol, 14, 216–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilgrim D, Coles S. (2011). The profession’s ethical obligation to challenge psychiatric diagnosis. Clin Psychol Forum, 224, 53–5
   Google Scholar
• Simblett G. (2013). Dancing with the DSM: The reflexive positioning of narrative informed psychiatric practice. Aust N Z J Fam Ther, 34, 114–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smail DJ. (2001). The nature of unhappiness. London: Robinson
   Google Scholar
• Timimi S. (2014). No more psychiatric labels: Why formal psychiatric diagnostic systems should be abolished. Int J Clin Health Psychol, 14, 208–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “Big-Tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq, 16, 837–51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar