Social media, cyber-aggression and student mental health on a university campus

References

• Ang RP, Goh DH. (2010). Cyberbullying among adolescents: The role of affective and cognitive empathy, and gender. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev, 41, 387–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aricak MT. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. EJER, 34, 167–84.
   Google Scholar
• Barak A. (2005). Sexual harassment on the internet. Soc Sci Comput Rev, 23, 77–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartow A. (2009). Internet defamation as profit center: The monetization of online harassment. J Law Biosci, 32, 383–429.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett D, Guran EL, Ramos MC, Margolin G. (2011). College students electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and associations with risky behaviors. Violence Vict, 26, 410–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrajo E, Gamez-Guadix M, Calvete E. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence, context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychol Rep, 116, 565–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In: Buckingham D, ed. MacArthur foundation series on digital learning: Youth, identity, and digital media volume. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 119–42.
   Google Scholar
• Burkett M. (2015). Sex(t) talk: A qualitative analysis of young adults’ negotiations of the pleasures and perils of sexting. Sex Cult, 19, 835–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell M. (2005). The impact of the mobile phone on young people’s social life. Presented at the Social Change in the 21st Century Conference, Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Citron DK. (2009). Law’s expressive value in combating cyber gender harassment. Mich Law Rev, 108, 373–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citron DK, Franks MA. (2014). Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake For Law Rev, 49, 345–91.
   Google Scholar
• Colao JJ. (2014). The inside story of Snapchat: The inside story of Snapchat: The world's hottest app or a $3 billion disappearing act? Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/jjcolao/2014/01/06/the-inside-story-of-snapchat-the-worlds-hottest-app-or-a-3-billion-disappearing-act/.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin J, Strauss A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol, 13, 3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig SL, McInroy LB, McCready LT, et al. (2015). Connecting without fear: Clinical implications of the consumption of information and communication technologies by sexual minority youth and young adults. Clin Soc Work J, 43, 159–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham CE, Chen Y, Villancourt T, et al. (2015). Modeling the anti-cyberbullying preferences of university students: Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Aggress Behav, 41, 369–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeseredy W, Kelly K. (1993). The incidence and prevalence of woman abuse in Canadian university and college dating relationships. Can J Sociol, 18, 137–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucher C, Jackson M, Cassidy W. (2014). Cyberbullying among university students: Gendered experiences, impacts, and perspectives. Educ Res Int, 2014, 698545.
   Google Scholar
• Faucher C, Jackson M, Cassidy W. (2015). When online exchanges byte: An examination of the policy environment governing cyberbullying at the university level. CJHE, 45, 102–21.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelhor D, Mitchell K, Wolak J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation’s Youth. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children. Available from: http://www.unh.edu/ccrc/YouthInternetinfopage.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grigg DW. (2010). Cyber-aggression: Definition and concept of cyberbullying. Aust J Guid Couns, 20, 143–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton S, Lewis-Holmes E, Pinfold V, et al. (2014). Discrimination against people with a mental health diagnosis: Qualitative analysis of reported experiences. JMH, 23, 88–93.
   Google Scholar
• Henry N, Powell A. (2015). Beyond the ‘sext’: Technology-facilitated sexual violence and harassment against adult women. Aust N Z J Criminol, 48, 104–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinduja S, Patchin JW. (2009). Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell JA, Brown CS. (2013). Sexting, catcalls, and butt slaps: How gender stereotypes and perceived group norms predict sexualized behaviour. Sex Roles, 69, 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educ Res, 33, 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinos CM, Antoniadou N, Markos A. (2014). Cyber-bullying: An investigation of the psychological profile of university student participants. J Appl Dev Psychol, 35, 204–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciw J, Greytak E, Diaz E, Bartkiewicz M. (2010). The 2009 National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth in our nation's schools. Available from: https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwil0b7Cxb_SAhUp1oMKHX4DAS0QFggaMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.glsen.org%2Fdownload%2Ffile%2FNDIyMw%3D%3D&usg=AFQjCNFGLRIOS9wgsqJq5FWDLc4t268Q&sig2=bDydJHkw1CgZk3JF85g6Og&bvm=bv.148747831,d.amc.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft EM, Wang J. (2010). An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. IJT, 1, 74–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. (2003). The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a two-item depression screener. Med Care, 41, 1284–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lembrechts L. (2012). Digital image bullying among school students in Belgium: An exploration of the characteristics of bullies and their victims. IJCC, 6, 968.
   Google Scholar
• Marganski A, Melander L. (2015). Intimate partner violence victimization in the cyber and real world: Examining the extent of cyber aggression experiences and its association with in-person dating violence. J Interpers Violence, Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna F, Cook C, Gadalla T, et al. (2010). Cyber bullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Am J Orthopsychiatry, 80, 362–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna F, Schwan K, Lefebrvre R, et al. (2014). Students in distress: Unanticipated findings in a cyber bullying study. Child Youth Serv Rev, 44, 341–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishna F, Van Wert M. (2015). Bullying in Canada. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell KJ, Finkelhor D, Jones LM, Wolak J. (2012). Prevalence and characteristics of youth sexting: A national study. Pediatrics, 129, 13–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molluzzo JC, Lawler J. (2012). A study of the perceptions of college students on cyberbullying. ISEDJ, 10, 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett D. (2008). Qualitative methods in social work research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Incorporation.
   Google Scholar
• Pepler D. (2006). Bullying interventions: A binocular Perspective. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 15, 16–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polanin JR, Espelage DL, Pigott TD. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-abused bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psych Rev, 41, 47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice ES, Haynes E, Royce P, Thompson SC. (2016). Social media and digital technology use among indigenous young people in Australia: A literature review. Int J Equity Health, 15, 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenk AM, Fremouw WJ. (2012). Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. J Sch Violence, 11, 21–37.
   Google Scholar
• Singh AA. (2013). Transgender youth of color and resilience: Negotiating oppression and finding support. Sex Roles, 68, 690–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slonje R, Smith PK. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scand J Psychol, 49, 147–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang OT, Oliffe JL, Galdas PM, et al. (2014). College men's depression-related help-seeking: A gender analysis. J Ment Health, 23, 219–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokunaga RS. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Human Behav, 26, 277–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Toronto, Office of the Assistant Vice-President, Government, Institutional and Community Relations (2015). Facts and Figures 2015 Report, University of Toronto. Available from: https://www.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/Facts_Figures_2015_online_entire_book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walker CM, Sockman BR, Koehn S. (2011). An exploratory study of cyberbullying with undergraduate university students. TechTrends, 55, 31–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wenker K, Gorchynski J. (2004). Intimate partner violence among women presenting to a university emergency department. Cal J Emerg Med, 5, 34–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wensley K, Campbell M. (2012). Heterosexual and nonheterosexual young university students' involvement in traditional and cyber forms of bullying. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw, 15, 649–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker E, Kowalski RM. (2015). Cyberbullying via social media. J Sch Violence, 14, 11–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright MF, Li Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber-aggression among young adults: A longitudinal investigation. Aggress Behav, 39, 161–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalaquett CP, Chatters SJ. (2014). Cyberbullying in college: Frequency, characteristics, and practical implications. SAGE Open, 4, doi: 10.1177/2158244014526721.
   Google Scholar